It's always a surprise. I'm lounging in St Paul with an iced tea, browsing the City Pages, the news and arts weekly, and after reading a good article about the recent pharmaceutical debacle with levaquin, I turn the page, and there's my name. dang, that's right — I'm expected to perform.
Read the comments on this post...Monthly Archive for May, 2011
The women in our movement aren’t asking a lot.

Those of us who are aware of the sexism need to call it out when we see it and do everything we can to not add to the problem.
If we say or do something wrong — and I’ll be the first to admit I’m guilty of that — let’s hope it’s unintentional and that the offender is quick to apologize.
(via atheistcartoons)
Hey look! It’s a woman trapped by Christianity:

David Hayward explains:
Even though we might agree with the idea of a mutual submission, these selected words have been turned into words of servitude and slavery. They are being used to confine her, control her and keep her. Even the cross, which might be used as a metaphor of volitional suffering, has been turned into a tool requiring it. The bible laid before her which contains powerful words of liberation has become a text of bondage. There is food and drink as promised, but they are obviously kept beyond her reach. The only way she can enjoy them is if they are fed to her. Even her nakedness, her vulnerability, which should be beautiful and cherished, is used as a weapon against her. She must keep silence and not question her captors because it always results in chastisement.
Obviously, not all Christian men act like this. But the institution as a whole has no intention of treating women as equals. They’ll turn away female preachers. At times, the women don’t even speak, letting the man do it on their behalf. In fact, the ideal Christian woman — the Proverbs 31 woman — is supposed to be supportive of her husband’s whims (not the other way around), a homemaker, and a good cook. She “seeks her husband’s approval before making purchases.” She’s an embarrassment to feminists. (Though, as one Christian friend put it, you could say she “runs her own business.”)
You never hear about holy texts saying a woman should be assertive or have opinions of her own. (I’ve heard a number of Christian women say they had a hard time dating men in their church because they were so opinionated and self-confident.)
Of course, it’s not like other faiths are crying out for independent women, either. They want women to be submissive to their husbands, silent assenters to whatever the men want.
You have to wonder why so many women remain in the Christian church when it holds them down as much as it does.
***Edit***: Commenters are right to point out that it’s tough to “break free” when both of your hands are in shackles like the woman in the picture. However, while society is dominated by males in general, I do think religion makes things even worse for women.
It’s tough for anyone to leave his/her faith because it involves leaving a social network and support system — and women have it tougher than men. But there are many women who left their faith and came out stronger because of it. I hope we (as atheists) can help out those who don’t hold superstitious beliefs but still want the community support.
(via nakedpastor)

"If I knew of something that could serve my nation but would ruin another, I would not propose it to my prince, for I am first a man and only then a Frenchman ... because I am necessarily a man, and only accidentally am I French."
- Charles de Montesquieu or Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu (1689 - 1755)as quoted in "Pensées et Fragments Inédits de Montesquieu" (1899)
"I would as soon say that religion gives its professors a right to enslave those who dissent from it, in order to render its propagation more easy. This was the notion that encouraged the ravagers of America in their iniquity. Under the influence of this idea they founded their right of enslaving so many nations; for these robbers, who would absolutely be both robbers and Christians, were superlatively devout."
- Charles de Montesquieu or Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu (1689 - 1755)in De l'Esprit des Lois (1748) (The Spirit of the Laws)
"The Pope will make the king believe that three are only one, that the bread he eats is not bread...and a thousand other things of the same kind. "
- Charles de Montesquieu in "Lettres Persanes"(1721) (Persian Letters)
"I can assure you that no kingdom has ever had as many civil wars as the kingdom of Christ."
- Charles de Montesquieu in Lettres Persanes (1721) (Persian Letters)
"Religious wars are not caused by the fact that there is more than one religion, but by the spirit of intolerance...the spread of which can only be regarded as the total eclipse of human reason."
- Charles de Montesquieu in Lettres Persanes (1721) (Persian Letters)
"The deterioration of a government begins almost always by the decay of its principles."
- Charles de Montesquieu in De l'Esprit des Lois (1748) (The Spirit of the Laws)
"But constant experience shows us that every man invested with power is apt to abuse it, and to carry his authority as far as it will go. "
- Charles de Montesquieu in De l'Esprit des Lois (1748) (The Spirit of the Laws)
"If one only wished to be happy, this could be easily accomplished; but we wish to be happier than other people, and this is always difficult, for we believe others to be happier than they are."
- Charles de Montesquieu
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montesquieu
Charles-Louis de Secondat, baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu (18 January 1689 – 10 February 1755), generally referred to as simply Montesquieu, was a French social commentator and political thinker who lived during the Enlightenment. He is famous for his articulation of the theory of separation of powers, taken for granted in modern discussions of government and implemented in many constitutions throughout the world.
I think this pencil drawing of "Capturing Man-Thing" I did a couple of years back will finally get the colour treatment using ArtRage 3 over the next few days.
Man-Thing is © Marvel Comics and I am doing this fan piece without permission. I do not plan on making any profit from it.
I think this pencil drawing of "Capturing Man-Thing" I did a couple of years back will finally get the colour treatment using ArtRage 3 over the next few days.
Man-Thing is © Marvel Comics and I am doing this fan piece without permission. I do not plan on making any profit from it.

