Author Archive for Teenage Atheist

An exuent.

As you may or may not have noticed, I have been more or less absent from the blog for the past few months. I apologise if I left anyone hanging for a post or response, I have been enjoying my final few months of peace before my return to school. As it happens, I am also heading into an aggravatingly important academic year which will be deciding my college and course placement. Because of this, I am regretful to admit that this means that my absence will only continue. 

My ethos for the year is simple: work hard, play hard, and I plan to stick to it. Unfortunately, even though I thoroughly enjoy blogging, it falls under neither heading and so you won't be seeing much of me for a number of months. I must give priority to school and, of course, I must have some form of escapism (outside of writing/blogging), hence the 'play hard' addendum.

I do, however, plan to return. Whether it be under this alias or another, I will be blogging again at a later date. I guess I just enjoy it too much. I've put too much effort into this blog to take it down, so don't forget to browse the archives!

So, before I impart, farewell for now readers! Stay sound, reasonable and happy! Take pride in your atheism and spread ripples of logic where ever you can. 

Peace out!


What happens when faith overvalues evidence…

I came across this randomly the other day. It's a quirky and comical way of demonstrating the fallacy of faith so I figured I'd share. I don't know who the author is so I can't credit, but enjoy it anyway.


Why we bother… Guest Post

Here's a wonderful guest post written by Isaac Wolfe from the Sexy Atheist. Enjoy!
___


It was Christmas night, 2009, when I finally decided that my threshold for bullshit had gotten clogged, and so help me I would clean it out with my bare hands.

I laid in my sister’s bed – the only bed in the house – underneath three duvets, as my sister couldn’t afford to heat the house much above 50°, the absolute minimum. From the living room, I could hear the sobs of my sister (who slept on the couch) as well – she had received a very offensive gift from our father. Tears slid down my face, and I absolutely wept, feeling that I was responsible for the whole predicament. Actually, I kind of was.
What the hell, world.
After a long, harrowing spiral, I had finally crashed with a bang on the floor of a bottomless pit. Months ago, I had lived in a fancy, middle class house with my father, complete with a plasma TV, a grand piano, and a mother-fucking chandelier. Now I lived in a three room apartment with my sister – a bedroom, a bathroom, and a living room / kitchen.  We’ve subsided on rice, ramen noodles, and extremely salty canned food. Exclusively.
I was scared shitless about the future. So, I did something very instinctual, and, well, rather hypocritical.
Prayed.
That’s right, I, Isaac Wolfe, atheist and sexy teen extraordinaire, prayed. It was a funny sight, really. Wearing nothing more than my boxers, I was just a curled-up lump on a mattress. Enjoy:
I’m pretty sure you don’t exist, but hey, there’s no harm trying, right? It’s me. Yeah, that kid who got caught skinny dipping in the creek that one time – but seriously, you don’t expect families to have picnics that far upstream! But, that’s besides the point.
The reason I’m here tonight, is, well, because I’m kind of in a predicament right now. A suckish one. I've heard you're omnipotent and all, so I suppose you know the details. Wanna, uh, help me out? If it's no trouble?
Um. Thanks.
Bye.
…Are you still there? I said bye. Get off the line.
///
So how did I end up in this sticky situation? Well, let’s start at the beginning.
For most of my life, I lived with my mother. We loved each other, absolutely and irrevocably. So, when an opportunity came up in Florida, which involved a lifestyle she had always dreamed of but didn’t include me, I severed ties with her in the only way that would work: telling her that I couldn’t stand living with her, that I was moving to my father’s house and she was leaving to Florida, that’s that. I followed through, and so did she.
Unfortunately, there was a problem. My father was – is – a fundamentalist, conservative Christian with anger problems to match. That was all fine and dandy at the time – my mom was a casual Catholic, and I supposed that I loosely believed in God as well, so it wasn’t too different. The only contrasting thing was that now I had to go to church every Sunday, instead perhaps a couple time a year. That was fine with me – Christianity was fascinating, especially the reactions it invoked. I was content for a time, and so was my father.
Until I figured out that my attraction to other men wasn’t just a phase.
Until, at the local library, I picked up a book called The God Delusion in passive interest.
Until my father, after installing spyware on my laptop, found out what these two things had resulted in.
And that was that. After enduring screaming and threats, a forced encounter with a ‘re-orientation therapist’ who tried to tell me that my sexuality was to be feared and hated, and finally a physical encounter, I was out on the cold October streets, with nothing more than a duffel bag full of clothes and a backpack full of textbooks.
I had basically nowhere to go – my mom was essentially excised from my life, and telling any of my friends about the whole ordeal would likely culminate with an investigation by child services, destroying any chance of me seeing my father again. However, in a burst of intuition, I walked to a café on the other side of town, where I waited for my sister to arrive at her shift. Without even requiring an explanation, she took me in.
We survived, barely, my sister working overtime, paying not for only one mouth but two. In school, contrary to intuitive thought, my grades skyrocketed as I put on a fake cheerful mien to erase any suspicion that something in my home life was awry.
Which, eventually, brings us back to Christmas night, and my adventure praying to a non-existent sugar daddy. Gift-wise, that night, I received a journal and some shabby books of my sister’s that I could have borrowed any time I wanted. My sister, from our father, received a five dollar bill taped to a piece of paper that condemned her for harboring me and told her that she was going to Hell.
As you may have guessed, after my plea for help, I waited.
And I waited.
And you know what happened, babycakes? Absolutely nothing.
So, after crying some more and waiting for my sister’s sobs to turn into snores, I put on some clothes and walked across town to my father’s house, where I snuck in through the window (unlocked, just as I had left it) and took the laptop from my room (which I had left there, for some stupid reason). And then, when I got back to my sister’s apartment, I opened the laptop, connected to the Wi-Fi of the nearby McDonalds, and sent off about ten e–mails to the first businesses I had come across online, telling them that their websites were dull and that I wanted to rewrite them for a small price.
None of them responded. Except for one.
Within a week, I was two-hundred dollars richer. I surprised my sister by whisking her out to a fancy Italian restaurant, and telling her to order anything her little heart desired, except for the mushroom raviolis because god, seriously, they’re disgusting. And then from there, everything got awesome. Web copywriting became an actual source of income, and my sister and I stopped living like weird Asian hobos.
Now, you’re probably wondering: what the hell is the moral of this story?
A while ago, I received an e-mail from a man, who compared me to an odd bunny rabbit that liked to jump up and down and point out that the tooth fairy wasn’t real. I’m an atheist too, he wrote, but I don’t understand why you’re trying to take away religion from people. It might not be your cup of tea, but why try to get rid of it for the people it means something to?
That’s where my story comes in handy. We atheist bloggers are not trying to exterminate religion as a whole (usually), we’re trying to exterminate the kind that causes people to attack their children, the kind that makes people fly themselves into the side of buildings. Are you a liberal Christian who can differentiate between what’s obviously a reflection of the social times in the Bible and what’s the core message? Awesome, you rock, join the party.
People like Raithie and I aren’t trying to be some big meanies taking away some precious part of your life. We’re just trying to prevent sob stories like this, by giving people the ammunition and awareness to determine their beliefs with, or if necessary, fight with.

