Government: ‘Forced Academies’ cannot also be ‘forced "faith" schools’

Failing schools compelled by the government to convert to being sponsored Academies cannot also be forced to adopt the religious character of their sponsor body. The news comes in correspondence between the Department for Education (DfE) and British Humanist Association (BHA). The BHA has welcomed the reassurance, but urged parents and teachers to be diligent to ensure that no pressure is placed on a ‘forced Academy’, as such schools have been dubbed, to also become a ‘forced “faith” school’.

In Essex, Briscoe Primary and Nursery School, a failing community school without a religious character, is being compelled to convert to be an Academy sponsored by Wickford C of E Voluntary Controlled Infants School, a former Voluntary Controlled school that separately chose to convert to being an Academy last year. This means that Wickford will have control over the governance of Briscoe, despite Wickford latter being a ‘faith’ school but Briscoe not. The BHA asked the DfE if Wickford could force Briscoe to legally adopt its religious designation, or otherwise adopt its ‘faith ethos’.

In its reply, the DfE confirmed this would not be possible:

‘We agree that it would not be right for the process of becoming an Academy to be a means by which parents and the local community are denied the opportunity to express their views about changes in the character of their local schools. As Wickford CofE School is a Church school and is sponsoring a community school we have been clear with both schools that the community school cannot change its characteristics, adopt its ethos or seek a designation simply because its proposed sponsor is a Church school. If such a change was proposed we would expect there to be a thorough consultation, the responses to which showed strong local support.’

The DfE also explained that the funding agreement of the Academy would give the Secretary of State the right to veto any proposals for ‘forced Academies’ without a religious character to gain one – something that has not previously been the case. This rule was recently introduced for Free Schools, and it is welcome to hear it will also be introduced for Academies, and the veto would be exercised in cases such as this one.

Commenting on the changes, BHA Faith Schools Campaigner Richy Thompson said, ‘This reassurance from the DfE is welcome, although we still have concerns that pressure will be brought to bear on these schools to become ‘faith’ schools. And it would be preferable if such rules were in law, not just in a funding agreement and subject to the whim of the government of the day. We will join parents, teachers and other local campaigners in ensuring that no “forced Academy” also becomes a “forced ‘faith’ school”.’

Good news from the Susan G. Komen Foundation!

Karen Handel, the conservative anti-choice executive who led the foundation into an embarrassing public relations debacle, has announced that she is resigning her position. This exit is most excellent news on a couple of levels. It means one bad apple has been shooed out of an influential position. It means that the Susan G. Komen Foundation recognizes the importance of the whole of women’s health issues (we hope!), and could signify a smarter, better direction for the organization and make it a palatable option in the future. And what’s really cool about this whole noisy process is that the pro-choice movement flexed its muscles and won.

Rise up! We are strong!


Sounds like a fair trade

I had no idea that the one true reason women get abortions is to avoid stretch marks. At least that’s how little Scotty on facebook explains the problem.

That’s an interesting exchange, too: so both sexes have to make sacrifices, with us men giving up porn, and women giving up 9 months of their life and the pristine smoothness of their abdominal connective tissue. Oh, and he probably expects the women to give up their careers and stay at home tending to the babies afterwards, as well. Those are perfectly comparable compromises.

I also really like the tortured reasoning in there to excuse his god from the crime of murder. He never murdered anyone, he only ordered “some slaying” (like, all but 8 people on the planet), and those were like totally justified because they were wicked.

Sometimes people accuse atheists of wanting to convert people. I have a deal: we won’t try to convert people like Scotty ever, not that rational arguments would matter to him. Nasty little maggots like that, we’d rather not have in the atheist camp, and they can all stay Christian.


News • Leaving America : Refugees from America

refugees from america.jpg

According to this article, with its nifty refugee map, we can clearly see America actually has, quite a large amount (1000-10000) of refugees leaving the country. (Yes, LEAVING!) That's more than Canada, and most "main" Europe. Where are they going? Here, I thought that I was the only one. Secondly, where do I sign up? I'd surely like to know which affliction to apply for asylum under. No healthcare? Expensive education? No more Geo Metros being sold new? WHAT?

Google does not provide much. A few instances of Muslims being threatened for deportation, though I am aware of at least one battered wife who sought asylum in Europe because returning back stateside would have been a murder sentence. It surely doesn't seem like anything enough to perpetuate the up-to 10,000 people running madly for the border.

