Author Archive for KC

Wizard sacked by Muggles

Jim Piculas of Florida has been fired as a substitute teacher for practicing wizardry for a toothpick disappear, then reappear.

Substitute teacher Jim Piculas does a 30-second magic trick where a toothpick disappears then reappears.

But after performing it in front of a classroom at Rushe Middle School in Land ‘O Lakes, Piculas said his job did a disappearing act of its own.

“I get a call the middle of the day from the supervisor of substitute teachers. He says, ‘Jim, we have a huge issue. You can’t take any more assignments. You need to come in right away,’” he said.

When Piculas went in, he learned his little magic trick cast a spell that went much farther than he’d hoped.

“I said, ‘Well Pat, can you explain this to me?’ ‘You’ve been accused of wizardry,’ [he said]. Wizardry?” he asked.

Tampa Bay’s 10 talked to the assistant superintendent with the Pasco County School District who said it wasn’t just the wizardry and that Picular had other performance issues, including “not following lesson plans” and allowing students to play on unapproved computers.

Florida’s been a source of amusement for quite some time now as it seems to always be doing something that’s a bit on the nutty side of things, but this does take the cake doesn’t it?

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F05%2F07%2Fwizard-sacked-by-muggles%2F'; addthis_title = 'Wizard+sacked+by+Muggles'; addthis_pub = '';

Note to Linguistic Fascists

english

If you’re going to demand that people speak English, you should make it a priority to learn how to spell English.

via: Immigration Chronicles: Perhaps spell check is in order …

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F05%2F05%2Fnote-to-linguistic-fascists%2F'; addthis_title = 'Note+to+Linguistic+Fascists'; addthis_pub = '';

God made Spring

Just ask my five year old. Where’d she hear that gem? At school and it’s the truth because her teacher said so.

We should have known that something like this was bound to happen sooner or later. The teacher has made it extremely obvious she’s one of those Christians who assumes everyone else is also.

For example, we recently watched in shock as she led the students in two god soaked pledges and a god soaked song which she followed up by telling the children to bow their heads and say their prayers.

I’ve been hoping that we wouldn’t have to deal with this until our daughter was older and more capable of understanding what’s going on, but it appears that’s not going to be possible.

What’s gets me though is that I feel like the bad guy for even considering making a complaint about this.

I’m also quite worried about what will happen to our daughter if we do. A lot of Christians simply can’t handle not being allowed to use their official positions to promote their personal beliefs. They tend to turn into vicious bullies who make life hell for the only party can reasonably get to - the kid(s).

Our daughter is just coming out her shell and I’m afraid that if there is a backlash, she’ll retreat back into it - permanently.

What’s a parent to do?

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F05%2F04%2Fgod-made-spring%2F'; addthis_title = 'God+made+Spring'; addthis_pub = '';

In case you thought women were human

The state of Oklahoma would like to inform you that you are wrong.

Under the guise of obtaining informed patient consent, this new law requires doctors to withhold pregnancy termination until an ultrasound is performed. The law states that either an abdominal or vaginal ultrasound, whichever gives the best image of the fetus, must be done. Neither the patient nor the doctor can decide which type of ultrasound to use, and the patient cannot opt out of the ultrasound and still have the procedure. In effect, then, the legislature has mandated that a woman have an instrument placed in her vagina for no medical benefit. The law makes no exception for victims of rape and incest.

Can it be any clearer that abortion access is not about the precious babies, but about undermining the rights of women? What else do these jackasses have to do before people wake the fuck up?

Honestly, I swear sometimes we women should start rioting in the streets. What’s there to lose?

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F28%2Fin-case-you-thought-women-were-human%2F'; addthis_title = 'In+case+you+thought+women+were+human'; addthis_pub = '';

Who’s the president of Germany?

If you guessed anyone besides Vladimir Putin, you’re better qualified to be president than John McCain (via “m” in the comments“):

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F25%2Fwhos-the-president-of-germany%2F'; addthis_title = 'Who%26%238217%3Bs+the+president+of+Germany%3F'; addthis_pub = '';

Keith Olbermann - worst person in the world

Last night Keith Olbermann and Howard Fineman decided to get together for a chit chat about Hillary Clinton. As you may know she hasn’t dropped out of the race and certain people are none to happy about it. In fact the recent tone of things can be best summed up as “how do we get the bitch to stop”.

So, after Olbmermann reads parts of a whiny, anti-democratic editorial from the NYT, Fineman started talking about how the adults were going to have to step in and “stop this thing”. In response to this Keith Olbermann casually suggested that this alleged adult would be “somebody who can take her into a room and only he comes out.”

Watch it for yourself:

This is some seriously fucked up shit.

If you fail to see the problem, consider for a moment what your response would be if these two white men were discussing how somebody needed to stop Barack Obama who is read as being a black man here in America. Suppose they suggested that that somebody would be “somebody who can take him out back and come back alone”.

The message would be clear, right? Everyone would realize that they were not only physically threatening Barack Obama, but by extension all black men. Know why? Because that’s how white men speak to one another when they decide that a black man isn’t following the rules they think he needs to be following.