Jesus Ziodberg, or Son of Cthulhu?
In the last episode of our competition to raise money for Camp Quest, I had elegantly and cunningly turned the tables on Team Beat PZ: after trouncing them thoroughly in all fundraising efforts, I had maneuvered them into desperately offering all kinds of humiliating forfeits if they should win the competition, so I reversed course and urged all of my minions to donate to them. I am now in the enviable position of "pwning" the other team, in Greta Christina's words, if I raise more money than they do, or of humiliating them, in my words, if they have to carry through with their promised penalties.
They have stepped into my lair and my tentacles enfold them. There is no escape.
Now, though, only $8 separates us in this final day of the race.
My opposition is confused and in disarray, and they don't know whether to counter my last gambit or to persist in their path to humiliation. I don't care either way. I've already won, no matter which way they stumble. Donate as you will. I'm preparing my victory gloat either way.
I have heard glimmerings that they are planning a final surge, but I am unconcerned. Whatever side the surge occurs on, I am victorious.
Read the comments on this post...To give a simplistic answer to the question posed, I think the world would be at peace without religion and war would not exist if there were no soldiers. Now before any one blows a fuse, note that this is a naive answer to a crude question. I’m am well aware that religion is not the only reason groups of humans war against each one another but if religion didn't exist, the nations of the world might be more inclined to settle their differences diplomatically and the need for soldiers might be vastly reduced.
As far as honoring the service members who have who have been sacrificed in the name of "protecting our freedom", I think she has done the loved ones of those who lived as atheists and non-Christians a tremendous disservice.
What do you think?
Hat tip to Dana H. and Robyn W. for the video.
Crossposted on tumblr.
To give a simplistic answer to the question posed, I think the world would be at peace without religion and war would not exist if there were no soldiers. Now before any one blows a fuse, note that this is a naive answer to a crude question. I’m am well aware that religion is not the only reason groups of humans war against each one another but if religion didn't exist, the nations of the world might be more inclined to settle their differences diplomatically and the need for soldiers might be vastly reduced.
As far as honoring the service members who have who have been sacrificed in the name of "protecting our freedom", I think she has done the loved ones of those who lived as atheists and non-Christians a tremendous disservice.
What do you think?
Hat tip to Dana H. and Robyn W. for the video.
Crossposted on tumblr.