That said, I have begun wondering about the EU and their little stance on free movement. If it's a human right to cross borders, (Shengen, etc.) then shouldn't it also apply to non-EU citizens as well? Before I run off and plead my case to European Court of Justice, I'll just assume idyllic humanity, and double standards aren't likely to benefit moi, any time soon.

I wonder if I become a refugee, if I'll look like this to the natives?

Statistics: Posted by Liv — February 7th, 2012, 6:51 pm — Replies 10 — Views 267


A Matter of Choice

If you’re like me, you have probably heard that people think you have actively chosen to disbelieve in God.

They insinuate that it’s just trendy right now. Like one day, you said, “Yes, I actually want to be the least trusted demographic in America. It’ll be cool.”

They propose that a belief in a higher power is the natural state of things, that babies are born believing, that it is as elemental as breathing. Their solution for your fall from grace is to simply submit to the balance of the universe, turn back to God, and “let” yourself believe in their particular recommended religion. Sounds easy, right?

Obviously, to that, any halfway respectable, sarcastic atheist would immediately challenge, “Please, for the sake of your argument, show me and choose to believe that dragons, griffons, and satyrs exist. Plenty of books throughout history, including the Bible, include accounts of these creatures!”

Throne of God background

Enter the cognitive dissonance, and most of the time, the conversation will abruptly end with, “Oh, now you’re just being silly.”

Well, here is the story of the time I chose to believe in God. Maybe it will help you understand that, for most of us, being an atheist was never a choice. It, in fact, was the natural state of things.

Unlike many of you, I am not an escapee from a traumatic religious upbringing. My family never shoved it down my throat, but I was actively involved in church. I never believed in the supernatural elements of it, though. Even in the earliest years, I was suspicious of the little gifts the youth preacher would hand out to all the children if we obediently listened to his stories about Jesus. I asked my mother why we got presents just for paying attention to stories from the Bible. Poor mom. I was five years old, and already realizing that perhaps there was an agenda afoot.

Anyway, I enjoyed parts of going to church. The children’s choir was fun. Vacation bible summer camp was great! Wednesday night spaghetti dinners were the bomb. Unlimited garlic bread? Hell yeah! Mostly, church was the time I got to see my best friend who lived across town. We would sneak out the back, crawling low behind the pews, to go practice making friendship bracelets and giggle over River Phoenix pictures in our Teen Beat magazines.

teen

Oh my, the irony of seeing Kirk Cameron here is flipping my shit!

Anyway, you see what I’m getting at? Even in the most reverent, ritualized, honored moments, such as confirmation or communion, I was just going through the ropes because that’s what I had to do to hang out with my friends.

And that, honestly, is what church really is to many, many Americans. A social scene. What is expected of us in our communities. I’m sure you are familiar with the irrational feelings of guilt and shame when a smiling busy-body would approach you after church and say, “We haven’t seen you in a while. Where have you been? We’d love to see more of you at church, ya hear?” Fuck you, Phyllis, I was hungover last Sunday!

Even as a child, I always hoped no one would realize that when I bowed my head to pray, I felt like I was just talking to myself and making selfish wishes in my head.

So one day, all us kids went off to a church weekend retreat. There was singing of Cumbaya all around. There were hand jobs under jackets during movies, drinking, and recreational drug use all around, too. Those religious kids. Don’t let ‘em fool you, parents!

tebox

On the last day, something happened. All of a sudden, the camp counselors came in carrying decorated bags, one for each of us. As we looked around, perplexed, while the counselors sung Jesus hymns, we saw that in those bags were hundreds of sentiments of love, cards, photographs, letters, small gifts, from every single person in our lives.

I saw a boy collapse crying after he read an apology from his abusive father. I saw a girl burst into tears when she read a loving plea for a truce from a sister with whom she fought constantly. I received a long, carefully written letter from the teacher who first took me under her wing when I was only three years old, who has followed me to this day with love and guidance. They were all there. Family, community leaders, long-lost friends, teachers. Somehow over the preceding months, our families had scoured our pasts to seek these words of encouragement and uplifting affection. And here it all was, poured out of colored sacks in our laps. It was one of the most moving moments of my adolescence.

The tears and emotion in the room were thick. Not one of us kids, just before sarcastic teenagers, now blubbering children, was unaffected. It was an intense group experience.

And just like speaking in tongues, just like witnessing a faith healing, just like when a virgin Mary statue cries real tears, our emotions had rendered us ready and willing.