And no, they are not talking about merely speaking to the man in question and convincing him to see things their way. They are talking about physically assaulting that man to such a degree that he won’t be walking away from the “discussion”. That’s why that “somebody” always comes back alone.

And for women - we get taken into a room where the man tasked with policing us reminds us - with his fists - about our proper place in the world. And when he’s done “discussing” things with us, he walks back out alone.

Both of these phrases are about white men asserting with violence their self-declared right to dominate everything and one.  They do not “discuss” anything.  They beat, maim and kill.  And since that “somebody” is always faceless,  we women of all colours and men of colour learn to fear saying/doing something that may cause “somebody” to take us out back or into a room for a “discussion”.

So I think it’s quite clear that Olbermann needs to declare himself to be “the worst person in the world” as he quite literally threatened every woman in America with physical violence.

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F24%2Fkeith-olbermann-worst-person-in-the-world%2F'; addthis_title = 'Keith+Olbermann+-+worst+person+in+the+world'; addthis_pub = '';

Houston wins! Pollutes more air than LA!

List of CO2 Winners

Since moving to Houston from El Paso about six or seven years ago I swear a month hasn’t went by without me spending a few days with some moderate to severe congestion.  It’s so bad that I like to say I’m allergic to Houston.

So it’s with great displeasure that I announce that Houston, Texas has taken first place for releasing 18.625 million tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere barely beating out Los Angeles (another place I’m allergic to) which took 2nd place with 18.595 million tons.

As you may be aware both of these cities are obsessed with pubic “morality” in that they’ve declared war on smokers and other domestic sources of air pollutants (aka: things that we can pretend are worse than the actually worse things the government is involved in).

Both earned their medals by allowing their moneymakers to run wild with Los Angeles paving the entire area and Houston saying “what industrial pollution?!?” while really cranking up the “leave no ground unpaved” industry.

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F17%2Fhouston-wins-pollutes-more-air-than-la%2F'; addthis_title = 'Houston+wins%21+Pollutes+more+air+than+LA%21'; addthis_pub = '';

We the people are pissed off

Apparently there was a “debate” last night on ABC involving Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. I wasn’t aware of it myself and had I been I would’ve probably still went out and had a few beers. Judging from the response this morning, I missed what was the most asinine thing the mass media has done in quite some time.

There are nearly 14,000 responses on ABC’s site and here’s a sample of what the people who may wish they’d went out and had a beer or two instead have to say:

This so-called debate was ABSURD! Why do talking politico newspeople think the show is about THEM! This goes for everyone from Tweety, Russert and now obviously to Glib-son and Staphocoluous. I don’t give a hoot who wears a pin that’s made in China but shaped like a Flag, or what Reverend W. said or didn’t say, and who the hell is Ayers anyway? Bosnia - J.C. boyz, move on. Talk about GASOLINE, COST OF FOOD that I can’t afford any longer, or CRIME or our CRUMBLING BRIDGES. Stop with the gotcha moments. That doesn’t fill up my tank or pay my bills, you IDIOTS.This was just as Tom Shales said - shoddy and despicable performances - put on by ABC. I didn’t get a damn thing out of it.

Stephapoulus was a disgrace. He should resign. Edward R Murrow must be rolling over in his grave. The National Enquirer would not hire him. 45 minutes of nonsense when we are near a depression with the worst military blunder in US history. Gibson should apologize for his role.

Was Charles Gibson wearing a flag pin during the “debate”?Was George Stephanopoluos wearing a flag pin during the “debate”?Was Hillary Clinton wearing a flag pin during the “debate”?No, no and no.Why then, was it an issue as to whether Barak Obama wearing one?Since when did ABC become a subsidiary of FOX?

I take this “debate” charade as an insult to my intelligence and a terrible disservice to the American viewing audience that is trying to understand the positions of candidates on the real issues. I know that I can turn it off if it is offensive, but this is too damn important to be left to the major networks any more. ABC abdicated its responsibilitie. Time to return to the League of Women Voters doing the moderating with exclusive broadcast rights to PBS. This needs to happen for the general elections, in what is likely the most important presidential election of our generation.

I think it’s fair to say that the people are pissed off, eh? If you missed it also take a look at this video for the allegedly “important” questions put to both of them during the first hour of the ‘debate’:

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F17%2Fwe-the-people-are-pissed-off%2F'; addthis_title = 'We+the+people+are+pissed+off'; addthis_pub = '';

That didn’t take long did it?

Yesterday I wrote about various Christian groups that don’t seem to understand that anti-discrimination laws protect them not just from non-Christians, but from each other due in part to their constant battles over who’s a True Christian and the like.

Today I find a post over at A Whore in the Temple of Reason about an editorial in her home state that starts with this line:

They can’t be real Christians. They must be part of an atheist cabal.

Though this “they” is the Westboro Baptist Church which is virulently anti-gay, this is how a lot of individual Christians and sects act. No one but them and their own are the real deal. Everything else is either fake or a plot by the most hated group around which in this case happens to be atheists.

And this is exactly why all Christians should be thankful for anti-discrimination laws. Christians seem to hate each other more than any other group as their favorite sport is seriously attacking each other.

As someone who grew up in fundamentalism, let me put it this way. I was taught that there is more than one hell. I’ve forgotten how many, but I do remember that one of the worst of the hells is specially reserved for fake Christians. The Christian god is supposed to hate them with such a passion that he set up a special hell just for them.

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F16%2Fthat-didnt-take-long-did-it%2F'; addthis_title = 'That+didn%26%238217%3Bt+take+long+did+it%3F'; addthis_pub = '';

Imagine being told “no” because you’re a Christian

Anti-Christian bigotry

A photographer was recently found guilty of discrimination in New Mexico for refusing to photograph the wedding of a lesbian couple because of the “message” it sent. It should come as no surprise that the photographer in question is a Christian who thinks homosexuality is a “sin”.

The professional Christian Martyr set is a bit upset about this smack in the face to their first amendment right to practice their religion in public. And it never ceases to amaze me how dumb these groups and individual supporters are. It’s like they’ve been blinded by their hate of the “other” to such a degree that they don’t realize that what they’re bitching about protects them also.

What’s more, it protects them from each other because if there’s one thing Christians really excel at it’s treating each other like crap. Just think about all the times you’ve heard of one Christian saying another Christian wasn’t one of the very elusive, perhaps extinct, “Real Christians” or the constant bickering between the entire lot about what constitutes that little thing they like to call “Real Religion”.

Hell, if everyone could “practice their religion” without any restriction at all - we “others” would probably end up sitting on the sidelines making bets on which group of Christians has the best chance of kicking the asses of the other Christian groups.

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F15%2Fimagine-being-told-no-because-youre-a-christian%2F'; addthis_title = 'Imagine+being+told+%26quot%3Bno%26quot%3B+because+you%26%238217%3Bre+a+Christian'; addthis_pub = '';

Obama: abortion is never a good thing

Barack Obama is getting on my nerves. First he gave that asinine interview in The Advocate where he pretty much told the gay community that explicitly fighting for equal rights via marriage was a bad political move that could upset the bigots on this side of the sexual identity fence. Now he’s went and decided that those of us who have the weird idea that women are entitled to make their own reproductive decisions have made a “mistake”.

“It may be that those who have opposed abortion get a sense that I’m listening to them and respect their position even though where we finally come down may be different,” he told reporters at a news conference.

The mistake that pro-choice forces have sometimes made in the past, and this is a generalization so it has not always been the case, has been to not acknowledge the wrenching moral issues involved in it,” he said.

“Most Americans recognize that what we want to do is avoid, or help people avoid, having to make this difficult choice. That nobody is pro-abortion, abortion is never a good thing.”

This is total bullshit. We do acknowledge that individual women have their own opinions on abortion and that there are women who consider abortion to be a serious moral issue. We have never made the mistake of not acknowledging that.

What we do not acknowledge much to the dismay of the anti-choice gangs is that their gangs have the right to practice their opinion on the bodies of women. In a fact a lot of us have had the audacity to publicly repudiate this made up right .

The dispute over abortion is not about “wrenching moral issues” and it never has been. It is about the very humanity of women. “Respecting” the view that women should be treated, both legally and socially, in the same manner as our pets is a slap in the face to every woman on the planet.

As for his remark that “abortion is never a good thing” - what planet/reality does he live on/in? This is yet another slap in the face to the women of the world. It might blow his mind, but women do have abortions because they consider them a “good thing”.

His statement completely repudiates their opinion that they made a good decision and buys into the anti-choice/faux-choice framing that only irresponsible sluts who want to avoid the consequence of sex get abortions and call them “good”.

Kate Harding said Obama is not a progressive and this is true, but I swear it seems that every time the man open his mouth in an unscripted situation he comes off not as a liberal with conservative leanings, but a conservative with liberal undertones who merely comes off as a liberal because the GOP has been hi-jacked by the worst of the worst.

And for those of you about to screech about this post - Barack Obama is running on the Democratic ticket. The last time I checked the Democratic Party was a liberal party thus making it completely acceptable to hold any politician running for office under it’s banner to liberal standards which includes the “wacky” idea that we women are entitled to make own reproductive decisions without interference from the state or the public.

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F14%2Fobama-abortion-is-never-a-good-thing%2F'; addthis_title = 'Obama%3A+abortion+is+never+a+good+thing'; addthis_pub = '';

Where are the atheist leaders?

If it weren’t for a blogger over on the Chicago Tribune it’s highly likely that many of us would have never heard of Monique Davis’ anti-atheist tirade. Since that time only one non-theist organization appears to have said anything and that was the Council for Secular Humanism which issued a press release calling for Davis to resign.

Everyone else has been conspicuously silent in the aftermath.

There’s not a word about it on the American Atheists site and the Secular Coalition who says it’s mission is to handle this kind of shit has also kept it’s mouth shut. The Atheist Alliance doesn’t appear to have anything to say either. The Freedom from Religion Foundation has nothing either. Even the Out Campaign whose purpose is to get scared atheists to come out of their closets has remained silent.

I’d at least have expected to find a rant over on AA about it and the Secular Coalition? It’s frigging mission statement says it’s purpose is “to increase the visibility and respectability of nontheistic viewpoints in the United States”.

One would think that a sitting representative telling someone with a “nontheistic viewpoint” that they have no right to participate in government affairs would be an opportunity for them to increase “the respectability of” said viewpoint.

This is quite disappointing. So, where are the leaders and why have they kept their mouth’s shut about this?

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F13%2Fwhere-are-the-atheist-leaders%2F'; addthis_title = 'Where+are+the+atheist+leaders%3F'; addthis_pub = '';

“Bad Day” the cause of anti-atheist rant

Monique Davis has apologized citing that she was upset and was, according to another Illinois representative, having a “bad day”.

Well, I’m having a bad day myself.

I’m catching a cold or something and I’m pretty sure I’ve managed to break one of my toes. My five year old is home sick and is doing her best to mimic Velcro. One of the cats decided to use a pair of jeans for a litter box and the other puked on sick kid’s discarded but now “favourite” piece of schoolwork.

Did I mention the mountain of laundry that needs doing? It’s huge and I swear on the life of both cats that’s it’s growing as I type this. I’m also having a really bad period that hurts almost as bad as my toe. What I’d like to do is pop a Midol or two and lock myself in the bathroom for the rest of the day.

So, I’m not quite sure how I managed to do it, but I went outside for a smoke and did not scream at the nun visiting next door.

In fact, I simply smiled at her and said “hi” just like I always do, bad day or not.

Maybe it has something to do with me not actually believing that Christianity is such an abhorrent belief system that it is imperative that the children not know of it existence to the point where Christians should be kicked out of public meetings thus sparing myself the embarrassment of being caught saying what I actually don’t believe.

But, what do I know? I’m having a bad day. I’ll apologize next week after Keith Olbermann says I’m a bad person for not using my bad day to say exactly what I don’t think about Christianity and Christians.

Now, where’d I put that Midol?

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F10%2Fbad-day-the-cause-of-anti-atheist-rant%2F'; addthis_title = '%26%238220%3BBad+Day%26%238221%3B+the+cause+of+anti-atheist+rant'; addthis_pub = '';

Monique Davis deemed “worst person” for anti-atheist tirade

Keith Olbermann’s worst person last night was none other than Rep. Monique Davis of Illinois for her anti-atheist tirade in which she stated that it was “dangerous for children” to even know of the existence of atheism and ended with ordering the target of her tirade, an atheist, out of the witness chair he was sitting in because he (and by extension all atheists) had no right to be there.

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F09%2Fmonique-davis-deemed-worst-person-for-anti-atheist-tirade%2F'; addthis_title = 'Monique+Davis+deemed+%26quot%3Bworst+person%26quot%3B+for+anti-atheist+tirade'; addthis_pub = '';

10 Things you should know about John McCain

Recently there’s been several articles about various supporters of both Obama and Clinton plan to vote for McCain should their candidate fail to cinch the nomination for the Democratic party. So, I’d like to share a list of things that *you* should know about John McCain that I picked up from Moveon.Org (the sources are after the jump):

  1. John McCain voted against establishing a national holiday in honor of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Now he says his position has “evolved,” yet he’s continued to oppose key civil rights laws.1
  2. According to Bloomberg News, McCain is more hawkish than Bush on Iraq, Russia and China. Conservative columnist Pat Buchanan says McCain “will make Cheney look like Gandhi.”2
  3. His reputation is built on his opposition to torture, but McCain voted against a bill to ban waterboarding, and then applauded President Bush for vetoing that ban.3
  4. McCain opposes a woman’s right to choose. He said, “I do not support Roe versus Wade. It should be overturned.”4
  5. The Children’s Defense Fund rated McCain as the worst senator in Congress for children. He voted against the children’s health care bill last year, then defended Bush’s veto of the bill.5
  6. He’s one of the richest people in a Senate filled with millionaires. The Associated Press reports he and his wife own at least eight homes! Yet McCain says the solution to the housing crisis is for people facing foreclosure to get a “second job” and skip their vacations.6
  7. Many of McCain’s fellow Republican senators say he’s too reckless to be commander in chief. One Republican senator said: “The thought of his being president sends a cold chill down my spine. He’s erratic. He’s hotheaded. He loses his temper and he worries me.”7
  8. McCain talks a lot about taking on special interests, but his campaign manager and top advisers are actually lobbyists. The government watchdog group Public Citizen says McCain has 59 lobbyists raising money for his campaign, more than any of the other presidential candidates.8
  9. McCain has sought closer ties to the extreme religious right in recent years. The pastor McCain calls his “spiritual guide,” Rod Parsley, believes America’s founding mission is to destroy Islam, which he calls a “false religion.” McCain sought the political support of right-wing preacher John Hagee, who believes Hurricane Katrina was God’s punishment for gay rights and called the Catholic Church “the Antichrist” and a “false cult.”9
  10. He positions himself as pro-environment, but he scored a 0—yes, zero—from the League of Conservation Voters last year.10

SOURCES:
1. “The Complicated History of John McCain and MLK Day,” ABC News, April 3, 2008
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/04/the-complicated.html

McCain Facts,” ColorOfChange.org, April 4, 2008
http://colorofchange.org/mccain_facts/

2. “McCain More Hawkish Than Bush on Russia, China, Iraq,” Bloomberg News, March 12, 2008
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aF28rSCtk0ZM&refer=us

Buchanan: John McCain ‘Will Make Cheney Look Like Gandhi,‘” ThinkProgress, February 6, 2008 http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/06/buchanan-gandhi-mccain/

3. “McCain Sides With Bush On Torture Again, Supports Veto Of Anti-Waterboarding Bill,” ThinkProgress, February 20, 2008
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/20/mccain-torture-veto/

4. “McCain says Roe v. Wade should be overturned,” MSNBC, February 18, 2007
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17222147/

5. “2007 Children’s Defense Fund Action Council® Nonpartisan Congressional Scorecard,” February 2008
http://www.childrensdefense.org/site/PageServer?pagename=act_learn_scorecard2007

McCain: Bush right to veto kids health insurance expansion,” CNN, October 3, 2007
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/03/mccain.interview/

6. “Beer Executive Could Be Next First Lady,” Associated Press, April 3, 2008
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5h-S1sWHm0tchtdMP5LcLywg5ZtMgD8VQ86M80

McCain Says Bank Bailout Should End `Systemic Risk,’” Bloomberg News, March 25, 2008
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aHMiDVYaXZFM&refer=home

7. “Will McCain’s Temper Be a Liability?,” Associated Press, February 16, 2008
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=4301022

Famed McCain temper is tamed,” Boston Globe, January 27, 2008
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/01/27/famed_mccain_temper_is_tamed/

8. “Black Claims McCain’s Campaign Is Above Lobbyist Influence: ‘I Don’t Know What The Criticism Is,‘” ThinkProgress, April 2, 2008
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/04/02/mccain-black-lobbyist/

McCain’s Lobbyist Friends Rally ‘Round Their Man,” ABC News, January 29, 2008
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4210251

9. “McCain’s Spiritual Guide: Destroy Islam,” Mother Jones Magazine, March 12, 2008
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=3519

Will McCain Specifically ‘Repudiate’ Hagee’s Anti-Gay Comments?,” ThinkProgress, March 12, 2008
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/03/12/mccain-hagee-anti-gay/

McCain ‘Very Honored’ By Support Of Pastor Preaching ‘End-Time Confrontation With Iran,’” ThinkProgress, February 28, 2008
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/28/hagee-mccain-endorsement/

10. “John McCain Gets a Zero Rating for His Environmental Record,” Sierra Club, February 28, 2008
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/environment/77913/

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F09%2F10-things-you-should-know-about-john-mccain%2F'; addthis_title = '10+Things+you+should+know+about+John+McCain'; addthis_pub = '';

Copeland snubs Grassley, requests IRS audit

Kenneth Copeland, one of the targets of an investigation by Senator Grassley, has apparently requested an audit by the IRS.

Attorneys for Kenneth Copeland Ministries sent a letter to the IRS’ Office of Examinations on Monday saying the church was willing to cooperate with a tax inquiry by the agency. Dallas television station KTVT first reported the North Texas-based church’s request for an IRS audit.

Leaders of the television ministry contend dozens of questions about expenses, executive compensation and amenities asked by Sen. Charles Grassley are similar to those posed in an IRS church tax inquiry. In the letter, attorneys for the ministry say the appropriate procedure would be for Grassley to obtain the information from the IRS after it conducts an audit of the church.

“At the conclusion of a properly conducted church tax inquiry, the Senate Committee on Finance could obtain the information Senator Grassley is seeking from the IRS through a request,” the letter said.

Copeland representatives previously delivered a letter to Grassley reiterating that the IRS, and not a Senate committee, should be dealing with the questions the Senator raised.

The request comes just days after a deadline set by Senator Grassley, whom Copeland declared a “holy war” on, went by without Copeland turning over the requested information.

I personally see this request as a sly move to make it seem like the church is cooperating while insulting both Grassley and the Senate Committee on Finance.   If I understood the Wikipedia entry correctly, the finance committee has the authority to investigate the IRS.

If that’s true, Copeland’s latest move is not unlike telling your boss you have no intention of speaking to him regarding your job but you’ve got no problem setting down with his secretary and having the same discussion.

The arrogance is just mind-blowing.  Too bad Grassley can’t fire Copeland like your boss could you, eh?

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F09%2Fcopeland-snubs-grassley-requests-irs-audit%2F'; addthis_title = 'Copeland+snubs+Grassley%2C+requests+IRS+audit'; addthis_pub = '';

Pat Robertson: Islam is not a religion

After an interview with Bernard Lewis about the “clash of civilizations” (aka: my god vs. your god) on the 700 Club, Pat Robertson went on to espouse that “Islam is not a religion”, but a “political system bent on world domination” that disguises itself as religion.

Methinks ole Pat is getting soft with age as anyone with half a brain should immediately realize that his description of Islam is, in fact, a near-perfect description of his own brand of Christianity. Even more amusing he ends by stating that we atheists should align ourselves with the likes of him because the big scary Muslims are worse than his kind. Isn’t this the first time Pat has implicitly admitted that his brand of Christianity is in fact a bad thing?

(via: Right Wing Watch)

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F09%2Fpat-robertson-islam-is-not-a-religion%2F'; addthis_title = 'Pat+Robertson%3A+Islam+is+not+a+religion'; addthis_pub = '';

Motivational poster for Atheists

motivational poster - atheists

If you liked that one, here’s one on faith, gravity and Jesus. Others can be found here.

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F08%2Fmotivational-poster-for-atheists%2F'; addthis_title = 'Motivational+poster+for+Atheists'; addthis_pub = '';

Atheist father sues Catholic mother

Here’s something to chew on. An atheist man has sued his Catholic ex-wife. At issue is the school their 14 year old son will attend. Mom and the son have chosen a Catholic school, but Dad wants him to attend a public school:

As a practicing Catholic whose eighth-grade son, Michael, has always attended parochial schools, Susan Bisig says it would be best for him to attend St. Xavier High School.

The 144-year-old Catholic secondary school also happens to be Michael’s first choice.

But Bisig’s ex-husband, David Ryan, an atheist who has joint custody of their 14-year-old son, wants Michael to attend a nonreligious high school.

And he says the Kentucky Constitution is on his side because it says no one shall be “compelled to send his child to any school to which he may be conscientiously opposed.”

The battle between Ryan and Bisig, both commercial pilots, has landed in Oldham County Family Court, where Judge Tim Feeley has said he will decide within the next couple of weeks where 14-year-old Michael Ryan will attend high school next year.

Whichever parent wins will pay Michael’s tuition, Feeley said.

As the mother of a five year old, I’m quite grateful her father and my husband is also an atheist. I can’t see either of us ever converting to any religious belief short of a lobotomy so I doubt we’ll ever have to walk that tightrope.

That said, Michael is 14 years old and should have the final say as it is his life we’re talking about here. Sure, there’s the issue of the judge postponing this battle (the judge from the divorce case told them to wait until Michael was a teenager) and going with leaving the then young Michael in the religious school, but that’s water under the bridge in my opinion.

As for Michael being taught that Dad’s a big ole sinner, I don’t think that holds much water. For starters, the school doesn’t appear to be a nutball training facility as it lists as goals these things which appear to be consistent among all the St. Xavier schools in America:

  • Provide a school that nurtures spiritual and humanitarian values.
  • Promote self-disciplined, conscience-based and personally accountable young men.
  • Prepare students for critical thinking and responsible decision making in an interdependent world.
  • Recognize the importance of exposure to and respect for the Catholic faith expressed in word and deed.
  • Recognize the importance and dignity of each individual.
  • Affirm a commitment to academic excellence and further develop a curriculum that challenges each unique individual.
  • Expand instructional techniques in recognition of the diversity of the world today.
  • Promote active involvement within the community through extensive extracurricular and service programs.

If you happen to actually know the difference between shit and shinola you probably also know that everything I’ve bolded is largely considered to be sinful by the nutball brigade. Chief among these sins is critical thinking and academic excellence. Heaven forbid a nutball actually thinking about much of anything or - worse - considering it important that children should know that pi does not equal 3.

I do take one issue with the article though. A law professor states that forcing Michael to attend a public school would be “establishing atheism”:

Stenger, who previously taught in the school of religion at University of Iowa and has a doctorate of theology from Catholic University of America, also noted that the father’s constitutional argument cuts both ways.

“The mother has equal constitutional rights not to have the court forbid a school because it is religious,” he said.

“If the father were to win, it would put the authority of the court against religion, which both the federal and state constitution forbid,” Stenger said.

“It could be called establishing atheism.”

This is just wrong. For a public school to be atheistic in it’s teaching it would have to actively teach it’s students that (all) theistic belief systems are wrong. It is ridiculous to argue that failing to instruct children to believe in (a) god(s) is the same as instructing children that there is(are) no god(s).

Furthermore, as America is a country that is dominated not just by the religious in general, but by the Christians who also have a controlling share of the nutball brigade, I’m quite sure we’d have heard about such a school by now what with “happy holidays” being solid evidence that America is out to get Christians.  They’d actually have a “war” to bitch about, wouldn’t they?

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F07%2Fatheist-father-sues-catholic-mother%2F'; addthis_title = 'Atheist+father+sues+Catholic+mother'; addthis_pub = '';

Jesus comes back

Exactly what would happen if Jesus was really up there in the sky somewhere and he came back? The JFC Show explores that scenario and it’s sure to get a few (or more) laughs.

Episode 1 (via Atheist Media):
JFC Pilot Pt 1 on FunnyOrDie.com

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F07%2Fjesus-comes-back%2F'; addthis_title = 'Jesus+comes+back'; addthis_pub = '';

How much is your daughter worth?

I bet you’re thinking “priceless”. Well, you’d be wrong. Just ask the parents of Tressa Gross. You see, Tressa went to a club back in April of 2002 where she met a man by the name of John Berger.

He raped her and killed her with a fatal dose of GHB. He admitted that he had done this and that he had drugged and raped other women to reach his goal of “having sex” with at least 100 women.

His punishment?

Five years in prison of which he only has to serve four, another four years of probation and that’s it.

That’s how much your daughter’s worth.

