Author Archive for Blogonaut

Health Commission Issues Public Warning regarding Aussie Anti-Vaccination group

The New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission(HCCC) has issued a public warning about the misnamed? Australian Vaccination Network.  The commission, after two complaints from the public, investigated the AVN finding that the group:

  • provides information that is solely anti-vaccination
  • contains information that is incorrect and misleading
  • quotes selectively from research to suggest that vaccination may be dangerous.

[source]

The AVN was recommended by the HCCC to place a statement prominently on their website saying:

  • The AVN’s purpose is to provide information against vaccination, in order to balance what it believes is the substantial amount of pro-vaccination information available elsewhere.
  • The information provided by the AVN should not be read as medical advice.
  • The decision about whether or not to vaccinate should be made in consultation with a health care provider.

 

The AVN failed to do so and a a result the HCCC has issued the following warning:

The AVN’s failure to include a notice on its website of the nature recommended by the Commission may result in members of the public making improperly informed decisions about whether or not to vaccinate, and therefore poses a risk to public health and safety. 

The AVN’s response to the warning is apparently to wilfully misunderstand the warning.

happy

 

In the end though, was the recommendation of the commission that onerous?  The first point actually ask them to be honest about what their position is.  The second in all fairness protects the AVN (legally)as much as it does the general public.  The third suggests that they pass readers on to health care providers to make the final decision – surely the AVN ha a list of health care providers who support the views they push – after all there is a big debate in the medical community about immunisation right?

*sound of crickets chirping*

Will it stop the actions of the AVN?  Probably not, but it’s a huge blow to their already rock bottom credibility.

Related posts:

  1. Australian Vaccination Network (AVN) to be investigated
  2. "Love them, Protect them, Never Inject them"- pro choice message of the AVN
  3. Unspoken danger of the Australian Vaccination Network

We deserve the Nanny state we will get

I have read a and reviewed Blind Faith and Little Brother this year – both offer a stark warning about overzealous government control facilitated by technology.  I also plan to reread Orwell’s classic and rather prescient 1984.  Indeed it seems most timely with the latest revelations about government plans to monitor us, and the subsequent censoring of those plans:

The federal government has censored approximately 90 per cent of a secret document outlining its controversial plans to snoop on Australians’ web surfing, obtained under freedom of information (FoI) laws, out of fear the document could cause “premature unnecessary debate”.

Ben Grubb, SMH

Read the whole article and shudder at the Newspeak employed by departmental flunkies.  Then perhaps reflect for a second that the current government wants to record  our online life, but doesn’t want to tell  to what extent, nor for what reason.

National security?  Just in case you might be doing the wrong thing at some time in the future? I wonder will federal politicians be subject to recording? Who knows? But apparently we can’t handle talking about it.

More likely, we are eminently capable of debating the tripe that the government offers us in terms of IT Policies – if the filter is anything to go by.

Are we talking about this though, outside of the tech proficient and the civil libertarians (and why is this often a pejorative term)?

No, enough of the populace is enamoured with a f*cking cooking show that a debate between two potential leaders of the country has been shifted so as to not conflict.

If you can’t be bothered to wake up for the ten seconds that it requires to give damn, enjoy the nanny state you are served.

End Rant

Related posts:

  1. British setting up a surveillance state?
  2. Happy Territory Day
  3. Catholic World Youth Day creates blow out in State coffers

The Australian Book of Atheism

AustBookAtheism_TEMP_LR Just a little heads-up for all of you starting to write your lists for that gift giving celebration we have on the 25th of December.

Scribe publications will be releasing:

The Australian Book of Atheism, edited by Warren Bonnet of Embiggen books fame,  in December of this year .  It will feature some 35 contributions from Australian atheist, rationalist, secular, humanist, and skeptic talent , many of whom participated in the 2010 Global Atheist Convention in Melbourne.

Including:

  • Robyn Williams
  • Michael Bachelard,
  • Leslie Cannold,
  • Plus new voices from the blogging and podcasting sphere’s

Related posts:

  1. “The Rise of Atheism” Australian Atheist Conference 2010
  2. Freethought University Alliance
  3. Global Atheist Convention – Over half the tickets are sold

Little Brother by Cory Doctorow

Little-BrotherI am no longer an e-book virgin.