The fact of the matter is that there are many kids in the situations similar to that I described, and the fact of the matter is that they probably aren’t as bad ass as me and they won’t find a way to fix it.

And, as sad as it is, at the end of the day, some god will not come down and fix their lives for them.


Why we bother… Guest Post

Here's a wonderful guest post written by Isaac Wolfe from the Sexy Atheist. Enjoy!
___


It was Christmas night, 2009, when I finally decided that my threshold for bullshit had gotten clogged, and so help me I would clean it out with my bare hands.

I laid in my sister’s bed – the only bed in the house – underneath three duvets, as my sister couldn’t afford to heat the house much above 50°, the absolute minimum. From the living room, I could hear the sobs of my sister (who slept on the couch) as well – she had received a very offensive gift from our father. Tears slid down my face, and I absolutely wept, feeling that I was responsible for the whole predicament. Actually, I kind of was.
What the hell, world.
After a long, harrowing spiral, I had finally crashed with a bang on the floor of a bottomless pit. Months ago, I had lived in a fancy, middle class house with my father, complete with a plasma TV, a grand piano, and a mother-fucking chandelier. Now I lived in a three room apartment with my sister – a bedroom, a bathroom, and a living room / kitchen.  We’ve subsided on rice, ramen noodles, and extremely salty canned food. Exclusively.
I was scared shitless about the future. So, I did something very instinctual, and, well, rather hypocritical.
Prayed.
That’s right, I, Isaac Wolfe, atheist and sexy teen extraordinaire, prayed. It was a funny sight, really. Wearing nothing more than my boxers, I was just a curled-up lump on a mattress. Enjoy:
I’m pretty sure you don’t exist, but hey, there’s no harm trying, right? It’s me. Yeah, that kid who got caught skinny dipping in the creek that one time – but seriously, you don’t expect families to have picnics that far upstream! But, that’s besides the point.
The reason I’m here tonight, is, well, because I’m kind of in a predicament right now. A suckish one. I've heard you're omnipotent and all, so I suppose you know the details. Wanna, uh, help me out? If it's no trouble?
Um. Thanks.
Bye.
…Are you still there? I said bye. Get off the line.
///
So how did I end up in this sticky situation? Well, let’s start at the beginning.
For most of my life, I lived with my mother. We loved each other, absolutely and irrevocably. So, when an opportunity came up in Florida, which involved a lifestyle she had always dreamed of but didn’t include me, I severed ties with her in the only way that would work: telling her that I couldn’t stand living with her, that I was moving to my father’s house and she was leaving to Florida, that’s that. I followed through, and so did she.
Unfortunately, there was a problem. My father was – is – a fundamentalist, conservative Christian with anger problems to match. That was all fine and dandy at the time – my mom was a casual Catholic, and I supposed that I loosely believed in God as well, so it wasn’t too different. The only contrasting thing was that now I had to go to church every Sunday, instead perhaps a couple time a year. That was fine with me – Christianity was fascinating, especially the reactions it invoked. I was content for a time, and so was my father.
Until I figured out that my attraction to other men wasn’t just a phase.
Until, at the local library, I picked up a book called The God Delusion in passive interest.
Until my father, after installing spyware on my laptop, found out what these two things had resulted in.
And that was that. After enduring screaming and threats, a forced encounter with a ‘re-orientation therapist’ who tried to tell me that my sexuality was to be feared and hated, and finally a physical encounter, I was out on the cold October streets, with nothing more than a duffel bag full of clothes and a backpack full of textbooks.
I had basically nowhere to go – my mom was essentially excised from my life, and telling any of my friends about the whole ordeal would likely culminate with an investigation by child services, destroying any chance of me seeing my father again. However, in a burst of intuition, I walked to a café on the other side of town, where I waited for my sister to arrive at her shift. Without even requiring an explanation, she took me in.
We survived, barely, my sister working overtime, paying not for only one mouth but two. In school, contrary to intuitive thought, my grades skyrocketed as I put on a fake cheerful mien to erase any suspicion that something in my home life was awry.
Which, eventually, brings us back to Christmas night, and my adventure praying to a non-existent sugar daddy. Gift-wise, that night, I received a journal and some shabby books of my sister’s that I could have borrowed any time I wanted. My sister, from our father, received a five dollar bill taped to a piece of paper that condemned her for harboring me and told her that she was going to Hell.
As you may have guessed, after my plea for help, I waited.
And I waited.
And you know what happened, babycakes? Absolutely nothing.
So, after crying some more and waiting for my sister’s sobs to turn into snores, I put on some clothes and walked across town to my father’s house, where I snuck in through the window (unlocked, just as I had left it) and took the laptop from my room (which I had left there, for some stupid reason). And then, when I got back to my sister’s apartment, I opened the laptop, connected to the Wi-Fi of the nearby McDonalds, and sent off about ten e–mails to the first businesses I had come across online, telling them that their websites were dull and that I wanted to rewrite them for a small price.
None of them responded. Except for one.
Within a week, I was two-hundred dollars richer. I surprised my sister by whisking her out to a fancy Italian restaurant, and telling her to order anything her little heart desired, except for the mushroom raviolis because god, seriously, they’re disgusting. And then from there, everything got awesome. Web copywriting became an actual source of income, and my sister and I stopped living like weird Asian hobos.
Now, you’re probably wondering: what the hell is the moral of this story?
A while ago, I received an e-mail from a man, who compared me to an odd bunny rabbit that liked to jump up and down and point out that the tooth fairy wasn’t real. I’m an atheist too, he wrote, but I don’t understand why you’re trying to take away religion from people. It might not be your cup of tea, but why try to get rid of it for the people it means something to?
That’s where my story comes in handy. We atheist bloggers are not trying to exterminate religion as a whole (usually), we’re trying to exterminate the kind that causes people to attack their children, the kind that makes people fly themselves into the side of buildings. Are you a liberal Christian who can differentiate between what’s obviously a reflection of the social times in the Bible and what’s the core message? Awesome, you rock, join the party.
People like Raithie and I aren’t trying to be some big meanies taking away some precious part of your life. We’re just trying to prevent sob stories like this, by giving people the ammunition and awareness to determine their beliefs with, or if necessary, fight with.

The fact of the matter is that there are many kids in the situations similar to that I described, and the fact of the matter is that they probably aren’t as bad ass as me and they won’t find a way to fix it.

And, as sad as it is, at the end of the day, some god will not come down and fix their lives for them.


Exams be calling

It's that time of the year again. 

So the reason for my inactivity lately isn't because I've grown lazy or disinterested in the blog; it's those damn exams. Ick. They'll be over within two weeks, however, so I hope to return to my regular posting schedule afterwards.

I realise my posting schedule has been quite choppy recently, and for that, I apologise. 
However, I will be back soon!

Ciao.


Exams be calling

It's that time of the year again. 

So the reason for my inactivity lately isn't because I've grown lazy or disinterested in the blog; it's those damn exams. Ick. They'll be over within two weeks, however, so I hope to return to my regular posting schedule afterwards.

I realise my posting schedule has been quite choppy recently, and for that, I apologise. 
However, I will be back soon!

Ciao.


A question for theists

If no god existed, would you still want to believe in one? 

The most interesting question still remains to be "if you're parents were Hindus instead of Christians, would you still be a Christian?" (presuming it is a Christian who is answering).

However, the former is still an interesting musing, methinks. Willful delusion certainly gets you out of the nasties and I think it could be revelatory of one of the motivations behind belief, of course, assuming the answerer is honest with themselves. Regardless, I think it's a worthwhile pondering and I'd be interested to hear a theists point of view on such a question.


A question for theists

If no god existed, would you still want to believe in one? 

The most interesting question still remains to be "if you're parents were Hindus instead of Christians, would you still be a Christian?" (presuming it is a Christian who is answering).

However, the former is still an interesting musing, methinks. Willful delusion certainly gets you out of the nasties and I think it could be revelatory of one of the motivations behind belief, of course, assuming the answerer is honest with themselves. Regardless, I think it's a worthwhile pondering and I'd be interested to hear a theists point of view on such a question.


Is trusting a scientist an act of faith?

An interesting comment came up on one of my posts recently. I figured it would be more appropriate to address it as a post as opposed to it getting lost in the comments section given the regularity I hear such a remark.
"Let's be real. You are proud that you "don't believe". However, if you are 17 years old as you say you are, you have not had the time to develop the scientific skills to prove what you claim to believe about evolution (as a source of life, the universe, and everything). Nor have you had the time to objectively examine the possibility of the existence of God or gods. You are exercising the same amount of faith as a devoutly religious person. So instead of saying that you don’t believe in God/gods, you would be more accurate to say that science is your god, seeing that you have chosen to blindly believe what scientist (or school teachers) have said. You have accepted the “findings” of others without applying the discipline to objectively search out the matter for yourself."
I'll deal with the first paragraph for now.

"Nor have you had the time to objectively examine the possibility of the existence of God or gods. You are exercising the same amount of faith as a devoutly religious person."

Objectively examine? I don't see any evidence and I have most certainly looked. If you can supply me with substantiated and incontrovertible evidence, I will most gladly accept the existence of your particular god. As for the semantic arguments for deities, I find none of them in any way compelling and most can and have, in fact, be quite easily refuted.

