Author Archive for RB

Facebook rewards radical Islamists

Facebook has rewarded Islamofascists by taking down the roughly 100,000 person “Draw Muhammad Day” group. It absolutely goes without saying that this is 100% UNACCEPTABLE. Despicable. This is rewarding bullies. It is telling them that they can successfully use threats and incessant bitching to get Western organizations to throw the rights of the people under the bus.

I for one will be participating in protest efforts. I can only assume that the Net is already abuzz with plans and actions as we speak. I hope you will, too.

I am doubtful that I will pull myself off of Facebook as I simply use it to much and it serves useful and enjoyable functions for me. But that does not mean that nothing will be done. And perhaps I’ll eventually get to the point where I do pull the plug on my account.

But for now, it’s time to protest this inexcusable capitulation to these unacceptable demands.


May 20, 2010: Draw Muhammad Day

This is my first post in forever – and probably my last post in a similar time frame. But I wanted to take part in Draw Muhammad Day, a worthy international effort spawned online in order to stand up to Islamofascists who use threats of violence to control the behaviour of others.

I created it myself. Following the lead of others I’ve seen online, I’ve deliberately made it benign (i.e., no negative imagery). The stick figure is for simplicity, not to demean. This said, I reserve every right to post any horribly vile image of Muhammad that I wish. It’s not something I have any intention of doing, but I have every civil right to. The purpose of going the benign route is to highlight the ridiculousness of the inhumanly vile over-reaction of said Islamofascists.

As Cenk Uygur of The Young Turks has pointed out, perhaps these people’s problem is that they don’t really believe in Allah. If they did, then why do they need to take it upon themselves to harm those non-Muslims who break Allah’s rules for Muslims? What? They don’t think that Allah has got the situation under control? That he can’t handle a few cartoonists?


Tom Green rages at idiots on Fox News’ Red Eye

The video of the dopes on Faux Noise’s 3 AM program Red Eye ripping on Canada and Canadian troops in Afghanistan as certainly made its rounds on the net as of late. Here it is incase you haven’t seen it.

It has annoyed and angered quite a few people, to say the least. I would describe my reaction as mildly annoyed. I just don’t view these people as credible, and so their idiotic views hardly phased me. A few months ago, I would’ve been more annoyed. But now it’s becoming increasingly clear that the target market of this network – right wing lunatics and ignoramuses – are moving further and further into marginalization.

Tom Green, on the other hand, was absolutely enraged. I pass the video on because it’s important to support those in the public eye who speak out against this horrible network. While it’s true that corruption in news media spreads across the television dial, Fox News is in a league of its own. The bar was already so low, so the people at Fox News routinely take to digging.


Today (FRIDAY) Is Atheist Pride Day

Today is Atheist Pride Day on Facebook*! Participate by changing your Facebook profile picture this scarlet “A” (a symbol for the Atheist Out Campaign):

And change your Facebook status to something like “I’m an atheist.”

More info here.

Happy atheisting!

* Note: This event was created and is being promoted by individual Facebook users and is not an official promotion of Facebook itself.


The Young Turks: A Growing Voice For Reason

The Young Turks (TYT) is a burgeoning American independent news and views organization. With their daily, even-handed, candid, insightful and humourous coverage of various issues across the political spectrum, TYT’s YouTube channel has amassed a massive following. They are a demonstration of the sort of standard that major news media does not live up to. They ask the hard questions. They call spades spades.

Their success has not gone unnoticed. Host Cenk Uygur has been an invited guest on a number of major news broadcasts (e.g., CNN), contributes to the Huffington Post, and has received a flurry of endorsements and support in his self-declared candidacy for a spot on CNBC primetime.

Of particular interest to the freethought community is Uygur’s advocacy for reason and secularism. He will flat out say on news media that the religious right is out of its collective mind. He has stated flat out that our religions are not reasonable belief systems. And most recently, he reported on the size of the nonreligious segment of American society (15% according to the just-released study out of Trinity College in in Hartford, Conneticut), and how the nonreligious are the third largest and the fastest growing religious/nonreligious group in the country. He also acknowledged the nonreligious minority’s history of being marginalized, distrusted and denigrated and the imperative that this block of society mobilize. After stating his membership in this community, he reached out to his co-non-religionists and declared

“Lets stand up and be heard. ‘Cause they’ve run over us for too long. We’re the logical ones. So lets be heard.”

On the other side of the page, he exclaimed that those members of the religious right who are so far gone as to be wishing for the end of the world are the ones that we need to be marginalizing.

Here is the video:

I encourage everyone to check out TYT’s YouTube channel.


Fear and Anti-Male Discrimination in the Classroom

In his book The Culture of Fear: Why Americans Are Afraid of the Wrong Things, Barry Glassner discusses how Americans have become unnecessarily fearful of many things, thanks in good part to opportunistic politicians, single-minded advocacy groups, sensationalist news media, “news magazine” programming and so on. Such irrational fear complexes can do profound and unjustified harm not just to the directly affected individuals and groups, but to society as a whole.

When a segment of society has been unjustifiable tarred, it often takes dedicated activism to raise people’s consciousness to the injustice and perniciousness of such discrimination. My consciousness was recently raised by blogger Justin Trottier with regard to a branch of discrimination that does not seem to receive much public acknowledgement: discrimination against men.

Discrimination against men. It happens. Like in education, where simply being male apparently constitutes Strike 1 with regard to pedophilia. The fear of male teachers engaging in sexual contact with young students has become a major source of anxiety in education systems around the world. Below is the story of my brush with this phobia.

I’m a 26 year old male from Canada teaching English to children in Seoul, South Korea. Less than two weeks ago I had been teaching for my second last day at a school I had been at for 9.5 months. Everyday during my time at this school, I spent 1.5 hours with a class of four/five year olds. I really like kids, and I try my best to be sensitive and responsive to their concerns. I want them to feel comfortable, loved, accepted, taken care of, and so on.

I’ve always been affectionate with my students. However, for the first few months, the affection was displayed via high-fives, pats on the back and small hugs which were more often than not initiated by the students. I myself was resistent to becoming too affectionate with them because of concerns of it “looking suspicious”. Sometimes one of my 4 year old girl students would want to give me a kiss on the cheek and I would not allow it.

But as time went on and my students and I bonded, I started giving each of them hugs regularly, would let them give me a kiss on the cheek if they wanted and would sometimes give them a kiss on the cheek. I tempered my affection for kids based on such things as how long they’ve been at the school, whether or not they’ve initiated a hug with me in the past, their current state (e.g., are they crying?), and so on. I also take into account such considerations as not wanting some kids to feel like I like other kids more than them, so one way or another, I try to make sure each student – new or not, affectionate or not – knows that I care about them. And I always offer to give hugs to scared and tearful new students who are leaving their home for the first time; but it’s their choice whether or not they walk into it.

So, the incident. On my second last day at the school, a fellow male teacher – slightly older than I and who had been at the school a few months longer – said to me in private, very earnestly, that he had seen me kiss one of my students. I responded by saying “Yeah.. On the cheek…”. He responded saying that it was very inappropriate. I dead-panned “they’re five”. I could have also added that this was the last time I would ever see them (they didn’t have class on my last day), but I did not as this was not the first time I had ever kissed one of the four/five year olds on the cheek. He responded that it’s very inappropriate. They’re not your kids.

It’s really hard to receive this sort of communication and not feel personally insulted and not-so-implicitly accused of being some sort of weirdo or deviant. In all honesty, my day was ruined. Being connected with pedophilia can have that effect.

