Monthly Archive for June, 2011

Et tu, Betty and Veronica?

Now here's a criminal abuse of my youth: the Archie comics were written for a time by a demented fundamentalist. How crazy, you might ask? Read his comic book explanation of the Rapture. That is some insane stuff.

Read the comments on this post...

Why Did This City Council Use Public Funds to Bring in a Christian Band?

The Parks & Recreation Department in Liberty, Missouri is sponsoring a summer concert series, which sounds all well and good. In fact, this August, the KC All Stars will be playing.

Over the weekend, though, the concert series kicked off with a performance by Sidewalk Prophets, a Christian band.

The event cost the city $9,500. It was “heavily promoted on Christian radio stations Calvary 88.5 and K-Love 97.3.” And a non-perishable food collection was taken up for a local ministry:

Food collected at the concert will be donated to In As Much Ministries, a food bank for needy families, said [parks director Dennis] Dovel. He said he was pleased with the way it all played out for the first concert.

“I think the event went off fantastic. I don’t think we could have asked for a better group to start off our concert series,” Dovel said. “It brought a lot of people to the Square.”

I don’t mind the voluntary collection for a food bank, but why are public officials using tax money to bring in a decidedly Christian group to perform?

I called Mr. Dovel to ask him about it and this is what he said:

We are 70% supported by fees and 30% supported by taxes… we are not making any statement as far as denomination, Christianity or anything like that. We brought them in purely from an entertainment standpoint.

From talking to him, I don’t get the impression that this was some nefarious Christian scheme. It just sounds like ignorance — they don’t know that they did anything wrong. Considering they had an audience of up to 2,000 people, they’re probably just thrilled so many people showed up.

If I lived in Liberty, though, I would be pretty pissed off that my city officials paid for a Christian band to come to town to spread their gospel. Let the churches spend the money, not the local government.

Potential lawsuits aside, if you live there and you’re upset about how some of your tax money is being used, let the city council and Parks & Rec department know how you feel. Otherwise, nothing’s going to change.

(Thanks to @kmccoy for the link)

Christians: What Do You Want to Ask An Atheist?

My friend Rachel Held Evans, who wrote the awesome book Evolving in Monkey Town, is embarking on a project where her fellow Christians can ask a guest from a different background (Mormon, Orthodox Jew, etc.) whatever questions they want, and the guest will respond to the most popular questions the following week.

I’m happy to be the first guest and Christians are welcome to submit their questions for me on her site… BRING IT!

*Hemant puts on boxing gloves…*

Trilobite Boy chibi!





Follow the intermittent adventures of Trilobite Boy!


- - - - - - - -

Original artwork on The Flying Trilobite Copyright to Glendon Mellow under Creative Commons Licence.

"Men who charge into a vacuum" or the very best bits from John Kenneth Galbraith

John Kenneth Galbraith - Wikipedia

“People of privilege will always risk their complete destruction rather than surrender any material part of their advantage. Intellectual myopia, often called stupidity, is no doubt a reason.”

John Kenneth Galbraith in “The Affluent Society (1958)

“All successful revolutions are the kicking in of a rotten door. The violence of revolutions is the violence of men who charge into a vacuum.”

John Kenneth Galbraith in “The Age of Uncertainty” (1977)


“Few can believe that suffering, especially by others, is in vain. Anything that is disagreeable must surely have beneficial economic effects.”

John Kenneth Galbraith “The Age of Uncertainty” (1977)

“The enemy of the conventional wisdom is not ideas but the march of events.”

John Kenneth Galbraith in “The Affluent Society (1958)”

“Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.”

John Kenneth Galbraith in “Economics, Peace and Laughter” (1971)

“In any great organization it is far, far safer to be wrong with the majority than to be right alone.”

John Kenneth Galbraith in The Guardian (1989)

“There is something wonderful in seeing a wrong-headed majority assailed by truth.”

John Kenneth Galbraith in The Guardian (1989)

“We can safely abandon the doctrine of the eighties, namely that the rich were not working because they had too little money, the poor because they had much.”

John Kenneth Galbraith in The Guardian (1991)

“There's a certain part of the contented majority who love anybody who is worth a billion dollars.”

John Kenneth Galbraith in The Guardian (1992)

“It is my guiding confession that I believe the greatest error in economics is in seeing the economy as a stable, immutable structure.”

John Kenneth Galbraith in “A Journey Through Economic Time” (1994)

“When you see reference to a new paradigm you should always, under all circumstances, take cover. Because ever since the great tulipmania in 1637, speculation has always been covered by a new paradigm. There was never a paradigm so new and so wonderful as the one that covered John Law and the South Sea Bubble — until the day of disaster.”

John Kenneth Galbraith quoted in Ben Laurance and William Keegan, "Galbraith on crashes, Japan and Walking Sticks," The Observer (1998)

“I react pragmatically. Where the market works, I'm for that. Where the government is necessary, I'm for that. I'm deeply suspicious of somebody who says, "I'm in favor of privatization," or, "I'm deeply in favor of public ownership." I'm in favor of whatever works in the particular case.”

John Kenneth Galbraith in “Booknotes interview” (1994)

“Clearly the most unfortunate people are those who must do the same thing over and over again, every minute, or perhaps twenty to the minute. They deserve the shortest hours and the highest pay.”

John Kenneth Galbraith in “Made to Last”(1964)

http://www.facebook.com/pages/John-Kenneth-Galbraith/89900217423

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kenneth_Galbraith
"John Kenneth "Ken" Galbraith (October 15, 1908 – April 29, 2006) was a Canadian-American economist. He was a Keynesian and an institutionalist, a leading proponent of 20th-century political liberalism. His books on economic topics were bestsellers from the 1950s through the 2000s and he filled the role of public intellectual from the '50s to the 1970s on matters of economics.
Galbraith was a prolific author who produced four dozen books and over a thousand articles on various subjects. Among his most famous works was a popular trilogy on economics, American Capitalism (1952), The Affluent Society (1958), and The New Industrial State (1967). He taught at Harvard University for many years. Galbraith was active in Democratic Party politics, serving in the administrations of Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson; he served as United States Ambassador to India under Kennedy. Due to his prodigious literary output he was arguably the best known economist in the world during his lifetime and was one of a select few people to be awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom twice, in 1946 and 2000, for services to economics."

Comments

Don’t Do This To a Anti-Gay Christian Preacher

When an anti-gay Christian preacher is spouting his/her hate speech, there are clever ways to strike back…

There are even scandalous ways to strike back…

… but you don’t want to actually touch/harass the preacher.

Unfortunately, that’s what 74-year-old gay rights supporter Joan Parker did recently:

… Parker admits she kissed a preacher on the cheek at the event, proclaimed by the Salisbury mayor as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Pride Day.

“He was just waving his arms and has a Bible in one hand, up and down, and screaming at the top of his lungs, ‘sodomites’ and ‘you’re going to hell,’” Parker said in a phone interview. “I thought he needed a hug. So I gave him a hug.”

At some point, Parker said, the preacher turned to yell to a man with a camera to take a picture of her. Also at some point, she kissed him. On the cheek, she says, not on the mouth.

“She might disagree with this, but it wasn’t done as a show of affection,” [police chief Rory Collins] said. “It was an unwanted touching.”

Hate to say it, but Collins is right. Parker overstepped the boundary and shouldn’t have done that.

It’s public property. Kiss your partner all you want. But don’t touch someone who’s not asking for it.

(Thanks to Edward for the link)

Oh noes! The Irish have abandoned Mother Church!

Y'all remember Michael Voris, the Catholic Dominionist who wants America to make the Pope King of the United States? He's nuts, obviously, but now we get to see him make his sad face. He visited Ireland, at the invitation of some diocese to babble about "the sacred heart of Jesus", and while he was there, he did some man-on-the-street interviews. He is horrified to discover…most of the Irish have left the Catholic church!

Also, there are gays!

I think he should have also asked all those people if they believe in leprechauns. I think he would have been even more disillusioned.


Here's a hilarious addendum: Michael Voris is banned from speaking at his home diocese. He's too crazy even for the Catholic church.

Read the comments on this post...

On your knees America and Pray… that’s how we solve it.