My apprehension to believe without evidence or reason to is not an act of faith. It is simply me not being selective as what I apply my skepticism to. My unbelief in pixies, for instance, is not a faith based position. I will remain skeptical of their existence until you can successfully persuade me that they do indeed exist. I await evidence.

"you would be more accurate to say that science is your god, seeing that you have chosen to blindly believe what scientist (or school teachers) have said. You have accepted the “findings” of others without applying the discipline to objectively search out the matter for yourself."

Now that's quite presumptuous.

Firstly, I follow logic and reason. I look at what's presented to me and base my understanding on the proof and sensicality of the material that I am presented with. Science is certainly not my "god".

Secondly, I don't need to have a life experience to be reasonable or logical. Logic is not dependent on age, and my age has nothing to do with it.

Thirdly, nobody trusts individual scientists. Scientists are people, and people are all-too commonly subject to bias and error. However, science as a process is a different thing altogether. It is based upon contemporary and critical peer review of each and every scientists findings. Because of the competition involved between these individuals, all trying to scrutinise and disprove another's hypothesis whilst validating their own, the truth emerges.

If someone was able to completely annihilate the theory of evolution with a revolutionary idea that was corroborated by substantial evidence, it would enter the cold and calculating process of peer review. If it survived this overwhelmingly rigourous and wonderfully critical (and also, unending) process, it would then be accepted as a valid hypothesis and researchers would proceed to integrate the old knowledge with the new data. It's a refreshingly self-corrective process.

Due to the exacting nature of the scientific method and the ruthless and uncompromising procedure of peer review, truth is able to seep through the cracks of human error and vested interests.

I trust this method and it proves itself everyday.

Faith has nothing to do with it.


Is trusting a scientist an act of faith?

An interesting comment came up on one of my posts recently. I figured it would be more appropriate to address it as a post as opposed to it getting lost in the comments section given the regularity I hear such a remark.
"Let's be real. You are proud that you "don't believe". However, if you are 17 years old as you say you are, you have not had the time to develop the scientific skills to prove what you claim to believe about evolution (as a source of life, the universe, and everything). Nor have you had the time to objectively examine the possibility of the existence of God or gods. You are exercising the same amount of faith as a devoutly religious person. So instead of saying that you don’t believe in God/gods, you would be more accurate to say that science is your god, seeing that you have chosen to blindly believe what scientist (or school teachers) have said. You have accepted the “findings” of others without applying the discipline to objectively search out the matter for yourself."
I'll deal with the first paragraph for now.

"Nor have you had the time to objectively examine the possibility of the existence of God or gods. You are exercising the same amount of faith as a devoutly religious person."

Objectively examine? I don't see any evidence and I have most certainly looked. If you can supply me with substantiated and incontrovertible evidence, I will most gladly accept the existence of your particular god. As for the semantic arguments for deities, I find none of them in any way compelling and most can and have, in fact, be quite easily refuted.

My apprehension to believe without evidence or reason to is not an act of faith. It is simply me not being selective as what I apply my skepticism to. My unbelief in pixies, for instance, is not a faith based position. I will remain skeptical of their existence until you can successfully persuade me that they do indeed exist. I await evidence.

"you would be more accurate to say that science is your god, seeing that you have chosen to blindly believe what scientist (or school teachers) have said. You have accepted the “findings” of others without applying the discipline to objectively search out the matter for yourself."

Now that's quite presumptuous.

Firstly, I follow logic and reason. I look at what's presented to me and base my understanding on the proof and sensicality of the material that I am presented with. Science is certainly not my "god".

Secondly, I don't need to have a life experience to be reasonable or logical. Logic is not dependent on age, and my age has nothing to do with it.

Thirdly, nobody trusts individual scientists. Scientists are people, and people are all-too commonly subject to bias and error. However, science as a process is a different thing altogether. It is based upon contemporary and critical peer review of each and every scientists findings. Because of the competition involved between these individuals, all trying to scrutinise and disprove another's hypothesis whilst validating their own, the truth emerges.

If someone was able to completely annihilate the theory of evolution with a revolutionary idea that was corroborated by substantial evidence, it would enter the cold and calculating process of peer review. If it survived this overwhelmingly rigourous and wonderfully critical (and also, unending) process, it would then be accepted as a valid hypothesis and researchers would proceed to integrate the old knowledge with the new data. It's a refreshingly self-corrective process.

Due to the exacting nature of the scientific method and the ruthless and uncompromising procedure of peer review, truth is able to seep through the cracks of human error and vested interests.

I trust this method and it proves itself everyday.

Faith has nothing to do with it.


The Problem of Evil and the Free Will predicament

Aside from the blinding lack of evidence within any and every assertion inducing the supernatural, the problem of evil and suffering is one of the most pronounced stumbling block for most religions. Trying to reconcile the flaws of this world with a supposedly benevolent, omnipotent and omniscient being serves to be a profoundly difficult conundrum for theists to satisfactorily resolve.

Of course, Epicurus realised this over 2000 years ago, and expressed it more than sufficiently, too:
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?                                                                                                                                                          
As a quick addendum to the above argument, here's a piece from a wikipedia article concerning the problem of evil:

  1. God exists.
  2. God is omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly good.
  3. A perfectly good being would want to prevent all evils.
  4. An omniscient being knows every way in which evils can come into existence.
  5. An omnipotent being, who knows every way in which an evil can come into existence, has the power to prevent that evil from coming into existence.
  6. A being who knows every way in which an evil can come into existence, who is able to prevent that evil from coming into existence, and who wants to do so, would prevent the existence of that evil.
  7. If there exists an omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly good being, then no evil exists.
  8. Evil exists (logical contradiction).

