Monthly Archive for March, 2009

The Guardian: Superstitious wingnuts reject superstitious wingnuttery

Today’s The Guardian reports that the hand-waving catholic church in the USA has banned the hand-waving that is reiki treatment in its institutions, describing it as unscientific and inappropriate.

Guidelines issued by the committee on doctrine at the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops warn healthcare workers and chaplains that the therapy “lacks scientific credibility” and could expose people to “malevolent forces”.

The document also claims that for a Catholic to believe in reiki presents “insurmountable problems”.

Reiki means “universal life energy” and was developed by the theology professor Dr Mikao Usui at the turn of the 20th century, from Buddhist beliefs and Sanskrit teachings. The client lies on a couch, clothed and relaxing, while the therapist’s hands rest lightly on the body in a special sequence. Clients often report heat and tingling sensations.

The money quote (with my emphasis) goes as follows:

The church’s guidelines state: “A Catholic who puts his or her trust in reiki would be operating in the realm of superstition, the no man’s land that is neither faith nor science. Superstition corrupts one’s worship of God by turning one’s religious feeling and practice in a false direction.”

The intellectual compartmentalisation at work here is, to me, astounding. Then again, hypocrisy is not something lacking in the catholic church.

The Guardian: Catholic bishops in US ban Japanese reiki

Possibly related posts:

  1. The Guardian: Christians respond to the ‘atheist bus’ Three separate christian groups have responded to the British Humanist...
  2. The Guardian: If… – ‘My chin is lookin’ kinda long’ Steve Bell’s If… cartoon strip in The Guardian today had...
  3. Tony Blair on dogma When talking about how he can consider himself a catholic...

Pascal’s Wager

I remember coming up with Pascal's Wager when I was in my twenties, even though I'd never realized that Pascal thought it up first!

At the time, I couldn't think of an adequate response to it. Fortunately, I learned. Here's my favourite refutations of the Wager:

1. Bertrand Russell response - "But Sir, you didn't give us enough evidence!"

2. The "Which God?" response - Pascal was assuming Yahweh in his argument. But, if god is really, ummmm, Thor, then Pascal's bet fails no matter what you bet on. If you choose to believe in Yahweh, or not, you still lose and go to Thor's hell.

3. The "Worst God!" response - It's better to believe in the god with the worst Hell since the Hell of all other gods will be less severe. