Second Class: Attendance lower. Students worked on papers with the peer(s) who showed up. We broke early.
Third Class: Attendance good. Asked students if they really wanted to work on papers. They said not really. I broke off class immediately. There were cheers.
I was saying to my students a few weeks ago that after I give a lecture, my audiences never seem to break out in rapturous applause, but they did when I told them that they were not going to have to listen to me at all.
Funk dat. And this mere days after after I received the following feedback from one of my peers who attended a talk about incorporating science into the writing classroom that I and a colleague both presented at. It was sent out to the entire department, which was a nice bonus.
Fellow Smarty-Pants--
I wanted to send a note about the talk organized by Kendra the Vampire Slayer today. I unfortunately had to miss the [other campus event] due to teaching, and I know many of you missed [their presentations]. I was so inspired by what I heard from Bug Girl and Bing McGhandi that I felt compelled to share.
Bug Girl and Bing both gave papers that really demonstrated how exciting teaching composition can be (it's true!) and gave specific examples of how they've managed to capture the imaginations and intellects of our particular students here at Pretty Good Univeristy. Both of their talks clearly demonstrated the potential we have as Smarty-Pants to have our students re-think science (and arguments, evidence, and claims) in ways that are quite revolutionary for them. Although I had to go teach before Bug Girl's excellent talk concluded, I'm totally writing her an email to ask her about these awesome online discussion blogs she's having her students make...
The talks were witty and smart, and reminded me of my grad schools days when I got to hear speakers several times a month talk on topics that really mattered to me. Thanks to Bing, Bug Girl, and Kendra for taking me back to that space today!
I just had to crow a little bit. Skepticism can sell, folks, this is what I am saying.
Finally I have a few days before other obligations drag me kicking and screaming back into the real world. I will be giving a variation on the paper I gave the other day in St. Louis at the end of the month, and I will be there for the next St. Louis Skeptics in the Pub, which is a fortuitous bonus. I've been thinking about the logo contest that they are having, and I actually have an image that, if edited properly (maybe morphed in with a photo of the Gateway Arch?), would work really well for a skeptical organization in St. Louis, MO:
It's a bent spoon! Get it? The Arch as a bent spoon! How about that shit? If I can get access to Photoshop, I'll have a submission for the contest during the Skeptics in the Pub thingy. Last, I finally have some time to work on the WorldviewNightmare podcast.
Neat.
HJ








Planet Atheism buttons
FAQ (includes joining info)
RSS feed
Email subscription