 The typical theist response usually goes along the lines of free will. For instance, if a god were to remove our capacity for committing evil (or just evil in general) it would thus inhibit our ability to choose to do good, ergo no true free will.

However, I have a number of objections to this.

Firstly, and most importantly, there is no evil in natural suffering, unless of course someone enabled it to happen. If a rockslide crushes a town or a tornado demolishes a living area, there was never any malevolent intention for it to happen. There was no devising or scheming on natures part, there was no underlying motive and there were no decisions made for it to occur. It just happened. Without deliberation. Without purpose.

As you should see, it has nothing to do with free will. It is an entirely unintentional event. It is also entirely preventable and with zero impact on free will. Yet rock slides and other natural disasters occur every day. Why? Does god enjoy watching his lego blocks crumble? Does he not consider it unjust that he is allowing millions to suffer from excruciating agonies and to die mercilessly and unnecessarily because he is, for whatever reason, unwilling to give us a world that doesn't spontaneously erupt every so often? Where is the benevolence in enabling such unnecessary misery?

There is none. If God could prevent such atrocities, and if he doesn't, he is accountable for his inaction which results in the deaths of billions. He is responsible. Designing a world susceptible to such disasters and then inflicting their influence upon his creations by allowing them to happen does not fit well on the resume of an all loving entity.

There are many more questions I could ask. None of which can be thoroughly resolved unless adopting the perspective that there is in fact no god to allow for this to happen in the first place. Well, either that or gods a royal prick.

Secondly, not intervening when someone is suffering from the evil of another individual because you're concerned about their "free will" is not an admirable characteristic. Allowing a child to be abused for the sake of the abusers freedom to do so is NOT acceptable. It is NOT benevolent. It is NOT the right thing to do. I really can't stress that enough.

If I knew of a child that was being physically and sexually abused, would you consider me a good person if my excuse for refusing to take action was: "oh, well I didn't want to take away the free will of the parents, you see. Forcing them to succumb to the law would turn them into robots without any choice of their own. It's better if they choose to do the right thing on their own."? No. Of course you wouldn't. You would cast me, and rightly so, as a despicable person who is just as malignant and pathetic as the parents abusing their child.

Yet, this is not how people view gods position on the issue. People disregard the rights and free will of the actual child being abused in favour of the free will of the abuser by defending this "free will" stance. I sincerely object to this. I find it abhorrent.

Thirdly, is god omniscient and omnipotent? Is it then not reasonable to assume that an all knowing, all powerful individual would be able to create a perfectly harmonised and peaceful world without affecting free will? If not, you'll have to redefine the terms of his omniscience and omnipotence. They seem to be limited.

Lastly, you cannot absolve the creator of responsibility if the creation succumbs to the nature that was originally instilled by the creator. If someone programs a computer to design and propagate viruses and malware, you blame the programmer, not the program. As Lawrence Louis of American Atheists says; "If the creation (i.e human beings) transgresses law established by the creator, it is due to the weakness that was instilled in the creation by the creator. Adam and Eve would not be weak enough to succumb to the temptation of the serpent unless they were created weak."
___

If such a being exists, it is not worthy of praise or rituals. A being who sets up his faulty creations for such horrific suffering and then using this as a basis of judgement is nothing but an over powerful, malicious tyrant. I will not bow to anyone that willingly allows what I see in this world daily to happen. Such a being deserves nothing.


The Problem of Evil and the Free Will predicament

Aside from the blinding lack of evidence within any and every assertion inducing the supernatural, the problem of evil and suffering is one of the most pronounced stumbling block for most religions. Trying to reconcile the flaws of this world with a supposedly benevolent, omnipotent and omniscient being serves to be a profoundly difficult conundrum for theists to satisfactorily resolve.

Of course, Epicurus realised this over 2000 years ago, and expressed it more than sufficiently, too:
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?                                                                                                                                                          
As a quick addendum to the above argument, here's a piece from a wikipedia article concerning the problem of evil:

  1. God exists.
  2. God is omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly good.
  3. A perfectly good being would want to prevent all evils.
  4. An omniscient being knows every way in which evils can come into existence.
  5. An omnipotent being, who knows every way in which an evil can come into existence, has the power to prevent that evil from coming into existence.
  6. A being who knows every way in which an evil can come into existence, who is able to prevent that evil from coming into existence, and who wants to do so, would prevent the existence of that evil.
  7. If there exists an omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly good being, then no evil exists.
  8. Evil exists (logical contradiction).

 The typical theist response usually goes along the lines of free will. For instance, if a god were to remove our capacity for committing evil (or just evil in general) it would thus inhibit our ability to choose to do good, ergo no true free will.

However, I have a number of objections to this.

Firstly, and most importantly, there is no evil in natural suffering, unless of course someone enabled it to happen. If a rockslide crushes a town or a tornado demolishes a living area, there was never any malevolent intention for it to happen. There was no devising or scheming on natures part, there was no underlying motive and there were no decisions made for it to occur. It just happened. Without deliberation. Without purpose.

As you should see, it has nothing to do with free will. It is an entirely unintentional event. It is also entirely preventable and with zero impact on free will. Yet rock slides and other natural disasters occur every day. Why? Does god enjoy watching his lego blocks crumble? Does he not consider it unjust that he is allowing millions to suffer from excruciating agonies and to die mercilessly and unnecessarily because he is, for whatever reason, unwilling to give us a world that doesn't spontaneously erupt every so often? Where is the benevolence in enabling such unnecessary misery?