(via The Curvature)

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F07%2Fhow-much-is-your-daughter-worth%2F'; addthis_title = 'How+much+is+your+daughter+worth%3F'; addthis_pub = '';

Atheists have no rights in Chicago

Just ask Representative Monique Davis, a Democrat mind you, who recently went off on Rob Sherman as he was speaking before the House State Government Administration Committee about the governor’s recent grant of $1 million to a Baptist church.   Representative Davis had this to say:

it’s dangerous for our children to even know that your philosophy exists! Now you will go to court to fight kids to have the opportunity to be quiet for a minute. But damn if you’ll go to  [court] to fight for them to keep guns out of their hands. I am fed up! Get out of that seat!

You have no right to be here! We believe in something. You believe in destroying! You believe in destroying what this state was built upon.

This story has shown up in two places with both pieces written by the man who broke the story.  One piece is pointing out what happened and the other piece pointing out how what happened has been ignored by the larger Chicago community.

I have no doubt that had Rep. Davis told another theist that merely knowing of their existence was “dangerous” for children and that said theist had no right to participate in the government there would be calls for her to resign effectively immedietely, but her target was a mere atheist.

And that makes it all cool, right?

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F07%2Fatheists-have-no-rights-in-chicago%2F'; addthis_title = 'Atheists+have+no+rights+in+Chicago'; addthis_pub = '';

YouTube - Atheist Statistics 2008

Here’s some statistics about atheists to brighten your day:

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F05%2Fyoutube-atheist-statistics-2008%2F'; addthis_title = 'YouTube+-+Atheist+Statistics+2008'; addthis_pub = '';

Ted Turner: Global Warming will lead to cannibalism

Here’s something to perk you up this morning. According to Ted Turner, 30 to 40 years from now most of humanity will be dead because the planet will be eight degrees hotter causing a near total crop failure. The survivors will be living in a failed state such as Sudan or Somalia and will have to draw sticks I suppose to see who gets to be dinner.

If steps aren’t taken to stem global warming, “We’ll be eight degrees hotter in 30 or 40 years and basically none of the crops will grow,” Turner said during a wide-ranging, hour-long interview with PBS’s Charlie Rose that aired Tuesday.

“Most of the people will have died and the rest of us will be cannibals,” said Turner, 69. “Civilization will have broken down. The few people left will be living in a failed state — like Somalia or Sudan — and living conditions will be intolerable.”

If that isn’t enough to tick people off (ask yourself this: when’s the last time you heard a white man talk about cannibalism becoming a part of survival for white people), his comments on the Iraqi resistance are sure to. In the same interview he stated that the Iraqi resistance members are ‘patriots’ who don’t like us because we invaded their country. He went on to say that we (American civilians) if they’d taken over Washington, DC.

I think that they’re patriots and that they don’t like us because we’ve invaded their country and occupied it. I think if the Iraqis were in Washington, D.C., we’d be doing the same thing: we’d be bombing them too. Nobody wants to be invaded.

I have to say I agree with that statement. I don’t know how it was in Iraq before our invasion, but America is stuffed to the gills with patriots/nationalists and I have no doubt that any invasive force would find out that there were far worse things than dying.

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F05%2Fted-turner-global-warming-will-lead-to-cannibalism%2F'; addthis_title = 'Ted+Turner%3A+Global+Warming+will+lead+to+cannibalism'; addthis_pub = '';

Who pissed in Chris Hedges Cheerios?

Alternet recently kicked off a fundraising event and having apparently registered with the site at some point I received an email asking for money. Having fallen far behind on my reading this past month  or so I decided to check out what Alternet had up that I may have missed. Well, I apparently missed the earth shattering event of Chris Hedges discovering that someone, presumably an atheist, had taken a piss in his cheerios.

The author of American Fascists has a new book out titled “I don’t believe in Atheists” and Alternet decided to publish an article by Hedges that’s just a stone’s throw from being completely unhinged. Well, that’s a lie actually. There’s not a trace of anything that suggests the article was ever hinged to begin with.

Did you know that we modern atheists “embrace a belief system as intolerant, chauvinistic and bigoted as that of religious fundamentalists” who want to see to the “silencing or eradication” of those who disagree with us?

Yes, it was news to me also.   I suppose we should notify the leaders of the Gay Agenda that they aren’t the only ones out to destroy civilization itself.

(more…)

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F02%2Fwho-pissed-in-chris-hedges-cheerios%2F'; addthis_title = 'Who+pissed+in+Chris+Hedges+Cheerios%3F'; addthis_pub = '';

Happy National Atheist Day

Today is April 1st, which thanks to loving kindness of the Right Reverend Ray has been deemed National Atheist Day. I suppose I should be upset as I am one of the dreaded new atheists, but puh-lease! Ray & his sidekick Kirk think a Chiquita banana is evidence of their space daddy’s existence.

Thus being called a fool by the likes of Ray & Kirk it’s not too far removed from being called a “doodoohead” by an actual kid. So, here’s a video from the Cirque du Soleil featuring clowns instead:

Feel free to post links to foolish videos, photos & the like in the comment section. Your inner fool (and me) will thank you.

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F04%2F01%2Fhappy-national-atheist-day%2F'; addthis_title = 'Happy+National+Atheist+Day'; addthis_pub = '';

Obama can’t be fooled anti-choice activists?