Liv said:



Texas government has a plan to solve this nations problems. No it's not trying gather every one to do good. It's prayer and starvation. For once I agree with them because it could curb American obesity. If everyone stops eating right now, perhaps we can end our economies problems, and stop rising unemployment? Just a week without food will end all wars and bring peace to nations ridiculed by famine and genocide. Then when we've fixed all the world's problems we're all going to get-together and do a Baptist style pot-luck after church on Sunday.

On your knees America and Pray… that’s how we solve it.


Liv said:



Texas government has a plan to solve this nations problems. No it's not trying gather every one to do good. It's prayer and starvation. For once I agree with them because it could curb American obesity. If everyone stops eating right now, perhaps we can end our economies problems, and stop rising unemployment? Just a week without food will end all wars and bring peace to nations ridiculed by famine and genocide. Then when we've fixed all the world's problems we're all going to get-together and do a Baptist style pot-luck after church on Sunday.

The Problem with Theodicy…

When people start discussing philosophy or Christian apologetics, I tend to get bored easily, but Zach Weiner does a nice job explaining the problem with theodicy (why there’s suffering in the world if god exists):

That’s panel one. The rest is here :)

Why I Support Marriage Equality

I’ve been talking about marriage equality a lot. Of course I’m ecstatic for my gay friends in New York who will now be able to marry. But I have to admit, I think there’s a lot of benefit here for us heterosexuals as well.

Dan Savage once remarked that gays made better lovers, because they actually have to talk about making love. Every heterosexual couple knows that tab A goes into slot B, well before things get serious. This leads to a tendency to think that the whole tab A/slot B operation is the most important thing, or even the only thing. Lacking one of the those parts, homosexuals have to put a little more thought into it.

I’m hoping that homosexuals will turn out to be better spouses as well as better lovers.

In America we’ve made tremendous progress on changing the nature on marriage. The people who complain that we’ve redefined marriage are a century too late. We’ve dismantled coverture, we’ve relaxed divorce laws and we’ve struck down anti-miscegenation laws. Legally, we’ve made marriage more egalitarian and more personal. But socially, the assumption that marriage is just a pair of interlocking gender roles still lingers.

I was reminded of this recently when I was doing an online survey for an advertising company. I got to see a string of ads from various makers of prepared food. Every single one of the commercials had the same plot: wife cooks, husband and children (hard to tell the difference) eat, and wife is looking for a way to spend less time in the kitchen while still satisfying her hubby.

Hopefully, same gendered couples are going to have more freedom from social expectations to define their own relationships. Since they can’t fall into the same standardized gender roles any more than they can have heterosexual sex, they’ll be free to work out their own relationship.

If California can make the next step, then something like 1/4 of the population will have marriage equality. As homosexual couples become more visible in this new climate, hopefully people will come to realize that the way our parents lived is not the way that we have to live. Pressure on heterosexual couples to try and recreate the standard sitcom nuclear family might then begin to relax.

And we’ll have taken the next step in the process of moving marriage way from being an institution and towards being a relationship. Rather than being a set of obligations defined from outside, the relationship could be something that’s negotiated by the participants.

(I tend to think in terms of gender roles here. Other people might be more radical and think of poly relationships or open marriage, which are other possibilities. My own marriage – eleven years today and still extremely happy – is pretty white-bread. Everything else looks like it would take way too much energy.)

Was Jesus Worth Following?

Were the teachings of Jesus really as morally incredible as his followers claim?

Not so much, says Peter Brietbart, producer of the terrific-looking new short film Madman or Something Worse.

I’ll sometimes hear Christians quote Mahatma Gandhi: “I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.” I don’t know if Gandhi ever actually said that, but there’s a sense that even though some Christians are jerks, Jesus was a great role model.

Brietbart argues against that, though. He goes after the popular beliefs attributed to Jesus and gets people to think twice about them:

Should you always love your neighbor?

Can someone truly forgive you for your sins?

Is it right to preach about the afterlife when there’s no evidence it exists?

Jesus of Nazareth was an awful moral philosopher. He compares badly to such modern greats such as Mill, Rawls or Ross and also to historical thinkers such as Aristotle, Diogenes or Plato. His moral contributions are not original, and his original contributions are not moral.