There is none. If God could prevent such atrocities, and if he doesn't, he is accountable for his inaction which results in the deaths of billions. He is responsible. Designing a world susceptible to such disasters and then inflicting their influence upon his creations by allowing them to happen does not fit well on the resume of an all loving entity.

There are many more questions I could ask. None of which can be thoroughly resolved unless adopting the perspective that there is in fact no god to allow for this to happen in the first place. Well, either that or gods a royal prick.

Secondly, not intervening when someone is suffering from the evil of another individual because you're concerned about their "free will" is not an admirable characteristic. Allowing a child to be abused for the sake of the abusers freedom to do so is NOT acceptable. It is NOT benevolent. It is NOT the right thing to do. I really can't stress that enough.

If I knew of a child that was being physically and sexually abused, would you consider me a good person if my excuse for refusing to take action was: "oh, well I didn't want to take away the free will of the parents, you see. Forcing them to succumb to the law would turn them into robots without any choice of their own. It's better if they choose to do the right thing on their own."? No. Of course you wouldn't. You would cast me, and rightly so, as a despicable person who is just as malignant and pathetic as the parents abusing their child.

Yet, this is not how people view gods position on the issue. People disregard the rights and free will of the actual child being abused in favour of the free will of the abuser by defending this "free will" stance. I sincerely object to this. I find it abhorrent.

Thirdly, is god omniscient and omnipotent? Is it then not reasonable to assume that an all knowing, all powerful individual would be able to create a perfectly harmonised and peaceful world without affecting free will? If not, you'll have to redefine the terms of his omniscience and omnipotence. They seem to be limited.

Lastly, you cannot absolve the creator of responsibility if the creation succumbs to the nature that was originally instilled by the creator. If someone programs a computer to design and propagate viruses and malware, you blame the programmer, not the program. As Lawrence Louis of American Atheists says; "If the creation (i.e human beings) transgresses law established by the creator, it is due to the weakness that was instilled in the creation by the creator. Adam and Eve would not be weak enough to succumb to the temptation of the serpent unless they were created weak."
___

If such a being exists, it is not worthy of praise or rituals. A being who sets up his faulty creations for such horrific suffering and then using this as a basis of judgement is nothing but an over powerful, malicious tyrant. I will not bow to anyone that willingly allows what I see in this world daily to happen. Such a being deserves nothing.


It’s time to stop the pretence

I haven't had time to put together a blog post, so instead, I humbly offer up this essay I wrote last year. If you find it waffly at times, I had a page limit to reach and a designated title to stick to...

Given title: "Let's stop all this pretence! Let's tell each other the unvarnished truth for a change!"

Little white lies are everywhere. They're so darn tempting that we can't help but incessantly fall prey to their irresistible allure. We never tell Mary that her dress is actually hideous for instance, or that it was her that was completely out of line last weekend. No, instead we choose to coat the truth in a thick lathering of misinformation and deliberate omission; crafting a rich broth of blatant and bubbling mis truths. This is done usually out of a desire to prevent offence and to conform to an imposed societal etiquette; but it's also of vital necessity for a general social cohesion.

Humans are communal creatures. Our durability as a species is a result of us living as a collective unit. It is therefore essential to suppress the volatility that would undoubtedly erupt if humans were to express all of our basal and abrasive ponderings to others. So, it's understandable that evolution would endow us with a sufficient sensitivity to cautiously tread around peoples egos and to comfort them through the flimsy guise of falsehood. However, this inherent and ingrained sense of responsibility to console others by means of deliberate misrepresentation seems to have evolved to an extent that we persistently lie to even ourselves. The most dominant being the pretence of religion.

Humanities most valuable asset is the mind: its capacity and enigma is astounding. Our lumps of grey matter, safely encased within our cranium, allow us to experience overwhelming emotion and curiousity, to cultivate novel and vastly complex ideas, to innovate, to advance and to understand. It also deems us worthy to gift us with one of the most powerful and cutting instruments in our mental toolkit: logic. People use and appreciate the effects if this immaterial implement every single day. Its influence stretches from deciding upon the best way to organise the teacups in your dishwasher to sending astronauts to the faraway reaches of the cosmos. It demands reasoning and evidential support, and because of this, it works. It is the basis of civilisation and it allows the world as we know it to be.

Yet, somehow, as soon as religion and mortality are considered, all requirements of logic and standard reasoning go out the window. People immediately discard all semblance of skepticism and rationality when it comes to their own particular brand of fairytale, it seems. Tell someone that an invisible, flying and undetectable squirrel follows you around all day and you'll be met with nothing but ridicule. They'll rightfully demand substantiated proof, and until you comply with sufficient corroboration, they will inevitably continue to laugh and jeer. "What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence", they'll proudly recite, and then by the next breath, blindly profess their legalistic loyalty to the one tiny, and just as unfounded, segment of Christianity that they happen to subscribe to by pure chance of birth. It's a dumbfounding contradiction.

So, then why are these fundamental axioms so readily dismissed once religion becomes involved? Why can't we accept the ugly and unvarnished truth, in exchange for a glimpse at the thrilling rawness of reality? To me, the answer is simple. Religion stems from a very primal and influential fear. When brooding over our own mortal predicament, rationalities answer - that your essence fades alongside your palpable self - becomes disconcertingly unappealing. No one wants to hear of dissolving into nothingness. No one wants a void of unending vacuity. This answer, this blunt reality, however unlovely and unromantic, is all logic has to offer on the subject. So people reject this utterly distasteful notion, and instead, allow their own revulsion over the prospect to fully justify its impossibility without indulging in any of the typical routines of reason. Fueled by our own intrinsic abhorrence over our all too delicate existence, we desperately cling to the soothing and whimsical fantasies religion has to offer.
Simply put, we lie to ourselves in order to glaze and soften a profoundly unpleasant reality.

