I'm basking in the first blizzard of the year which always makes me introspective; introspection always leads me to wonder if I'm making the best possible choices in life - am I as happy as I could be? what makes me happy?
List of things thats currently make me happy (in no particular order):
1.
Hot Drinks2.
Time to pursue my own interests/whims3.
Taking photos4.
Yoga5. Time with loved ones
6.
Good Food7. New blazing-fast
Mac Book Pro8.
LaughingIn honor of #8 here is are some more Photos That Make Me Laugh (with links to more!)
From
Awkward Family Photos (.com)
From
Nietzsche Family Circus


From the best photo blog ever:
Picture This (NSFW)

I'm basking in the first blizzard of the year which always makes me introspective; introspection always leads me to wonder if I'm making the best possible choices in life - am I as happy as I could be? what makes me happy?
List of things thats currently make me happy (in no particular order):
1.
Hot Drinks2.
Time to pursue my own interests/whims3.
Taking photos4.
Yoga5. Time with loved ones
6.
Good Food7. New blazing-fast
Mac Book Pro8.
LaughingIn honor of #8 here is are some more Photos That Make Me Laugh (with links to more!)
From
Awkward Family Photos (.com)
From
Nietzsche Family Circus


From the best photo blog ever:
Picture This (NSFW)

My B.S. degree is in "Conservation" which included a variety of environmental science classes. But I now think conservation is the worst way to address our climatic/energy problems.
People suck at conserving - we're generally glutinous monsters which consume mindlessly and then are surprised when our resource dries up, and then quickly move on to the next consumable.
Its useless denying this instinct, its actually a very puritan technique - to deny our instincts - and you all know how successful that strategy has been
We need to develop sustainable ways of generating energy and encourage people to consume, consume, consume from those energy sources, so they will economically out-compete the fossil fuels.
What if we could develop methods of generating energy that actually cleaned the air, or the water, or had a net positive benefit? Wouldn't it be mind-blowing to have environmentalists telling you to leave your lights on and drive like a mad-man because the energy your using is good for the environment. That's a message I think most people could embrace.
My B.S. degree is in "Conservation" which included a variety of environmental science classes. But I now think conservation is the worst way to address our climatic/energy problems.
People suck at conserving - we're generally glutinous monsters which consume mindlessly and then are surprised when our resource dries up, and then quickly move on to the next consumable.
Its useless denying this instinct, its actually a very puritan technique - to deny our instincts - and you all know how successful that strategy has been
We need to develop sustainable ways of generating energy and encourage people to consume, consume, consume from those energy sources, so they will economically out-compete the fossil fuels.
What if we could develop methods of generating energy that actually cleaned the air, or the water, or had a net positive benefit? Wouldn't it be mind-blowing to have environmentalists telling you to leave your lights on and drive like a mad-man because the energy your using is good for the environment. That's a message I think most people could embrace.
I just wrote an article for eHow entitled
How to be a Spiritual Atheist.
I'm sure many of you have thoughts on this! Please read the article and leave your comments!
I just wrote an article for eHow entitled
How to be a Spiritual Atheist.
I'm sure many of you have thoughts on this! Please read the article and leave your comments!
This website is awesome! It has downloadable pdfs of papercraft deep sea creatures. I'm having a hard time focusing on working knowing what papery fun I'll be having tonight :)
This website is awesome! It has downloadable pdfs of papercraft deep sea creatures. I'm having a hard time focusing on working knowing what papery fun I'll be having tonight :)
I wonder which one is Diane? Or are they all "Dianes"?
click for big
I wonder which one is Diane? Or are they all "Dianes"?
click for big
Recently, Tim Boyle
commented on one of my posts with a good-hearted passionate rant bemoaning the wonton wasteful tradition of christmas trees.
After some discussion and research we discovered that the environmental, cultural, and economic impacts of the christmas tree industry are unexpectedly tangled, with potentially an overall benefit to the environment. Keep an eye on
Tim's blog as he may post a more comprehensive report of his findings.
This reminds me of a talk I attended a couple months ago by a researcher who partnered with major magazines to figure out where all their physical manufacturing materials come from and where they ultimately end up. This was the first literal translation of following a product from cradle to grave that I have come across. It was pretty interesting but left a lot questions, which I think could be answered by economists, paper making specialists, or psychologists.
For example, much of the wood for the paper was coming from great distances instead of using local wood. They use this wood because it is somehow cheaper, despite the transportation costs (perhaps an economist could explain this is due to international taxes or something, or a paper making expert might explain that the trees from the far location are superior paper pulp producers). He also discovered that the companies print and send an excess percentage (15% ? ) of magazines to vendors which never sell and end up in the waste stream (would a psychologist tell us that a larger stack of magazines makes them more desirable and more likely that someone will buy one?).
So, just like our discovery with the christmas trees the magazine biz is a wadded-up ball of economic, environmental, and social costs and benefits.
I think this means that there is benefit in being humble, observant, and flexible in forming our judgements and beliefs about life. I especially identify with this as an environmentalist. So frequently things are cast in black and white creating good and bad people, animals, products, businesses, or organizations. As a naturalist I was asked about almost everything, "is this good or bad?" when really the answer was neither and both.
Recently, Tim Boyle
commented on one of my posts with a good-hearted passionate rant bemoaning the wonton wasteful tradition of christmas trees.
After some discussion and research we discovered that the environmental, cultural, and economic impacts of the christmas tree industry are unexpectedly tangled, with potentially an overall benefit to the environment. Keep an eye on
Tim's blog as he may post a more comprehensive report of his findings.
This reminds me of a talk I attended a couple months ago by a researcher who partnered with major magazines to figure out where all their physical manufacturing materials come from and where they ultimately end up. This was the first literal translation of following a product from cradle to grave that I have come across. It was pretty interesting but left a lot questions, which I think could be answered by economists, paper making specialists, or psychologists.
For example, much of the wood for the paper was coming from great distances instead of using local wood. They use this wood because it is somehow cheaper, despite the transportation costs (perhaps an economist could explain this is due to international taxes or something, or a paper making expert might explain that the trees from the far location are superior paper pulp producers). He also discovered that the companies print and send an excess percentage (15% ? ) of magazines to vendors which never sell and end up in the waste stream (would a psychologist tell us that a larger stack of magazines makes them more desirable and more likely that someone will buy one?).
So, just like our discovery with the christmas trees the magazine biz is a wadded-up ball of economic, environmental, and social costs and benefits.
I think this means that there is benefit in being humble, observant, and flexible in forming our judgements and beliefs about life. I especially identify with this as an environmentalist. So frequently things are cast in black and white creating good and bad people, animals, products, businesses, or organizations. As a naturalist I was asked about almost everything, "is this good or bad?" when really the answer was neither and both.
I'm so doing this! The BYOS (bring-your-own-sled) workshop is Jan. 31s and sledding smackdown is the Feb. 7.
I'm so doing this! The BYOS (bring-your-own-sled) workshop is Jan. 31s and sledding smackdown is the Feb. 7.