I have just finished reading Cory Doctorow’s Little Brother, which you can purchase through your local bookstore or if you have an e-reader or Kindle for PC you can download it here legally and for free in multiple formats. Cory does this with all of his novels – that’s right all for FREE.

If you have trouble understanding this concept check out his explanation here.

I have been sceptical about e-readers.  I thought I was destined to be the one of the last of a dying breed of people – those brought up on paper books. Indeed I struggle at reading long pdf’s and in the past if even if a book existed free or in text/ html  I much preferred to read it in paper format.

E-readers and e-reading software I think has changed that, especially for me.  I am now considering the Kindle (one of my greatest frustrations with reading Little Brother was that I had to lug the laptop around, not as I expected, eye strain from reading off the computer screen)or if possible a cheaper reader that can handle multiple formats.

But about Little Brother

You might have guessed by the title that the book is a riff off Orwell’s 1984 and you’d be right.  The story is one of resistance against the state but set in very near future ( it’s set after   9/11 , but the technology used is  I think very current)it’s what might happen to American freedoms if another attack were to occur on American soil.

As far as I can tell Little Brother is  Doctorow’s first young adult novel, the protagonist is Marcus, a 17 year old computer and tech geek. While playing an ARG(Alternate Reality Game) with school mates Marcus is caught in a DHS (Department of Homeland Security) dragnet, after a terrorist attack in his city.  Marcus is smart and has a good understanding of his constitutional rights, it’s his defence of these rights that really propels the story:

“What have you got to hide?”

“I’ve got the right to my privacy,” I said. “And I want to speak to an attorney.”

“This is your last chance, kid. Honest people don’t have anything to hide.”

“I want to speak to an attorney.” My parents would pay for it. All the FAQs on getting arrested were clear on this point. Just keep asking to see an attorney, no matter what they say or do. There’s no good that comes of talking to the cops without your lawyer present. These two said they weren’t cops, but if this wasn’t an arrest, what was it?

In hindsight, maybe I should have unlocked my phone for them.

Source: Little Brother, end of chapter 3

Marcus ends up being interred in a Guantanamo bay like facility an action that propels him into becoming a rebel with a cause.

What did I like?

The story plays to my left leaning liberal sensibilities.  It highlights everything that is worrying about western society’s quick turn to the right, to the climate of fear promoted by governments that see fear and security as election winning platforms.  The book may be set in an American context, but it has applications for a far wider audience.  Take cc camera surveillance in the UK or indeed the railroading of the Internet Filter in Australia ( or even more sinister, the Ozlog affair).

Doctorow’s writing was  fast paced, exciting and easy to read.  Like other Young Adult novels I have read, this one didn’t strike me as being any less of a rollicking good read for that fact.  There’s a bit of violence, a sex scene and description of torture so it’s not Alice in Wonderland, but it is pitched at 15 to 17 year olds.  I found some of the info dumps distracting from the flow of the book, but these were both interesting and necessary in there own right, especially considering what the book is intended to be, beyond just an action packed tale.

There’s more to this book than the story

While both 1984 and Little brother can be described as a fight for justice, and  liberty against the oppressive state, Little Brother is also something different.  1984 is a warning, a parable about what might occur (indeed some may say Orwell was almost prescient in some of his storytelling).  Little brother is simultaneously  a  story, a manual for resistance against an oppressive state and an attempt to get teens to look at the double edge nature of new technology.  Contained within it pages are references to real world resources and technologies for guarding your privacy or avoiding electronic surveillance.  Indeed the book has been most recently translated into Persian by Iranian activists in the hope that it might inspire a response in Iranian youth.  The book contains wealth of historical information on civil disobedience, enough hopefully to whet the young adolescent thirst for knowledge.

Skeptics and fans of reality will, I think enjoy Cory’s tone, here’s an example-my emphasis:

Which is why I prefer to inject a little randomness into my attacks on gait-recognition: I put a handful of gravel into each shoe. Cheap and effective, and no two steps are the same. Plus you get a great reflexology foot massage in the process (I kid. Reflexology is about as scientifically useful as gait-recognition).

Little Brother, Chapter 1

So do yourself a favour, buy the book and/or download it for free.

Just read it, I don’t think you’ll be sorry.

Edit: Please find the  link (right, save as) to copyright free (Australia)version of George Orwell’s 1984 in .prc format for Kindle

Related posts:

  1. My Brother’s Keeper.
  2. Book Review – God Hates You, Hate Him Back
  3. Big Brother is quite literally watching… err reading you

Burqa Banning…thinly veiled State Oppression?

nony

France has just passed through its lower house, a law banning the Burqa.  Now I’ll preface this post with the following:

  • I am not a lawyer
  • I can’t read, write speak or understand French even to phrasebook standard
  • My interest and hence knowledge of the issue is fairly shallow but…

I find the full veil to be a abhorrent, archaic symbol of oppressive and outdated Islam (indeed I am not sure if it is part of Islam rather than just cultural baggage) .

That being said the banning of the full veil in what can be considered to be one of the birthplaces of modern democracy has me decidedly uncomfortable.  I can not help but draw parallel between Sarkozy’s focus on Muslims and Gillard/Abbot’s focus on boat people, the former appears  to me to be about pandering to the political right, the xenophobic elements with in French society rather than protecting women from oppression – in essence politics and power mongering at the expense of a minority.

Indeed in both cases the numbers of people are almost insignificant – France has 5 million Muslims of whom 2000 women wear(or are forced to wear ?) the Burqa. The number of illegal boat people entering Australia (who are in the main genuine refugees) is dwarfed by the number of illegal over-stayers arriving by plane.

I think there are better ways of supporting women and changing the attitudes of Muslim men.  Indeed there are some French Muslims that appear to be doing this.  It strikes me that focussing on Islam and singling it out will only encourage some Muslims to take up the wearing of Muslim dress as an outward display of support for their religion – in much the same way as I might wear a t-shirt with Atheist printed across the front in response to vilification from the religious.

And what of those women who are really oppressed by their religion or their husband’s interpretation of it – could it be argued that this law would discourage them from appearing in public, where they might gain access to the very resources they need to liberate themselves?

It easy to support laws when they will have no measurable impact on your life, when you can’t conceive of being subject to them. Ms Alliot-Marie, who tabled the bill informs us:

…the bill, which makes no reference to Islam or veils, was not aimed at “stigmatising or singling out a religion”.

source

It reminds me of many of the council bylaws enacted by Alice Springs,town council, that don’t contain references to aboriginals, but which are obviously directed towards them.

So will these new laws, which I understand will need to be broadly phrased so as to not be directly discriminating, be brought to bear,at the convenience of the state, on individuals that wish to protest anonymously?

I think part of good law making is having the forethought to see beyond the immediate situation.

Your thoughts?

Related posts:

  1. The Girls of the Red Mosque and Ayaan Hirsi Ali
  2. British setting up a surveillance state?
  3. We deserve the Nanny state we will get

Viability of Ethics Classes questioned by…the church.

In a stunning show of concern Jude Hennessy, director of the Confraternity of Christian Doctrine in the Wollongong Diocese has been quoted as saying:

“It is really difficult to see how proponents of ethics classes will in a similar way attract and motivate, adequately train and resource these classes in an ongoing fashion,”

[source]

This is in response, I believe to the knowledge that that a Departmental ruling prevents currently employed teachers from taking the classes reported by the Sydney Morning Herald:

Proposed ethics classes in NSW are at risk after the Department of Education ruled full-time teachers cannot conduct the lessons.

Full-time teachers, some of whom are teaching the current ethics trial at 10 public primary schools across the state, will not be able to do so if the classes are introduced permanently, The Sydney Morning Herald reported on Tuesday.

[source]

Touching, that a representatives of SRE providers can be so concerned, perhaps in the spirit of providing good education for heathens they could donate to the Saint James Ethics Centre.

Now, the SMH doesn’t cite any sources but what I find curious is the Dr Cam chief architect of the trial, reports in his interview with the Token Skeptic’s Kylie Sturgess,  that they have been overwhelmed with volunteers for the position.  Listen here (right click, save as) to his interview with Kylie.

Of course I am cynical that Ms Hennessy is actually concerned.  Indeed I wonder why she bothered to comment at all other than to contribute to a talking down of the pilot. But then she is of course lumbered with promoting a tired, and  contradictory world view -that in my recent experience has resulted in religious groups resorting to cheap magic tricks to get across the idea that R.E. is fun.

What’s next? Bring the clowns?

Related posts:

  1. Ethics trial evaluation is to commence
  2. NSW ethics class trials, but religious still want in
  3. NSW Government allowing religious to influence secular ethics trial for non believers

Unspoken danger of the Australian Vaccination Network

If you missed Lateline’s story on the Health Care Complaint Commission (NSW) handing down some adverse findings for the fringe anti-vaccination group the AVN here it is:

Now the obvious dangers of this group are that they could/are? contribute to a fall in vaccination rates.  They appeal to emotion, misunderstand the evidence surrounding vaccination and spread this misunderstanding.

Their extreme views, do have the potential for detracting from debates/discussions that we really need to have about commercial entities involved in producing  pharmaceutical products,and the influence of private, profit driven research on health.

Discussion like the following bought to us by the Token Skeptic podcast.

Token Skeptic #23 – On Big Pharma – Interview With Dr Leslie Cannold and Michael McRae

To be frank the Us vs Them mentality that the AVN’s behaviour fosters shits me.  I want careful discussion and debate from “qualified” people not from irrational people who jump in the pond and do nothing but muddy the water.

Related posts:

  1. Australian Vaccination Network to be Audited, Illuminati plot?
  2. Australian Vaccination Network (AVN) to be investigated
  3. Stop the Australian Vaccination Network

Church admits liability in Toowoomba rape case

Long time readers will remember me covering this horrible story in these posts -

When you enable rapists it might just hit you where it hurts…

Three heads roll in Toowoomba school rape case

Toowoomba catholic teacher “rape case” update

It’s not often that we get good news when the story centres around the Catholic Church and child rape so allow me to bear good tidings via the Australian

THE Catholic Church has made a sweeping admission of legal liability for the rape and abuse of girls at a Toowoomba primary school.

In one of the most comprehensive wins for victims of child abuse in Australia, Toowoomba bishop Bill Morris has formally admitted liability and opened the door to a massive compensation payout to 13 schoolgirls in a proposed mediated settlement to be overseen by former High Court judge Ian Callinan QC.

[source]

One of the parents of the abused children wants full disclosure of church actions in addition to any compensation they might be ordered to pay, so that the church’s actions (or lack thereof) will be on display.

Bishop Morris has suggested a mediation process overseen by a High Court Judge in order to protect the victims and their families from enduring further hardship. Is it too cynical for me to believe that this process might also have advantages for the church?

Related posts:

  1. Three heads roll in Toowoomba school rape case
  2. Toowoomba catholic teacher “rape case” update
  3. When you enable rapists it might just hit you where it hurts…

Saturday Steampunk

Intro: Saturday Steampunk is an irregular blog topic that I post on, sometimes it even occurs on a Saturday. You can see other Saturday Steampunk posts here .

 

Today’s post is a bit of a collection of things I have stumbled upon over the last week. 

Steampunk Cupcake holders

il_430xN.146366446First we have Clockwork cupcakes for those of you into exploring the culinary delights with a bit steampunk flare, or indeed if you are hosting a Steampunk party.  A hat tip goes to The Steampunk Home for discovering these cute little decorative peices available from  Geekinesis’ etsy store.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dr. Grordbort’s: XENODEFUGIO SUBTILTUS

drgbugxenodefugioblrg

For those Steampunk aficionados out there with deeper purses than I, you might want to check out Weta’s range of Venutian insectoids.

To the left is the The Xenodefugio, or as it is more commonly known Gumbolt’s Wind Rat a limited edition hand sculpted alien insect mounted behind Perspex.  It can be yours for $395 US – slightly more than the cupcakes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Project Gutenburg:

images Well of course I have known about this project for some time, but the advent of e-reader software, particularly kindle for pc, has made the free books here infinitely more accessible. 

I have been checking out some old titles like Jules Verne’s A journey to the Centre of the Earth and The Time Machine by HG Wells. Do yourself a favour, get some e-reader  software an download some classic now.

Related posts:

  1. Saturday Steampunk – Steampunk Cuttlefish
  2. Saturday Steampunk – Budget Steampunk hack “Travelling specimen drawers”
  3. Saturday Steampunk – Steampunk in Oxford

Lutheran “Exorcism” team walk away with restraining orders

According to ABC online:

Prosecutors have dropped assault charges against eight men who had been accused of staging an exorcism, in exchange for restraining orders.

Adelaide Magistrates Court heard each of the men denied the allegations, despite agreeing to restraining orders.

[source]

I commented on the original story here in July of last year.   As it stands the 8 men involved in the “alleged” exorcism have had the following charges against them dropped -

  • False imprisonment
  • Assault

in return for consenting to restraining orders.

I am curious as to  why the charges were dropped

  • lack of evidence?
  • 8 men’s word against a teenage victim?
  • the effects of challenging respected elders within a small community?
  • a young victim who just wants the whole incident to be over?

I will be trying to find out more information on the case, when and if it’s transcribed.  But I think its safe to say I won’t be wearing any atheist paraphernalia the next time I go wine tasting in the Barossa.

Related posts:

  1. South Australian policeman stood down for exorcism
  2. Australia’s 5 Worst Religious Child Sex Offenders
  3. Exorcism (see Deliverance)…

Ethics trial evaluation is to commence

South Australia academic Dr Sue Knight has been selected as the independent evaluator of the NSW Ethics trial.  Her bio can be found here and you will note after a quick read through she appears to be eminently qualified to tackle this task.

The Sydney Morning Herald reports, that at least one church is prepared to remain non-committal on her appointment:

‘We are glad there has been an appointment to the independent evaluation,” said Jude Hennessy, the director of the Confraternity of Christian Doctrine for the Wollongong diocese.

”We know little about Dr Knight. We hope she will be independent.”

One wonders what is meant by that last statement -  “we hope that she won’t suggest an implementation”?

Of course it would have been nice if the various churches aligned against the trial (which was, by no means all of them) could have managed to be non-committal about the trial process.

Dr Knight will be tasked with:

  • Canvassing the views of major stakeholders, including the religious faiths opposed
  • Evaluating the viability of the St James model for wider use
  • Evaluating the trials efficacy in improving student’s understanding
  • Suggesting improvements

So here’s hoping that we will see no more whining or attempts at interference from the churches,  they will have a chance to state their case to Dr Knight.  Here’s hoping that the trial was beneficial for the children involved and if it was that NSW can become a leader in promoting ethical education in Australia’s state schools.

Related posts:

  1. NSW Government allowing religious to influence secular ethics trial for non believers
  2. Support the NSW Ethics Trial?
  3. Ethics Trial in NSW’s schools

Happy Birthday P.T. Barnum

Phineas_Taylor_Barnum_portrait

July 5th is the birthday of Phineas Taylor Barnum or P.T. Barnum as he is more commonly known.

If you are a self identified Skeptic you should at least have heard of “Barnum statements” a common example of the way fraudsters, hoaxers, fortune tellers and magicians manipulate their mark with the Forer effect.

If you have a interest in history, you might also know that he was a debunker and is famous, amongst other things, for offering one of the first monetary prizes($500) to any medium who could prove they could communicate with the dead.

Barnum was much more than this though and the wiki page here, is a good place to start your history lesson on, who at the time of his death was perhaps the worlds most famous American.

His debunking is almost a sideline to this larger than life figure – businessman, a promoter, a hoaxer, a philanthropist, a politician, a circus king and a reformer.

If you have some time today delve into the life of this interesting character of yesteryear.  For further reading  check out:

The Life of Phineas T. Barnum by Joel Benton available in multiple formats.

Related posts:

  1. Happy Birthday to Me
  2. Happy Birthday Dad!!
  3. Godless in America

Kitty Flanagan offends – accused of bigotry and hate speech

The Australian Catholic League is every so slightly miffed at Kitty Flanagan for having a dig at Catholic beliefs in her segment on Channel Ten’s 7pm project. The Australian Catholic league had this to say:

Ms.Flanagan was supposed to talk about how the teachers of the trial Ethics classes are going  to be volunteers and not full time teachers, just like they are in scripture classes. Instead she used her segment to launch a bigoted and ignorant hate speech on religious people, and especially Catholics. She dismisses religious as fiction, which is fine, this is after all opinion. She did however cross the line when she took aim at some of Catholicism’s most sacred beliefs especially with those in regards to the Eucharist.  What is interesting is she leaves out other non-Christian religions.

Channel 10 Gives Anti-Catholicism A Free Ride

So prepare yourself for the extremely bigoted and hateful diatribe from Kitty

Was it offensive?

Probably to Catholics, and some Christians.  But then do you really believe in a talking snake? Or indeed that the wine in the Eucharist does actually turn in to the blood of Christ, that it’s not just symbolic(then again what does the symbolic eating and drinking of Jesus say)?

Indeed in drinking the blood of Christ who will give you eternal life, can you deny the connection with Vampirism. If you find what she’s said offensive please let me know why?  I think this is very tame.

Hate speech I don’t think so.

Pick on other religions too

There’s probably room to argue that Kitty could have spread her targets out to include other Christian denominations.  Indeed my Catholic RE classes were very liberal compared to that which I hear offered by evangelicals. That being said I have not heard strong campaigning against the ethics trial coming from the “other religions”.

Does it help the debate?

No, I think it detracts from it.  It was funny but ultimately making fun of Catholics won’t win you support for the ethics trial.  I am not sure this was the right forum for the joke.

Related posts:

  1. NSW ethics class trials, but religious still want in
  2. Make a stand – The organised and well funded attack on ethics trials
  3. Parents shouldn’t be forced to choose between ethics and religious education.

Atheist Foundation of Australia to appear before an Australian Senate Inquiry

Independent Senator Nick Xenophon has being attempting to beat some sense into Australian Tax Law around the issue of the tax exemptions that are applied to religious and other charitable organisations.  As it currently stands religions need not be actually involved in charity to get certain tax exemptions.  The pursuit and promotion of a religion is deemed to be a charitable or beneficial act in itself.

The recent revelations about the Church of Scientology and South Australia’s own Agape Ministries cult has brought this loophole to the fore and it now appears that a Senate Inquiry into the institution of a Public Benefits Test will happen.

Low and behold for the first time in Australia’s political history the representative of a atheist organisation will be asked to appear before the enquiry.

This media release from the offices of the Atheist Foundation of Australia:

For the first time in the history of Australian politics a representative of a national atheist organisation has been asked to appear before a Senate Inquiry.  This is a significant event for the Atheist Foundation of Australia and all freethinkers.

David Nicholls (President of the AFA) will participate in a teleconference on Monday 28th June 3:30 PM – 4:15 PM (EST).  He will be commenting on the AFA Submission (No. 25), “Parliament of Australia: Senate: Committees: Economics: Inquiry into Tax Laws Amendment (Public Benefit Test) Bill 2010.”  The Submission can be viewed here. http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/economics_ctte/public_benefit_test_10/submissions.htm

The conference will be broadcast live on the 28th June: http://webcast.aph.gov.au/livebroadcasting/Default.aspx

This is indeed significant.

Related posts:

  1. Atheist Foundation of Australia to complain to the Tasmanian Anti Discrimination Commission
  2. Atheist Foundation of Australia launches new forum
  3. “The Rise of Atheism” Australian Atheist Conference 2010

An Atheist for PM?

Well if you told me last week to choose between the unlikely outcomes of a) the Socceroos beating Serbia by 7 + goals or b) Australia having its first female prime minister I probably would have gone with the former.

As it was Australia beat Serbia 2-1 and Julie Gillard scored a win by forfeit.

Much is and should be made of the fact that Australia has a female Prime Minister, it’s a long overdue first.  Though this in no way guarantees, that we will see tremendous change for women, but it is inspiring.