We were instructed to leave the camper’s lounge and go out onto the campgrounds to find God’s love and thank Him for all the joy that we had just witnessed in our lives. We were forbidden to talk to anyone until the church bell rang, an hour later. The kids spread out, sniffling and red-eyed, to find their own solitary spot under a tree, on a fallen log, in a lone canoe in the middle of the lake, or huddled up in the fetal position like when your sparkly vampire boyfriend left you, to find God.

bella in woods

I remember my first thoughts were that finally today I might actually believe, and wouldn’t that be great? I would finally fit in with my church friends!

I chose a pine tree and sat under it. I listened to the birds, watched the clouds, and realized just how long one hour is when you are sitting under a tree and you are fourteen years old. I chose, right then, finally, to feel God. I willed it.

When my parents came to pick me up from camp that evening, among the goodbyes, hugs, and wishes of “Go with God,” I think, for the first time, I believed.

It was a great feeling! It was like a high. I kept replaying the emotional scene, re-reading those letters from all my friends and loved ones, pouring over the memories of how special all those words made me feel. I remember spreading those cards and presents out all over my bed the next week, and marveling at how many people loved me. I really was special, and it must be because of God!

I chose to trust what I had heard, that it was all because of God, even though something inside of me was trying to poke its head in and tell me, “Yes, you are special. You are loved. But you knew that already. And it doesn’t take a belief in Jesus for you to understand that you are a good person who will never be alone in this world.”

One week later, the feeling was gone.

I still treasured that experience, but not for the reasons they told me to. Not because there was something higher than myself and the amazing people who came to my side to make that day happen. In fact, I realized that, whatever the answers to the mysteries of life, whether there is a God or not, no one knows, it is how you live your life, what mark you leave on others, that counts.

Do you think you could find enough people in this world to write enough words of love and encouragement to fill a large canvas bag for you?

“The world is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion.” — Thomas Paine

The Joke’s On You

I guess that by virtue of me blogging about atheism, some religious people believe I want to either convert them or educate them about atheism. I don’t.

I’m not an atheist ambassador. I’m not an atheist apologist. I’m not an atheist evangelist. In fact, the only reason I care at all about what a person believes regarding the gods relates solely to my desire to observe and learn. I like hearing what people believe, because it is only through observing the religious first hand that I can come up with new ideas about atheism.

I notice a stale air around most atheists, a lack of originality that I imagine is largely due to many of them all reading the same works written by prominent atheists. It’s no skin off my back, but that isn’t what I could ever do; it would bore me. It makes for tedious reading to see dozens of people all parroting the same exact ideas, often in the same words.

I like to spice things up with jokes. I’m not sure humor expands the mind, but I know it sooths it. Sometimes humor can make you think, but usually it just does the opposite: it takes your mind off of things and brings you back here, in the moment. A good joke can make you forget all your worries, if only for a moment.

But some people don’t want to laugh. Some people seem to get their rocks off by feeling offended by everything. I always assume these people are stupid and didn’t get the joke. It’s perfectly normal for a joke to not be funny (I know that’s often the case with my jokes), but it’s entirely ludicrous that people get upset about a joke.

People just don’t like to feel laughed at, especially when talking about something they believe is very serious. If you go through life not being able to laugh at yourself, you will miss half the jokes. Why deny yourself that joy? If someone is laughing at you, join in, and suddenly they’re just laughing with you.

Religion is full of jokes. In fact, there’s no excuse for not seeing the humor in religion. Believers sometimes may whine about “respect,” but I have never met a person who doesn’t love a good religion joke… about someone else’s religion. The very same people who will try to shame you for telling a joke about their faith will laugh at a joke about Scientology, or Mormons, or Buddhists.

A joke directed at you or something you care about is supposed to keep you humble, and if you find the very idea of joking about something to be wrong, it’s because you have too much pride. You can’t trust a person who will laugh at others, but not themselves. Someone like that is bound to be a bad person.

I write to entertain, not to persuade or inform. Maybe someone learned something from reading my blog, or maybe someone even read a post that made them stop believing (though I doubt it), but that isn’t why I sit down to write. No, I sit down to write because it’s incredibly uncomfortable to type while standing… and because I like making corny jokes.