However appealing and fanciful this sugar-coated notion may be, it's nothing but a child-like pretence, and frankly, the world deserves better. Is it not enough that we, such a select few and despite such astronomical odds, are the ones who get to appreciate the monumental privilege that it is to simply be? How presumptuous must one be to demand or assume eternity, when so many get only nothingness? This thought obviously isn't of concern for some. Yet there's a definite value, as well as a liberating honesty, in settling with this far from fantastical truth. Realising the fleeting and fragile nature of our glimpse at life, is the only way to truly understand its rarity and significance. Its constantly lingering presence may cast an unwelcome shadow at times, but it's a stark and much needed reminder to truly value our brief witness to the cosmos.

Its time to stop the pretence.


It’s time to stop the pretence

I haven't had time to put together a blog post, so instead, I humbly offer up this essay I wrote last year. If you find it waffly at times, I had a page limit to reach and a designated title to stick to...

Given title: "Let's stop all this pretence! Let's tell each other the unvarnished truth for a change!"

Little white lies are everywhere. They're so darn tempting that we can't help but incessantly fall prey to their irresistible allure. We never tell Mary that her dress is actually hideous for instance, or that it was her that was completely out of line last weekend. No, instead we choose to coat the truth in a thick lathering of misinformation and deliberate omission; crafting a rich broth of blatant and bubbling mis truths. This is done usually out of a desire to prevent offence and to conform to an imposed societal etiquette; but it's also of vital necessity for a general social cohesion.

Humans are communal creatures. Our durability as a species is a result of us living as a collective unit. It is therefore essential to suppress the volatility that would undoubtedly erupt if humans were to express all of our basal and abrasive ponderings to others. So, it's understandable that evolution would endow us with a sufficient sensitivity to cautiously tread around peoples egos and to comfort them through the flimsy guise of falsehood. However, this inherent and ingrained sense of responsibility to console others by means of deliberate misrepresentation seems to have evolved to an extent that we persistently lie to even ourselves. The most dominant being the pretence of religion.

Humanities most valuable asset is the mind: its capacity and enigma is astounding. Our lumps of grey matter, safely encased within our cranium, allow us to experience overwhelming emotion and curiousity, to cultivate novel and vastly complex ideas, to innovate, to advance and to understand. It also deems us worthy to gift us with one of the most powerful and cutting instruments in our mental toolkit: logic. People use and appreciate the effects if this immaterial implement every single day. Its influence stretches from deciding upon the best way to organise the teacups in your dishwasher to sending astronauts to the faraway reaches of the cosmos. It demands reasoning and evidential support, and because of this, it works. It is the basis of civilisation and it allows the world as we know it to be.

Yet, somehow, as soon as religion and mortality are considered, all requirements of logic and standard reasoning go out the window. People immediately discard all semblance of skepticism and rationality when it comes to their own particular brand of fairytale, it seems. Tell someone that an invisible, flying and undetectable squirrel follows you around all day and you'll be met with nothing but ridicule. They'll rightfully demand substantiated proof, and until you comply with sufficient corroboration, they will inevitably continue to laugh and jeer. "What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence", they'll proudly recite, and then by the next breath, blindly profess their legalistic loyalty to the one tiny, and just as unfounded, segment of Christianity that they happen to subscribe to by pure chance of birth. It's a dumbfounding contradiction.

So, then why are these fundamental axioms so readily dismissed once religion becomes involved? Why can't we accept the ugly and unvarnished truth, in exchange for a glimpse at the thrilling rawness of reality? To me, the answer is simple. Religion stems from a very primal and influential fear. When brooding over our own mortal predicament, rationalities answer - that your essence fades alongside your palpable self - becomes disconcertingly unappealing. No one wants to hear of dissolving into nothingness. No one wants a void of unending vacuity. This answer, this blunt reality, however unlovely and unromantic, is all logic has to offer on the subject. So people reject this utterly distasteful notion, and instead, allow their own revulsion over the prospect to fully justify its impossibility without indulging in any of the typical routines of reason. Fueled by our own intrinsic abhorrence over our all too delicate existence, we desperately cling to the soothing and whimsical fantasies religion has to offer.
Simply put, we lie to ourselves in order to glaze and soften a profoundly unpleasant reality.

However appealing and fanciful this sugar-coated notion may be, it's nothing but a child-like pretence, and frankly, the world deserves better. Is it not enough that we, such a select few and despite such astronomical odds, are the ones who get to appreciate the monumental privilege that it is to simply be? How presumptuous must one be to demand or assume eternity, when so many get only nothingness? This thought obviously isn't of concern for some. Yet there's a definite value, as well as a liberating honesty, in settling with this far from fantastical truth. Realising the fleeting and fragile nature of our glimpse at life, is the only way to truly understand its rarity and significance. Its constantly lingering presence may cast an unwelcome shadow at times, but it's a stark and much needed reminder to truly value our brief witness to the cosmos.

Its time to stop the pretence.


Thanking God… a dark satire.

So I decided to joyously compile a list of well deserved thanks to this oh-so wonderful and all-embracing Man in the Sky. It's important to acknowledge where credit is due, you see.

Thanks for creating me an atheist with evidential standards for belief, not complying to them and then expecting me not to be one. My existence has revolted your followers for thousands of years and they have of course acted in accordance with this divinely endorsed revulsion. It sure hurt a lot, but thanks for the recognition!