Moderate Christians love to say they’re “followers of Christ” and not parrots of the Religious Right, but maybe that not a huge step up.

The entire video is about 15 minutes long and definitely worth checking out:

Part 1:

Part 2:



Kudzu Jesus Appears On Utility Pole

Kudzu Jesus Appears On Utility PoleAccording to the Kinston Free Press,  “Jesus Christ” recently materialized in the guise of a Kudzu vine on a utility pole in  Lenoir County, North Carolina.Truly folks, I can’t make stuff like this up. The pole, about a mile south of Kinston, has attracted attention of some  area residents. Some say the kudzu-covered post bears a striking  resemblance to Jesus’ crucifixion.Kent Hardison, who runs Ma’s Hotdog House less than a half mile from  the pareidolia, rides by the Christ-resembling post each day. He said  when he first saw the kudzu growing he almost sprayed it with herbicide.“I glanced at it, and it looks like Jesus,” Hardison said. “I thought, ‘You can’t spray Jesus with Roundup.’ ”Kudzu, an invasive species from Japan, causes 1.5 million dollars of damage a year to power lines not to mention all the damage it does to other plant life and animal habitats in the U.S.; yet, these fine industrious citizens have decided to spare this particular vine because they think it’s “looking out” for them.I find the fact that so many otherwise intelligent human beings in the world renounce their reason on matters to do with religion to be a constant source of perplexity.Much thanks to Robyn West.

According to the Kinston Free Press,  “Jesus Christ” recently materialized in the guise of a Kudzu vine on a utility pole in Lenoir County, North Carolina.
Truly folks, I can’t make stuff like this up.
The pole, about a mile south of Kinston, has attracted attention of some area residents. Some say the kudzu-covered post bears a striking resemblance to Jesus’ crucifixion.
Kent Hardison, who runs Ma’s Hotdog House less than a half mile from the pareidolia, rides by the Christ-resembling post each day. He said when he first saw the kudzu growing he almost sprayed it with herbicide.
“I glanced at it, and it looks like Jesus,” Hardison said. “I thought, ‘You can’t spray Jesus with Roundup.’ ”
Kudzu, an invasive species from Japan, causes 1.5 million dollars of damage a year to power lines not to mention all the damage it does to other plant life and animal habitats in the U.S.; yet, these fine industrious citizens have decided to spare this particular vine because they think it’s “looking out” for them.

I find the fact that so many otherwise intelligent human beings in the world renounce their reason when it comes to matters of religion to be a constant source of perplexity.

Also posted at tumblr.

Much thanks to Robyn West.

Manifestations of Misogyny

The wizarding world of Harry Potter was touched by misogyny when Afshan Azad, a Muslim cast member who played the role of Padma Patil, was beaten severely for dating a Hindu. According to court records, Azad’s brother “left his younger sister bruised and swollen after grabbing her by the hair, throwing her across a room and punching her in the head and back as she cowered on the floor….” When Azad’s father learned of the situation, he told her brother to kill her. The brother, a good Muslim who had been drinking, then tried to strangle her.

The Manchester Evening News report of this event is harrowing reading. Ultimately, Azad (somehow) lived through three hours of hell before escaping through her bedroom window and reporting the beating to the police the next morning. I was disappointed, but not surprised, to read that Azad “wrote a letter to Judge Roger Thomas QC asking for her brother not to be locked up and saying that she had forgiven him. The court heard that Ms. Azad has never supported the prosecution despite giving police an initial statement.” One of the most nefarious aspects of religious and cultural misogyny is the way women internalize it. Azad’s plea to the judge is but one example of this phenomenon. It’s one thing to forgive her brother, but quite another to aid him in evading the just consequences of his behavior. Another example of internalized misogyny in this story is the response of Azad’s mother, who called Azad a whore and told her that “she would have to be sent to Bangladesh to marry” a Muslim man. Wow. Talk about blaming the victim! It’s obviously Azad’s fault that her brother beat her because she’d had the audacity to fall in love with a non-Muslim. That rendered her a whore who deserved either banishment from her home and family or death. I’m glad that Azad a) survived this encounter, and b) did not move to Bangladesh per her family’s dictates. Instead, she left her home in Manchester and now lives in London. This gives me hope that she’ll break the religious and cultural shackles that led to her horrific experience.