A Walk Around Cwmystradllyn


Cwmystradllyn is a valley (cwm means valley in Welsh) in North-West Wales, lying between the high moorland of the serene mountains Moel Hebog and Moel-Ddu. Both are aptly named 'moel' which signifies bare, or bald, as in the bald head of men like myself and, surely enough, hardly anything more than a few centimetres high grows above 100m altitude on either flank. You could visit the valley at any time of year, at many random opportunities, and leave with the notion that it was shrouded in a permanent damp mist, like a Scandinavian sauna sans heat. It is this ambience that draws me here to walk and contemplate. The quietness and stillness of the isolation blends naturally with the acoustic effects provided by the humidity, accentuating the mildly manic but seldom heard squeal of the buzzard, contrasting with the ubiquitous and monotonous rasping of the black crow.

Cwmystradllyn was not always so quiet. For eight brief years from 1859-1867, the mountainous dead-end of the valley was a hive of industry as the native Welsh workers in the English-owned and managed Gorseddau Quarry laboured in the damp and cold to hammer and dig slate out of the hillside. A small village was built for them in 1857 overlooking the lake, and named Treforys, and according to the census of 1861 there were thirty-six houses laid out in three streets, each possessing a quarter acre of acidic, peaty, sodden soil. The opportunity to supplement a quarry labourers wages by coaxing along a root crop or two and nurturing a few pigs, sheep or cows for meat and milk was always going to be an uneasy task.

The poet R S Thomas describes the futility of farming the hills of North Wales so well in "The Minister":

This is the land where they burn peat
If there is time for cutting it,
And the weather improves for drying it
And the cart is not too old for carrying it
And doesn’t get stuck in the wet bog.

By the next census in 1871 the village had been abandoned.


After being mined the Gorseddau slate was transported a few kilometres down the hillside by a horse-drawn railway to the the slate mill at Ynys Y Pandy. Because the Gorseddau slate was of poor quality, it was not suitable for hand milling into roof slates and so the quarry was unable to take advantage of this relatively new and burgeoning market. Instead, the slate slabs were used extensively for more traditional purposes such as flooring, window sills and gravestones, but in the eight years of operation, the quarry never returned a profit.

With it's high vaulted ceiling, church windows, seemingly continuous leaden grey sky, and the throaty caw-caw of endlessly circling crows, Ynys Y Pandy mill more resembles the romantic ruin of a medieval cathedral than a factory. Which is fitting, as Ynys Y Pandy sits on land previously owned by the early medieval Augustinian priory at Beddgelert. After closure of the quarry the building was often used for religious services before Capel Saron was built nearby in the 1880s, along with a small school to service the scattered farms.

It is important to emphasise the distinction in Welsh society between 'chapel' (Welsh; capel) and 'church' (Welsh; Eglwys) The Anglican tradition in Wales had long been associated with cultural 'Englishness' and 'landlordism' and for the 'aspiring' Welsh who spoke English by choice, even when their own language was fully understood and fluently spoken. In other words, attending church was a prime social indicator of influence and wealth.

Because of this, until the 1700s the organised, state-sponsored religion of the church had relatively little impact on the lives of the majority Welsh-speaking tenant population of North Wales. About 1730, however, a Nonconformist revival, initiated by Baptists and Methodists, swept through Wales. This revival lasted well into the period between the world wars and was characterised by the building of myriad plain, rectangular chapels, minus steeple or bell, in which fiery sermons voiced a disapproval of alcohol, gambling, dancing and games, and working on a Sunday. For fervent chapel goers this included a pacifist stance and a refusal to fight in wartime. What really marked the chapel culture out as different, however, and endeared the movement to the common people was that chapel services and preaching were done exclusively through the medium of Welsh (and still is for the relatively few chapels that remain). Thus, whereas in neighbouring England the various Christian denominations often cut across social divisions and to some degree neutralised them, in Wales the opposite was the case and social distinctions coincided with, and were intensified by, differences in both Christian denomination and language.

Arguably, the effect that chapel culture had on the native Welsh population cannot be overestimated and the chapel was, for over 150 years, the principle symbol of Welshness in every town and village in North Wales. The Sunday schools run by individual chapels taught many thousands of children and adults to read and write in Welsh long before primary schooling became universally available (and then available only in English, a policy which was rigidly enforced even at the local level). Indeed, a government report into the state of education in Wales in 1847 remarked that the Sunday schools were "the main instrument of civilsation in North Wales" and that "their schools, literature and religious pursuits ...have cultivated talents for preaching and poetry". Nevertheless, as with much faith-based education even today, a distinct narrowness of the curriculum was also observed, "but for every other calling they are incapacitated".