As far as Hillary and Barack are concerned I’ve been of the mind that there is nothing radically different between them to justify being a near zealot for one or the other. However, a post about Barack’s position on abortion recently landed in my gmail that seems to show that while Barack may be for unity, he’s not for compromising on things he considers to be right.

The subject in question is abortion/reproductive rights and Barack seems to have went above and beyond the call of duty by voting against various bills that seek to undermine abortion rights. One such bill was SB1093 which would have resulted in pre-viable fetuses being called children which would entitle them with constitutional rights (the right to life and due process would essentially bar women from obtaining abortions). Barack had this to say (PDF):

Number one, whenever we define a previable fetus as a person that is protected by the equal protection clause or the other elements in the Constitution, what we’re really saying is, in fact, that they are persons that are entitled to the kinds of protections that would be provided to a — a child, a nine-month-old — child that was delivered to term.

That determination then, essentially, if it was accepted by a court, would forbid abortions to take place. I mean, it — it would essentially bar abortions, because the equal protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this is a child, then this would be an anti-abortion statute.

Barack has also come out against parental notification laws and the funding of abstinence only sex “education”. He considers reproductive health care to be basic health care and supports OTC emergency contraception for both adult women and minors. He also supports having insurance companies cover birth control.

If that wasn’t enough to kiss him over, he also opposes the Hyde Amendment, doesn’t think public money should be spent on Crisis Pregnancy Centers and would get rid of the global gag rule reinstated by George Bush when he took office.

I find this quite unusual for a politician who speaks about uniting us as such unity is normally achieved by undermining the rights of women, people of colour and gay people. Granted, Barack does not support marriage equality and this is a negative to be sure and one I’m personally disappointed with him over, but he doesn’t seem like the type who’s going to compromise by backing down as has been quite common with democratic politicians lately.

I think that’s what we really need.  Someone who isn’t going to compromise on what’s right, just on things that are little more than superficial differences (ie, “you say po-tay-to, I say po-tah-to”).  We’ve been compromising on the former for nearly eight years now and look where it’s gotten us.

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F02%2F27%2Fobama-cant-be-fooled-anti-choice-activists%2F'; addthis_title = 'Obama+can%26%238217%3Bt+be+fooled+anti-choice+activists%3F'; addthis_pub = '';

Huckabee endorses personhood for eggs

Republican candidate Mike Huckabee has endorsed a bill in Colorado that if passed into law will amend the constitution of Colorado to state that personhood begins at fertilization.

Doing so will effectively make abortion a crime as one of the rights of personhood is the right to life.

Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee on Monday endorsed a proposed Colorado Human Life Amendment that would define personhood as a fertilized egg.

The former Arkansas governor and Baptist minister also supports a human-life amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Huckabee spoke favorably about the Colorado ballot initiative, sponsored by 20-year-old Kristi Burton and her Colorado for Equal Rights group, during his Friday visit to Colorado Springs.

On Monday, Huckabee lent official support to the measure.

“This proposed constitutional amendment will define a person as a human being from the moment life begins at conception,” Huckabee said in a statement.

“With this amendment, Colorado has an opportunity to send a clear message that every human life has value,” Huckabee said. “Passing this amendment will mean the people of Colorado will protect the sanctity of life from conception until natural death occurs.”

Burton’s initiative, if approved by voters in November, would extend state constitutional protections to every fertilized egg, guaranteeing the right to life, liberty, equality of justice and due process of law.

Some are saying that this bill is a new tactic in the drive to return to the days when abortion was illegal, but I disagree.

It used to be that they argued that women had a duty to carry pregnancies to term. Now they argue that the the state has a duty to see that pregnancies are carried to term. The rights and privileges of women have always been considered to be, at best, secondary in terms of importance.

If anything, this bill and the others like it are just more honest. They don’t even give lip service to the rights of women. In fact, I think an argument can be made that they’re worse than the bills that have come before. Women largely do not exist in these bills. We are implicitly demoted to little more than publicly owned life support systems with no rights or privileges except those our owners grant us.

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F02%2F27%2Fhuckabee-endorses-personhood-for-eggs%2F'; addthis_title = 'Huckabee+endorses+personhood+for+eggs'; addthis_pub = '';

If your brain could vote, who would it choose?

Hillary & Barack

You may be dazzled by Barack and think McCain is the last surviving member of the GOP Clown Car, but what about your lizard brain? Does it agree? Take the test and find out.

I was pleasantly surprised to find out that while my lizard brain agrees that McCain and Huckabee suck, it hadn’t been suckered into thinking Barack was worse than Hillary due to the misdeeds of some of his followers. Hillary and Barack came out dead even at the top of the list.

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F02%2F23%2Fif-your-brain-could-vote-who-would-it-choose%2F'; addthis_title = 'If+your+brain+could+vote%2C+who+would+it+choose%3F'; addthis_pub = '';

Bah humbug!

So it isn’t Christmas, but that’s the kind of mood I’ve been in these last couple of days. Between the poor little persecuted Christians to the Obamabots who hate Hillary more than they support Barack, I’m in a very bad mood. So, here’s one of my favourite songs, Bodies by Drowning Pool.

addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fbligbi.com%2F2008%2F02%2F21%2Fbah-humbug%2F'; addthis_title = 'Bah+humbug%21'; addthis_pub = '';