Unpopular Opinions
Hey, I've got a few days free at the tag end of my trip to Ireland and the UK. Would it be a good idea to pop in to visit the Cheltenham Science Festival? Is it easy to get to, and once I get there, will it be easy and reasonable to get lodging for a night? I'd love to see Robin Ince's Infinite Monkey Cage in particular, but I'd be unhappy to make the trip and then discover I need to book a month in advance and that my only choice is to sleep on a parkbench.
Read the comments on this post...I agree with the spirit and intent of the campaign, and I understand why there is a need for it. I read a comment the other day that went something along the lines of, “Of course these old faggots like Dan Savage want young fags not to kill themselves. Who else if he going to fuck?” Sentiments like this are disturbingly common, and they stem from an overall attitude of hostility for homosexuality. This is basically why the gay rights movement exists.
I will try to tread lightly as I provide a little criticism of the “It Gets Better Project.”
And there needs to be criticism, because it’s not exactly the most well thought out campaign. For one thing, it’s based on a lie. I have talked to many gay people who are well past high school, and trust me: it gets worse.
Gay kids in high school don’t have to worry about losing their job and not making the mortgage because they got fired from their job for their sexual orientation. Gay kids aren’t generally at the age when gay marriage bans directly affect their lives. And it’s generally not gay high schoolers who are beaten and dragged behind pick-up trucks.
It just doesn’t get better by magic. The status quo is such that it does not get better just because you get past high school.

To me, the message needs to be: only you can make it better. There needs to be change enacted for it to ever get any better, not only when it comes to gay rights, but anything. Time does not improve the world naturally. Progress is not measured with a watch or a calendar, but in the decibel level of your voice. If you don’t speak out for change and publicly push for it, it ain’t gonna happen.
Which leads me to another criticism… I won’t name the kid, but this whole movement was because some gay guy jumped off a bridge when his roommate set up a webcam and broadcast some gay sexin’. This whole situation pissed me off, and not for any of the reasons given in the public debate.
For one thing, all the blame fell on the roommate with the webcam set up. Newsflash: it was the roommate’s room, too. It’s not like someone snuck into the kid’s room, invaded his personal space, installed a covert camera, and then broadcast it. It was his room, and he was kicked out by this guy who wanted to have sex with another guy.
As someone who lived in college dorms, I sympathize far more with the guy who was kicked out. I always made sure to schedule my sexual escapades around my roommate, and my roommate did the same. I always felt bad for (and gave a place to hang out and watch TV to) anyone who was in the situation of the “locked out” roommate.
So already I hate this kid for locking out his roommate. Strike one. Then, he goes and jumps off a bridge like a drama queen because people found out he was gay. Strike two. Then this kid’s family prosecuted (successfully) the roommate for doing nothing more than videotaping his own room. If it had been a security camera instead of a webcam, no one would have questioned it. Since it’s a “webcam” and the kid killed himself and was gay… that roommate is a monster.
Strike three, you’re out. Good riddance, I don’t miss you. I’m glad you did it, and I wish more people like you would jump off bridges. I hope the family dies in a firey car crash and that all vestiges of any DNA you had is wiped from the gene pool.
Why so much hostility? Well for one thing, it gives gay rights a bad name to attach itself to this incident. It’s a tacit admission that, “Hey, we idolize a guy who thought being gay was so awful that having other people know you’re gay is worth killing yourself over.” What the fuck kind of message is that? We shouldn’t be putting people on a pedestal for killing themselves after being outed. How does that make any sense?
Dan Savage is an icon of the gay culture, not a douche who took a flying leap off the George Washington when his homosexuality was made public. If Dan Savage wasn’t in some way associated with this whole “It Gets Better” thing, I would say it was hopeless. But Dan Savage can publicly say, “I’m gay,” and not want to die, and he fights tooth and nail for gay rights.
That is how it will get better, from gay activists who actually care about the gay community and who work to make it better for all, not from self-loathing cowards who aren’t worthy of even having me write their names. We should forget those types of people, the kind who run from their problems, the kind who give up, the quitters. They aren’t even worth a memory.
That is what we should be telling people. We should remind them that if you take the lazy way out, if you are too afraid to confront difficulty, we won’t honor you with anything, and we won’t even bother to remember you. I guarantee you that if that idea crosses the mind of someone looking over the ledge, it’s a whole lot more likely that they won’t jump than if they’re thinking, “I’ll be a hero for this…”




Planet Atheism buttons
FAQ (includes joining info)
RSS feed
Email subscription