It is fair to say that the chapels attempted to appropriate the enthusiasm for story-telling and music that the Welsh have in common with the other Celtic nations for their own religious and nationalist ends. With hindsight, however, they succeeded on only one front. While chapel culture has undergone a massive decline since the mid-20th Century, with the majority of chapels now lying dormant or sold on for private home conversions, the growth of a specifically Welsh political consciousness has had some success, and for several years in the early part of this century the nationalist party Plaid Cymru achieved coalition in the Welsh government. The threat of a rise in Welsh nationalism due to chapel attendance was apparent much earlier than this, however, with at least one English landowner publicly insisting that her tenants become members of the Church of England or be made homeless.

This ready acceptance of separatism and discrimination between social and ethnic groups, in addition to ideological schisms, appears to be a hallmark of Christianity generally and so not confined to the Welsh scene. The faithfully preserved working museums that are the Anglican churches found in many English villages, usually many centuries old, readily attest to this fact. In addition to the handsome lychgates and intricately carved wooden rood screens, most churches have an area of wider, more comfortable wooden seating, again with intricate carvings often depicting a coat of arms. These seats, known as 'box pews' were reserved for the wealthier denizens and usually entranced through small wooden gates so they did not have to worship immediately alongside the peasantry. In other instances, divisions were based not on wealth but on skin colour. In the United States many African-Americans established their own churches after being banned from or made unwelcome in churches used by people of European origin. As Martin Luther King commented "It is appalling that the most segregated hour of Christian America is 11 o'clock on Sunday morning". Even today, across the United States churches with either exclusively or predominantly white and black congregations are the norm rather than the exception. In the UK, a similar situation exists in modern day London and other major cities. In apartheid South Africa of course, it was a legal requirement that churches discriminate between ethnic groups.


The majority of the inhabitants of Treforys were likely to have been monoglot Welsh-speaking chapel-goers although they had no local chapel to attend and, not unlike the experience of African-Americans, would have felt uncomfortable and unwelcome at the nearest 'English' churches located either across country at Llanfihangel-Y-Pennant in the adjoining and much more lush Cwm Pennant, or by road at Dolbenmaen. They would have needed to travel even further on foot or, if they were lucky enough to own one, by horse and cart to one of the chapels in Porthmadog, a journey that would have probably taken up most of their one day of rest.

Nowadays what remains of Cwmystradllyn is a handful of scattered farmhouses interspersed with a few modern houses that stand out like occasional lego bricks tossed at random onto the ancient landscape. And in some ways times have changed little; several cottages in various states of renovation are owned as holiday homes by the wealthy English (and seemingly scarcely used; one even has two not-quite vintage Jaguars rotting away alongside). To emphasise the extent of the colonisation, both Capel Saron and the old school next-door are now holiday homes. In some of these dwellings I have not seen a single inhabitant in a decade and wonder if these modern day colonists appreciate the subtle yet powerful part they have played, both then and now, in the continuing demise of a close knit and culturally vibrant Welsh-speaking slate mining and farming community? As my walk ends and I stroll back to my car through a cool sauna and the finest aerosol of drizzle, I think better to leave the place to those who disturb it least; to the bird-watchers, hikers and fishermen and anyone else who is happiest when sharing the quietude of this valley with the majestic soaring buzzard and the furtively dashing black crow.



Images #1 ('Treforys'), #2 (Pont-Y-Pandy') & #4 ('Decline Of The Family Farm') are from Cwmystradllyn and taken in 2010 and 2011. Image #3 ('Eglwys Llanfihangel-Y-Pennant') is from Cwm Pennant and taken in 2011. All captured on a Pentax K20D camera and Sigma 17-70mm lens.

Be Not Unequally Yoked With Unbelievers

This is becoming a recurring theme among my Christian friends on Facebook. Here's the latest:

Maybe I'm feeling more sensitive about this because I've been extremely ill the past two days. Maybe it's because I'm just tired of seeing shit like this. I hate the fact that people I care about a lot feel the need to keep "my kind" at arm's length (or further). It's disheartening, insulting, and hurtful.

Dead-Logic

Questions for My Wife

Polly is not a writer like I am. She is currently taking classes at  NW State Community College and will graduate in May. She is not a big fan of writing papers…… she sees a blog post as a scary writing project. She wants to share her story but she would like to do it in a question/answer format.