Many of my fellow atheists were also tweeting about the fact that she’s  our first Atheist Prime Minister (forgetting old agnostic Hawke of course).  I was happily re-tweeting this with abandon when it occurred to me that this was the first I had heard of it.  So I decided to do some checking.

So is she an Atheist?

The two strongest points of evidence are

You’ll forgive me if I am not convinced.

The proof of the pudding will be in the eating.  Will Julia court the religious as Rudd had just finished doing?  Will she can the ridiculously biased chaplaincy scheme?  Will she see sense on the filter?

Who knows, let’s just remember that no one gets to the top without having to make some deals and political commentators have been pretty clear that the labour right has made it possible for Julia to get the top job.

Edit: confirmed 29/6/2010 she’s a non-believer.  Apparently the ACL aren’t fussed.

Related posts:

  1. A Religious Australia
  2. Greens to push for counsellors over chaplains in schools
  3. Global Atheist Convention – Sold Out

Highlights of the Christian Gabfest

It’s been reported that Cardinal Pell sought to influence Christian voters:

Catholic Archbishop George Pell told the virtual audience he was concerned about the Greens gaining the balance of power in the next Senate.

“Their program is explicitly anti-Christian,” he said.
[ABC online]

Did he highlight which parts were anti-Christian? No, just fired a broad missive that he hopes no Christian will question.  Perhaps its because he feels he has less leverage over greens MP’s?

Not to be outdone though Jim Wallace of the unrepresentative ACL was quoted as saying

Our common purpose here tonight is not to see the Church in a power position over the state but instead to bring Christ’s influence into government

[ABC online]

Well, one would think that the abundance of Christians in parliament would bring that influence.  But of course Jim’s talking about a very special conservative type of Christianity, one that concentrates on the important issues challenging Australia like:

  • ensuring marriage laws aren’t extended to same sex couples
  • that the Lord’s prayer isn’t dropped from Parliament

One also wonders if the leaders will be meeting with the heads of other religions or perhaps with humanists or non believers?

Related posts:

  1. Thou shalt not get involved in politics…
  2. Onward Christian soldiers
  3. Pell fears Anti-discrimination is impacting on religious freedom

Skeptic Zone Episode 87 – Featuring Sean the Blogonaut and Adelaide Skeptics

zonelogo_smallMy interview with members of Thinking and Drinking Skeptically in Adelaide is now available in Skeptic Zone Episode 87 along with the Think Tank and Kylie Sturgess’ interview with Dr Janis Bennion from Ladies Who Do Skepticism.

Enjoy and sorry about the wind

Related posts:

  1. Skeptic Zone #66 featuring Sean the Blogonaut
  2. Pimping the Skeptic Zone
  3. New Podcast and Blog – The Skeptic Zone

Happy Science Another cult misusing science?

Descending to us from the 9th heavenly realm is El Cantare, or Master Ryuho Okawa, here to bring you Happiness through Happy Science.

Operating 3 outlets in Australia, Happiness Science, promises that:

[by]studying together in joy,harmony and deep-found respect. Happy Science
can resolve all world conflicts and bring love, peace, happiness and prosperity to the world.

[Pg 4 - Intro to happy science]

So what is Happy Science?

It’s a movement (business?) started by Master Ryuho Okawa, self proclaimed reincarnation of El Cantare, the supreme god.  Started in 1986 it claims to be one of the most influential movements of the 21st century – which is of course why you are only hearing about it now – obviously you are behind the ball and need to catch up ;) .

It claims a Buddhist base, and an openness toward other religions

Is it science?

Not from where I am standing.  It is distinctly religious. I am not sure if El Cantare is having trouble with translation though, the original Japanese is Kofuku-no-Kagak  for any Japanese speakers.

He explains the science bit in the FAQ on his Australian website.

  • Happy Science is a Buddhist based organization, Because of Buddhist teaching, Happy Science believes human beings having infinite potential. They are all children of God. They all have Gods nature, Buddha nature.
  • Happy Science is more than Buddhism. Happy Science rather focuses on how to flourish people’s Buddha nature. Happy Science does not stress DON’T but DO as an angel of light-to-be. Regarding DON’T do, it is enough to follow the law.
  • Happiness is what we pursuit, and science is education. Education means that we educate how to be happy scientifically, on the universal rule, mechanism. Happy Science educate mechanism to be happy.