Now, before we non-Muslims get smug about our superiority, we’d better take a look at events happening right here in the USA. The great state of Kansas recently enacted abortion regulations that will effectively shut down abortion providers until they can satisfy stringent new licensing requirements. The providers were given a generous ten days notice of the changes, which include substantial physical plant modifications that will take weeks or months to complete, and which providers claim are medically unnecessary. Kansas used to have three abortion clinics. One of these was forced to close recently and the remaining two will likely be closed by the end of this week unless a temporary injunction against immediate implementation of the law is granted. This is very bad news for the people of Kansas. Especially the women.

Let’s cut out all bullshit and face an ugly fact: laws like these are designed solely to control the sexuality, reproduction and overall health of American women. They are nothing less than institutionalized misogyny – misogyny that is embedded in American culture, its dominant religion, and, when states can get away with it, its laws. The fact that many women support such measures is testament to the power of internalized oppression. Thousands, perhaps millions, of people have been really pissed off since the passage of Roe v. Wade, and they’ve made numerous attempts to overturn it, or, failing that, to sidestep it. This latest move by the state of Kansas is an example of the latter. The state has not outlawed abortion. It can’t do that. Therefore, it’s done the next best thing: it’s made abortion within its borders inaccessible. For awhile anyway.

Both Islamic and Christian cultures and religions have long, infamous histories of misogyny. In Christianity (but not Islam), women have been blamed for Original Sin. In both traditions, women have been cast as wicked temptresses of men (which is why many Muslim women are required to hide themselves under layers of cloth). In both traditions, women have been cast as inferior to men (a position that has been systematically reinforced through religious and social customs, as well as law). Misogyny is not unique to Islam; it’s just extraordinarily blatant in that milieu. Islamic misogyny is akin to the Old South’s Jim Crow laws – easy to oppose because it’s so damned obvious. Christian misogyny is more akin to the Northern racism I witnessed during the Civil Rights era – subtler than Jim Crow, and consequently more difficult to identify and destroy. Subtlety doesn’t make it any less real, and it certainly doesn’t make it any less dangerous, even deadly, than Islamic misogyny. It simply makes it harder to fight.

It’s only fair to note that many Christians and Muslims reject the misogynistic mores of their religions. And many of them have joined nontheists in opposing those who want to sustain those shameful traditions. As the accounts discussed above make clear, believers and nonbelievers alike have a long struggle ahead of us if we hope to rectify our society’s wrongs. But we will overcome.

– the chaplain


Filed under: abortion, atheism, indoctrination, legal, politics, rationalism, religion, sex, society, spiritual abuse, women's rights

Royal Rejoicing

John Ivison has an appropriate and funny column in the National Post today. He is covering the "Royal" visit of two young people from London (in the picture) and his comments will make anyone smile.
The news media will be all over the Royal honeymooners and Gay Pride week here in the centre of the Canadian universe during our National holiday weekend.
I can't think of how to relate these two events. Yes, there are queens involved, not royal. There will be Royal parades and Pride parades, pomp and pageantry at both and ass-less chaps and mounted horsemen (I'm not going to touch that one).
The Royals aren't coming to Toronto, too bad. Maybe it had to do with Pride Week, competition you know. But missing Toronto is a bit like trying to get the flavour of France without going to Paris. Why choose the Calgary Stampede over Pride week? Why piss off the animal lovers AND the LGBT community?
The big media story here this entire week, has been the failure of the newly installed Mayor of Toronto (Rob Ford) to acknowledge the Pride events in his city. Maybe we should be pissed off at the Royals too?     

Atheism From The Minds Of Christian Babes

No, this isn’t a post about what attractive, female followers of Jesus think of atheism (no one gives a shit about what the Palins think).

Atheists are bombarded on a daily basis with religion, primarily Christianity (or at least what passes for it these days). In many ways, atheists have a better vantage point for analyzing religions, because believers are often in a situation where they cannot see the forest for the trees. While the Christian has convinced themselves their faith is all about things like love and compassion, those on the outside looking in have a clearer view of reality.

This isn’t because atheists are just so amazing and intelligent, but because Christians basically never shut the fuck up about their religion. Their dogma is everywhere, and it permeates American laws and social norms. We all know what Christianity says, and those of us on the outside have a much clearer view in regards to what Christianity actually does.

Just as an example, the Christians have attempted to appropriate marriage as an institution that was “created/ordained by God.” Logically, this makes no sense, because people have been forming their own family units since before God was ever a twinkle of the eye of the Bronze Age desert Semites who borrowed him from their Pagans neighbors. However, taken in the context of the belief that this God has been around since the beginning of time, it makes a bit more sense (or at least achieves an amusing semblance of sense).

So, let’s flip the tables.

What do Christians know about atheism? Well, as it turns out, not much. Most Christians I have met cannot even properly define what atheism is. Really stop and consider that for a second, because this may be one of the root causes of the other problems I want to delve into regarding Christian perceptions of atheism.

Frankly, I am astounded by the things I have heard Christians say about atheism and atheists (both in general or about specific atheists). If you had asked me a decade ago what I thought of Christians, when I was a newly minted atheist of just a few years, I would have told you Christians were mentally deranged, and that they clearly suffered from some form of cognitive disorder.

Over time, I found this insanity to be far too systematized to be organic. Generally, a mental disorder is expressed differently in different patients. For example, if two people are hallucinating, they probably won’t see the exact same thing. If you’re an atheist for any length of time and you engage Christians in discussion, you will find that the madness they exhibit is far too standardized and similar to be the result of spontaneous mental failure.

In other words: Christians are saying the same crazy things, so the most likely reason for this is not disease, but rather that crazy people are feeding crazy ideas to Christians.

What sort of crazy ideas? While there are a finite number of these dim-witted views, they are far too numerous to list them all here. In fact, I would also need an inordinate amount of time to collect all of these ideas, because the roots of Christian apologetics runs deep. They’ve been shoveling bullshit for thousands of years, after all, so the pile is bound to be pretty high.

Just some examples:

- atheists believe in God, they just refuse to worship out of pride
- atheists worship Satan
- atheists leave religion because they cannot adhere to God’s morality
- atheists are angry at God
- atheism is a phase some young people go through
- atheists are possessed by demons
- atheists believe nothing created everything
- atheists are all gay
- gay people are all atheists
- atheists can’t be trusted (since they can’t swear on the Bible)
- there are no atheists in foxholes
- Charles Darwin recanted on his deathbed
- atheists have no moral compass
- atheism is a religion
- atheists can’t prove there isn’t a God, therefore there is one

And the list goes on, one canard after another.

Most Christians don’t talk to atheists about atheism. Let’s be honest: religion doesn’t come up very often in daily conversation. I’m sure Christians interact with plenty of atheists on a daily basis, they just don’t know it. This is why it’s such a shame to me how closeted most atheists are, because most people only have one type of interaction with atheists.

I would be willing to bet a fair amount of the exchanges a Christian knowingly has with atheists will be adversarial in nature. The oft-cited “they got offended by me saying ‘God bless you’ when they sneezed” or “these atheists were protesting the Christmas tree downtown” are the only time some Christians are exposed to atheism.

This might account for some of the hostility Christians display, a sort of misguided, ill-informed counter-counter-protest attitude. Christians have no way of knowing how unbelievably fucking annoying they can be, so in their mind, here’s the scenario: atheists appear magically out of the blue to screw up the happy, smiling community that just wants to keep on marginalizing people in peace.

Of course they are then going to get upset at these atheists who are suggesting such extreme ideas as not using public funds to erect a monument to the ten commandments (over half of which aren’t even laws…).

It really comes down to two different ways of looking at things: those who are rational, and those who rationalize. Those who are rational tend to want to change what is wrong with the world to make it a better place. Those who rationalize want nothing to change, and in order to defend it, will dig down deep and pull every possible argument they can find out of their ass and shove it in your face, like a rhetorical Dirty Sanchez.