So……I am asking you…….what questions would you like to ask Polly? Please leave them in the comments and I will forward them on to her.

Thanks for your help.

Rapper Gripp Releases Atheism-Themed Album

A rapper by the name of Marshall “Gripp” Gillson (also a 2009 graduate of Morehouse College) is independently releasing (PDF) an album today called Head in the Cloud.

Several of the singles from it have atheistic themes, including the song “The Future Goes“:

An excerpt from the lyrics (at the 1:14 mark):

So when we say that we’re better than you/ essentially that//
is to say that we pay attention to facts//
So come with us. We can teach you every attack//
the pseudoscientific mindset sets in a trap//
You will never go back/ Once you’re given the awe//
it’s grander than any caricature religion could draw//
I had a vision of all/ of us in a prison of straw men//
My mission is to make sure they ain’t winning this war//
So the battle lines are drawn in the sand/ ‘cos all that I am//
is a man/ shaping his logical thoughts to a plan/ Damn//
We need clear heads to get out of this mess//
So tell religious leaders step aside; it’s probably best/ Yes//

Who needs Gospel music when there’s Godless rapping to be spread?

Buy the album and keep this sort of thing going!

Humanists Applaud Clear Federal Court Ruling Overturning California Gay Marriage Ban

Humanists and atheists are hopeful that the strong decision issued today by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals overturning a gay marriage ban in California will be upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court. Related articles:
  1. CFI Hails Federal Court Ruling Striking Down Proposition 8
  2. Nonbelievers Applaud Court Ruling to Remove Religious Banner from Rhode Island Public School
  3. Humanists Hail Ruling on Defense of Marriage Act


Why Are Atheists So Hated In America?

These are not my words, but I felt like they answered the question so thoroughly that they needed as much exposure as possible:

Redditor CiderDrinker's comment on the topic Why are atheists so hated in the USA?:

Ok, a few answers to this:

(1) America was settled, at least initially, by religious fundamentalists who wanted to set up a sort of theocratic republic (before anyone jumps down my throat and says, "The founding fathers were not Christians" - yes, I know, I'm not talking about Jefferson or Paine or Franklin, the people who signed the Declaration of Independence and wrote the US Constitution - I'm talking about the people who went to America in the 1600s. This left a DEEP cultural idea in the American people that they were a 'chosen people' living in a 'promised land' etc. God loves America; so for an American not to love God back is seen as a sort of treason.

(2) The popular religion that developed in the USA, especially along the frontier and in the South, was anti-intellectual. Unlike in Italy, where the Catholics have a hierarchy and a trained priesthood, the dominant form of Christianity in the USA comes out of evangelical traditions and 'revivalism', where anyone with a spattering of Bible knowledge and a good shouting voice could start a church. This led to a very simplistic, literalist, bible-based theology. The broader education and humanist philosophy of the priests in catholic (and anglican and lutheran) churches in Europe mitigated against this trend and produced a religion which is in some ways more 'porous'.

(3) More generally, the USA has an anti-intellectual culture. In most of continental Europe people look up to and respect 'book learning' and being a civilised, cultured human being. In the USA (in most parts) this would be looked down on - it's what you DO that matters, how much money you make. This anti-intellectualism means that those who have a rational, scientific view of existence can easily be criticised as being 'out of touch' with 'good honest god-fearing Americans'. (Read in redneck voice): 'Them danged atheists thinks they is better than us folks, just cos they done got themselves a college edjikatishion'. It's like the horrible reverse parody of the democratic ethos.

(4) Being part of a protestant church is a major commitment. It's not something you just do as a social ritual, like catholicism can be. You have to make a choice, profess Jesus, get baptised by immersion, sign the members' roll, turn up to meetings, sit on committees. This tends to harden the edges of the 'in-group' and the 'out-group'. In a catholic country, everyone (or nearly so) is culturally catholic, even if they do not believe in god or go to church; you can't be a 'cultural baptist' - you are either In or Out (and, according to the Ins, everything Out is evil).

(5) After the second world war, the USA had a massive internal propaganda system designed to attack socialism and the left. Communists were 'atheists', Communists were bad and anti-American, ergo atheists were bad and anti-American.