So is it a deliberate and calculated misuse of the word science to garner supporters, targeting those seekers who are tired of the old religions?  I’ll leave it up to the reader but I observe:

 

  • Appeal to the comforting, non-threatening Buddhism
  • An appeal to “we are like Buddhism but better”
  • Followed by an appeal to science

Who is Master Okawa?

Information on Okawa is fairly light, even from his own website.  He claims to be

  • A graduate of Tokyo University
  • Studied finance at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York.
  • Have published 500 books

 

Is this a dangerous cult?

Is it another Aum Supreme Truth cult? It’s hard to say.  It seems to on the surface be a very successful business, selling books and DVD’s, similar in some respects to Scientology in that regard.  Dangerous to your wallet definitely and perhaps we should leave it at caveat emptor. 

I have found some claims online, these seem to emanate from the same person on different forums

They endlessly sell books, tapes, seminars, prayers and all. This is how it’s done in japan or I should say japanese people. I MEAN ENDLESS. I remember how they sold picture of Okawa framed in gold for thousands of dollars.

Free meditation seminar in your city? Seems like they don’t have the guts to demand money from non japanese but they get very pushy with the japanese.

I’ve actually heard him say in one of the member only dvds “Love me more than you husband or wife or children or mom or dad” RELATIONSHIP CONTROL! In another one of those dvds, they actually made a suggestion in the line of fortune that you have comes from god, so it should be given back to god (okawa) and they were featuring this one family that donated a property that’s been in the family for generations and saying how this was better than leaving it to their children or grandchildren.

SCARY–they are so after your money. And once you get caught in this they’ll mind control your money out of you by saying things like, it’s a miracle to be here when he’s here, and a rare opportunity in your many reincarnations to be able to make donations and they’ll come up with all types of various offerings possible to the point that every call or email that you get from them is about another offering and I’m not talking about tens and twentys but hundreds and even thousands of dollars.

They’re trying to open up more branches here and I think they are taking advantage of the fact that people here can’t read what’s being said or written about them in google japan in japanese. There are lot of people and ex staff out there regretting the time and money spent on them and or trying to get their family out of it. And I think people here are vulnerable because of this recession and all.

France officially identified them as a cult which I think is a smart move and wish authority here would really check them out and do the same. They have all the signs of a cult. If I don’t like it so much, why don’t I just stay away? Well what if you have some simple and gullible relatives or family members that you love and needs to be protected? I am very FED UP.

One last thing, what’s in their books sound like they make a lot of sense because they’re based on legitimate religion and spiritual people that existed in the past.

[source]

It’s blatantly obvious to me what a colossal con this is.  As to what pressure the organisation can exercise over its followers I don’t know.  I would be interested in hearing people who have had a less than happy experience with Happy Science.

That being said this article from the Japanese Times last year shows a somewhat sinister view of this reincarnated Buddha and his political plans:

As a historic general election looms on Aug. 30, Japan’s long-suffering electorate faces a clear choice: vote for the conservative party that has virtually monopolized power since 1955, or opt for its more liberal but untested rival, which promises long-awaited reform. For those with a taste for the apocalyptic, however, there is always the Happiness Realization Party.

According to the Happiness Realization Party’s Web site, President Ryuho Okawa is a reincarnation of Buddha who achieved Great Enlightenment in 1981 "and awakened to the hidden part of his consciousness, El Cantare, whose mission is to bring happiness to all humanity." COURTESY OF THE HAPPINESS REALIZATION PARTY

Offering what it calls a "third choice," the Happies have an eye-catching manifesto: multiply Japan’s population by 2 1/2 to 300 million and make it the world’s No. 1 economic power, and rapidly rearm for conflict with North Korea and China.

[Japan Times, Tuesday, Aug. 4, 2009]

Doesn’t sound to happy to me.

If you are looking for real Happiness science you might start here

Many thanks to one of my readers for bringing this to my attention let me know if you want to be credited.

Related posts:

  1. Embiggen Books : An Oasis of Science and Skepticism
  2. The Cult of Mercola
  3. The path to my Atheism