It appears that there is a broad distrust of male teachers. Yes, some male teachers have sexually assaulted students. But look what our fear of this presumably statistically infrequent event is doing. Just about any professional who deals with children or education will tell you, I imagine, that many children are affectionate, that many adults are inclined to be affectionate back, and that the relationship between teacher and pupil is a very important part of education. And now, because of a small collection of undesirable conduct, we are handcuffing all teachers – though with far greater suspicion directed at males – and undermining relationships, freedom to consensually express affection, and education. I have friends in teachers’ college in Ontario who have told me about how they’ve been specifically taught how to successfully avert a student-initiated hug by tactfully turning it into a socially-awkward handshake.

I’m not denying the reality of the need to protect children from sexual advances from teachers. But what a crude way of going about it. This is a case of fear about one of the things that could go wrong greatly interfering with educators’ ability to see that things go right. And, really, it’s just plain disturbing in my opinion. Does anyone else not find it disturbingly dehumanizing that we are constructing a culture in which teachers and students aren’t allowed to develop and enact warm and supportive relationships with one another? And that we’re teaching distrust and social distance? This is not a reasonable, helpful or proportional response. Wouldn’t it be better to simply make students, teachers and everyone aware of the simple reality of the situation – that sexual abuse does sometimes happen – and to teach students what sexual abuse is, what their rights are, how to go about addressing concerning situations, and simply creating a culture where actually inappropriate appropriate behaviour – e.g., sexual advances and unwanted nonsexual acts of affection (e.g., hugs) – can safely be reported?

Pedophilia in the classroom is a legitimate cause for concern. But so is preserving the humanity of the student-teacher relationship. And so is not sexually profiling male teachers.


Bring your gun to Church, because God’s not gonna save you

Ye of little faith…

The Arkansas House approved a bill allowing concealed handguns in churches. The bill, which passed on a 57-to-42 vote and now heads to the Senate, removes churches and other houses of worship from the list of places where concealed handguns are banned. Currently, the only private entities where concealed weapons are banned are churches and bars. The bill’s sponsor, Representative Beverly Pyle, Republican of Cedarville, said she introduced the measure after a series of church shootings across the country. (New York Times)

In addition to bringing to mind Epicurus’ paradox of an omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent God*, this event also demonstrates how little confidence some devoutly religious people in their God when it counts. If you can’t trust your God to protect you from being shot in a Church, what can you trust him for? Or, is being shot in the head while reading hymns just another one of those tests of faith – along with cancer, homosexual urges and other horrible diseases and deformities?

Ah, but God gave us – all of us – freewill. How sweet of him to not stand between the freewill of the gunman and the faithful and unsuspecting churchgoer.

And lets talk about freewill a little bit. Lets just assume, for the sake of argument, that there is an immaterial soul that is somehow separate from our genes, neurology and socialization. Above them such that we have some special agentive core that is capable of overriding our impulses, bad social programming and so on. What is the nature of this soul? What are its inclinations? What are its preferences and aversions? It must have some type of programmed direction, because how would it do anything if not? What determines how the soul decides the soul it wants to be? On what basis does it choose its direction of formation? What is a free soul to do with no direction or drive? And how easily swayed it would be by genes and socialization.

If God did indeed give it direction and drive, then where is the freewill? What? We’re free to do us our metaphysical as well as our biological and cultural drives direct us? Technically speaking, I’d be happy to call this freewill as, at the end of the day, we are acting in our own interests (the self being the result of the ongoing interactions that create and shape us). But those interests are not subject to any sort of truly autonomous control. Every bit of cognitive and behavioural framework has been shaped by extraneous sources. There can be nothing that can be pointed to and said “that is your responsibility completely; not only did you do it, and not only did you want to do it, but you chose to want to do it, and you chose to have the cognitive/emotional/environmental framework that would lead you to chose to do it, and you chose that, too…”.