(6) The USA does not have a good welfare system. Indeed, the whole country is based on a sort of individualist myth, where the only reason that one guy is working 70 hours a week and struggling to get by with two minimum wage jobs and no healthcare, while someone sits by their pool and has a private jet, is that the first one is 'lazy' (i.e. unfavoured by God - remember, Protestant God Wants You to Work Hard) and the second is 'hardworking' (i.e. Blessed by God). This means that: (i) there is a lot of fear - fear of sickness, fear of unemployment, fear of annoying the boss, fear of random economic actions outside your control. Fear drives people into fearful, nasty, exclusive versions of religion - a 'hunker down' against 'the world'; (ii) people need the social network and support provided by a church, because the state provides so little - thus atheists are a threat to people because people are terrified of being convinced by them, having to leave the church, and thus losing their social network and support system.

(7) This is the crucial one - it draws on 1 and 5, but goes beyond them and is vitally relevant today: There is, in the USA, a thing called 'Christianity' that has little to do with Christianity as it is generally understood in Europe, or in the longer view of the Christian tradition. It is a heavily nationalistic, militaristic, masculine, authoritarian cult, with Jesus as the Cadillac-Driving All-American Hero who has come to save his Chosen People from Gayness, Socialised Medicine, Arabs and Long Haired Hippies. This might best be called, "Amerireligion". This was deliberately created after the 1960s by the American right, who wanted a way to stop the changes begun by the Progressive Era and the New Deal and to restore the dominance of the old ruling class. The civil rights and anti-vietnam war era brought it to a head. The right saw an opportunity to appeal to the gut-instincts of the white working class blue collar American male by playing on his prejudices - particularly on matters such as race, alternative lifestyles and the sexual revolution. So there was a deliberate demonisation and vilification of those who were seen as 'different' from that red-blooded white-skinned American male ideal - they were 'liberal hippy tree hugging dirty commie atheist bastards' - not to be trusted, because they were 'anti-American' (when 'American' is defined by the hard right). So, basically, American christians hate atheists because their religion is really a sort of tribal nationalism, and they've been played for fools by right-wing politicians.

How do you get poor and middle class people to vote for tax cuts for billionaires, constant war, erosion of civil liberties, and destruction of public services? Easy, tell them that if they don't American Jesus will cry - and then the Gays and the Foreigners and the Nasty Atheists - and all who don't Love American Jesus will continue to shaft them. Why are they unemployed? Not because NAFTA killed the jobs, but because God angry with America for teaching evolution. It's the ultimate 'bait-n-switch'. So what's the answer to the current economic crisis - the worst in American history since the Great Depression? Is it a massive public investment and job-creation programme like FDR did? No, that would be Communistic Atheism. Instead, we must appease the All-Blessing God of America - by banning pornography!

The level of cognitive dissonance must be overwhelming. Faced with that, no wonder so many American Christians act with rage and hostility to the mere presence of atheists.

It's sad.

The religious right is essentially an underclass created for the purpose of keeping certain people in power. Why are these games played? Why is power so important?

Gay Marriage and Male Friendship

This is a guest post for a debate on the consequences of gay marriage.  The opinions expressed below are fairly obviously not my own.  Oh, but I did do the pictures. This week at Yale an undergraduate organization known as … Continue reading

How many IRS agents does it take to answer one simple question?

English: Anti-United States Internal Revenue S...

Seven and counting.  I called the IRS the other day with what I thought was a very simple question.

I am convinced that our government employs people whose job description is to take very simple processes and tasks and make them as complicated as possible.  In my mind my seventy-two minute IRS call is proof of that theory.  The first woman I spoke with made the question a bit more complex, gave me a partial answer and said I would need to be transferred to another department.  This was repeated six more times, with each agent making the question even more complex that it barely resembled my original question.  After the seventh agent said I would need to be transferred to yet another department I was experiencing bureaucratic overload and declined saying I would call back another time.  I won’t, because I don’t think I will get an answer and perhaps use up another seventy-two minutes of my life I can never get back.    They apparently have a department for every single line on every one of their myriad tax forms.

Upon calling the IRS before you even speak to an agent you hear a recorded disclaimer informing you that the information they give you isn’t necessarily correct or to be relied upon.  So let me get this straight… IRS employees are not expected to know all the codes and rules, yet when we file our tax returns there are stiff fines and penalties if we get them wrong!  That’s  just rhymes with mucked up.

I have a feeling all of our government agencies are run in similarly inefficient fashion and this could be one of the many reasons our government is hemorrhaging money faster than a broken water main.