Thanks for all the stories of death and torture and bigotry as supplied by your lovely book. All of those threats of a fiery Hell, genocidal purges, misogyny and homophobia provided me with some excellent light reading. Pity you didn't know that your followers would take your divine words to heart. Or did you, with all that omniscience and stuffs? Oh well, thanks anyway!

Thanks for all those misogynistic laws, too, like ordering women to keep silent, understand our unworthiness and to just be generally submissive so that we can be abused without kicking up a fuss. Without all that heavenly designated sexism, us women might have actually thought that we were equal to our male superiors. What a horrifying thought.

I heard that over 99.8% of all species that have ever existed have gone extinct. I get bored easily, so thanks for maintaining such a nice variety, even if it is through ruthless and entirely unnecessary destruction and death. I never liked those dinosaurs, anyway. We're way prettier!

Regarding all those terrible tornadoes and earthquakes and tsunamis and volcanoes and asteroids and blizzards and avalanches and famines and droughts and landslides and all those other terrifying natural disasters, well... by your standards, they all seem pretty preventable to me... seems like an awful waste of life... but what do I know? My distaste for human suffering is obviously just ignorant. And I do admire how you express your love so mysteriously and with such a relentless creativity! I am humbled - thanks!

Thanks for encouraging blind and unquestioned faith in replace of human reason. It's so much easier just to let you do the thinking for us. We don't need silly things like space ships or human rights or cancer cures, anyway! We have you and your commandments!

Sometimes I don't always understand why you permit, much less create, diseases and the like, mainly due to all the unnecessary misery and despair. But then I remember, you're just testing us all! Thanks for the thought!

Sometimes, I also don't understand why you neglect 3/4 of the population. But then I realise that I couldn't fully appreciate my own situation without a suitable contrast. Seeing all the needless death and destruction happening elsewhere is obviously your plan to make me realise how lucky I am. I feel kind of bad for the others, but thanks for keeping me safe... instead of millions of others... I guess?


And lastly, before I go, thanks for putting such nice little stories about creation in your book, by the way. Genesis is just so much easier to grasp than stupid things like evolution. Those dumb scientists need to realise that there's more to life than "evidence", jeez. We have your book, after all!


Thanks!

For all the crazies out there, this is a satire. And no, I'm not trying to be rude. Next time you thank your God, think of all the people that aren't thanking him and their reasons as to why they are not. Selective intervention does NOT equate to omni benevolence. Thanking God for the success of your trivial pursuits whilst ignoring all of the horrors others are forced to endure, is just insulting. If you're going to "thank him", don't forget those that can't. 


Thanking God… a dark satire.

So I decided to joyously compile a list of well deserved thanks to this oh-so wonderful and all-embracing Man in the Sky. It's important to acknowledge where credit is due, you see.

Thanks for creating me an atheist with evidential standards for belief, not complying to them and then expecting me not to be one. My existence has revolted your followers for thousands of years and they have of course acted in accordance with this divinely endorsed revulsion. It sure hurt a lot, but thanks for the recognition!

Thanks for all the stories of death and torture and bigotry as supplied by your lovely book. All of those threats of a fiery Hell, genocidal purges, misogyny and homophobia provided me with some excellent light reading. Pity you didn't know that your followers would take your divine words to heart. Or did you, with all that omniscience and stuffs? Oh well, thanks anyway!

Thanks for all those misogynistic laws, too, like ordering women to keep silent, understand our unworthiness and to just be generally submissive so that we can be abused without kicking up a fuss. Without all that heavenly designated sexism, us women might have actually thought that we were equal to our male superiors. What a horrifying thought.

I heard that over 99.8% of all species that have ever existed have gone extinct. I get bored easily, so thanks for maintaining such a nice variety, even if it is through ruthless and entirely unnecessary destruction and death. I never liked those dinosaurs, anyway. We're way prettier!

Regarding all those terrible tornadoes and earthquakes and tsunamis and volcanoes and asteroids and blizzards and avalanches and famines and droughts and landslides and all those other terrifying natural disasters, well... by your standards, they all seem pretty preventable to me... seems like an awful waste of life... but what do I know? My distaste for human suffering is obviously just ignorant. And I do admire how you express your love so mysteriously and with such a relentless creativity! I am humbled - thanks!

Thanks for encouraging blind and unquestioned faith in replace of human reason. It's so much easier just to let you do the thinking for us. We don't need silly things like space ships or human rights or cancer cures, anyway! We have you and your commandments!

Sometimes I don't always understand why you permit, much less create, diseases and the like, mainly due to all the unnecessary misery and despair. But then I remember, you're just testing us all! Thanks for the thought!

Sometimes, I also don't understand why you neglect 3/4 of the population. But then I realise that I couldn't fully appreciate my own situation without a suitable contrast. Seeing all the needless death and destruction happening elsewhere is obviously your plan to make me realise how lucky I am. I feel kind of bad for the others, but thanks for keeping me safe... instead of millions of others... I guess?


And lastly, before I go, thanks for putting such nice little stories about creation in your book, by the way. Genesis is just so much easier to grasp than stupid things like evolution. Those dumb scientists need to realise that there's more to life than "evidence", jeez. We have your book, after all!


Thanks!

For all the crazies out there, this is a satire. And no, I'm not trying to be rude. Next time you thank your God, think of all the people that aren't thanking him and their reasons as to why they are not. Selective intervention does NOT equate to omni benevolence. Thanking God for the success of your trivial pursuits whilst ignoring all of the horrors others are forced to endure, is just insulting. If you're going to "thank him", don't forget those that can't.