Anyhow, it’s clear that people frequently don’t act as if they don’t trust their God and as if this really is a godless universe. They may make excuses for this – saying that God doesn’t help people who don’t help themselves, that God is indeed helping us by making secular technologies available,  by pointing to the issue of freewill – their own and that of others, and so on. Or they may just casually rite the conundrum off. In any case, it’s a good thing for these people and for many of us that these people are not relying on a magic invisible hand to make sure that everything is okay.

And then there are those who insist on keeping it real, even when keeping it real goes wrong. The prayer healers, for example.

While the latter of these communities is clearly the one generally doing more harm to themselves and others, neither are making any sense and maybe we’d all be better off if more of us could be more honest about what we know and what we don’t know and in our moral, social and political decision making.

* Epicurus on God:

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
     Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
     Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
     Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
     Then why call him God?

Hat Tip: Unreasonable Faith


Protected: Advocacy Blogging 2.0: Increasing Impact By Collaboration

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:



Reason/Humanism Collaborative MegaSite

Greetings Advocates of Reason and Humanism,

Are you interested in joining an ambitious international community of advocates for reason and humanism who are working to create a major independent media voice?

I and a growing group of freethinkers are working to expand our small collaborative website, www.theedger.org (name to change), into a broadbased collaborative site. The primary – though not exclusive – focuses of the site thus far have been secularism, religion and atheism. We are expanding the site’s purview to advocate for reason and humanism more broadly – all areas of public life. Since the site’s launch in June, it has gained the endorsements of both the world’s largest freethought, science and reason advocacy organization (The Center For Inquiry) and the world’s most visited science/atheism blog, Pharyngula, in addition to throngs of other rationalist blogs.

The expanding site will include up-to-date news, quality thought pieces, and original multimedia (e.g., vlogging, citizen journalism, digital arts, etc.). Plans for the coming months include mass email campaigns seeking collaboration and promotion from hundreds of bloggers, university faculty, student organizations and advocacy organizations. We aspire to grow in the direction of online success stories like Daily Kos, who through broadbased collaboration, have built a leading news and views site that facilitates net and community-based advocacy and seamlessly collaborates with traditional advocacy organizations.

The Internet enables unprecedented levels of democratic engagement. Never before have so many been able to create broadly accessible media and organize with people near and far. At present, there are thousands of people advocating for reason and humanistic causes on personal blogs, YouTube accounts and so on. This is good, but we can achieve FAR more working together than we can in isolation. In fact, to a large degree, solo advocacy bloggers are wasting their time, efforts and skills. Solo blogging is simply inefficient.

So, what’s the focus of your advocacy for reason and humanism? Media reform? Drug laws? Gay rights? International trade? Science education? Sexual education? Protecting the environment? Healthcare? Meditation in schools? Third world assistance?

Lets make a difference. Together.

The expansion infrastructure is being built now, with official release of the revamped site coming in February or March.

If interested in joining our team, leave a comment or email me: theframeproblem at live dot ca.


Why ya going to the airport….Flyyyying somewhere?

“How’d ya guess?”

“Well, first I saw your luggage and then when I saw the plane tickets I kind of put two and two together.”


If the shoe fits…throw it at the President!

Something you don’t see enough everyday: Journalists hurling their shoes at corrupt leaders. In this video, an Iraqi journalist demonstrates an alternative interpretation of hard-hitting journalism by firing his shoes at President Bush.


Stephen Colbert: The worst offender against Christianity is God

This is a must-watch Colbert clip. In it, Colbert addresses the Freedom From Religion Foundation’s anti-religion and pro-reason sign at the Washington state Capitol in Olympia, the resolution requiring the Kentucky state Department of Homeland Security’s to display a plaque claiming that “the safety and security of the commonwealth cannot be achieved apart from reliance upon Almight God” (I guess God was out taking wiz one early-mid September morning in 2001), rampant consumerism, among other things. One of those other things was how, in Colbert’s opinion, the worst offender against Christian faith – the one who fuels the atheist agenda and fundamentally undermines belief in God – is God.