_______________________________________________

            At the end of the tax year, the IRS office sent an inspector to audit the
             books of a local hospital.  While the IRS agent was checking the books, he
             turned to the CFO of the hospital and said, “I notice you buy a lot of
             bandages.  What do you do with the end of the roll when there’s too little
             left to be of any use?”

            “Good question,” noted the CFO.  “We save them up and send them back to the
             bandage company and every once in a while, they send us a free roll.”

             “Oh,” replied the auditor, somewhat disappointed that his unusual question
             had a practical answer.

             But on he went, in his obnoxious way.  “What about all these plaster
             purchases?  What do you do with what’s left over after setting a cast on a
             patient?”

             “Ah, yes,” replied the CFO, realizing that the inspector was
             trying to trap him with an unanswerable question.  “We save it and send it
             back to the manufacturer, and every so often they will send us a free bag of
             plaster.”

             “I see,” replied the auditor, thinking hard about how he could fluster the
             know-it-all CFO.  “Well,” he went on, “What do you do with all the remains
             from the circumcision surgeries?”

            “Here, too, we do not waste,” answered the CFO.  “What we do is save all the
             little foreskins and send them to the IRS office, and about once a year they
             send us a complete prick.”

Check out Humor Blogs.


Filed under: government waste, humor, taxes Tagged: Internal Revenue Service, IRS, irs agent, IRS humor, IRS tax forms, Tax, Tax return (United States)

She Wanted a Secular Wedding… So She Told Her Family About Her Atheism

You want to know why campus atheist groups are so important?

The blogger at Faithless and Fulfilled tells her story:

When I arrived at college I met people of many different faiths and people with no faith at all. I met normal, moral, happy people who happened to be atheist. The contradiction between what I’d been told about non-religious people, and the actual non-religious people I met was so stark, that I was forced to actually examine some of my beliefs. I began gradually, by simply allowing myself to question what I’d been taught. It took practice. At first I was overcome by guilt anytime I would permit myself to think, “Well, what if that’s wrong?” Eventually, though, once I truly opened my mind, all of the walls came tumbling down. I felt that I’d been duped. How could I have been so stupid? Religion was a bad joke and I’d fallen for it, hook line and sinker.

Over the next year, I began really developing my own ideals, morals, and purpose, and I slowly started speaking out. I use the label atheist, because I know it is a taboo. I want people to get to know me and to realize I am a normal, moral human being, and then learn… oh by the way, I also don’t believe in god. I truly believe the only way to change the negative stereotypes surrounding being an atheist, is to show that world that there are lots of normal atheists that contribute to the good of this country every day.

If you keep reading the initial post on her blog, though, you realize it’s not so easy for her to come out to her family. They’ve basically exiled her ever since she told them she didn’t believe in a god and wanted a secular wedding.

It’s rarely an easy journey.

My parents and I barely talk about this website and it’s been part of my identity for years now. They try to change the subject if I ever mention the site or that I’m traveling to speak somewhere. It took a long while for them to not be angry about it and now they sort of accept it. I’ll take that for now…

In any case, I’m keeping tabs on this blog because I want to see how F&F’s journey pans out. Hopefully, it’ll get better for her over time. It definitely helps to be out and proud about it online :)

Its the annual panicked SBL [in]decision time again.

It’s time for Dr. Jim to start thinking about what sort of papers to propose for November’s Society of Biblical Literature meeting in Chicago as the deadline is fast approaching. I’ve never been to Chicago, so this is going to be a treat.  But what sort of paper to do?  I wish I had a mind to make up.

Since I’m working on Hebrew Bible mythology, I suppose I should do a paper on that, but the Bible, Myth and Myth Theory session is really encouraging New Testament papers this time around, but they might have room for one on ancient Israel and the Old Testament as a mythic places and spaces for thought in modern religion, (relying on Burton Mack, J. Z. Smith, Wendy Doniger).

I’m on the steering committee of the Israelite Prophetic Literature Program Unit, but I don’t feel right proposing papers for sessions I’m helping to plan and for which I have to evaluate other folks’ abstracts. I’m also on the steering committee for the proposed Secular Biblical Criticism  program unit which will probably go through a name change before gaining final approval. If we get a session this year (as we did last year) I do have  a few papers in mind, but since we have had to have 4 or 5  sessions pencilled in (we had to come up with a multi-year plan for the application to prove we could sustain interest), it would depend what the other folks on the committee thought best to … Continue reading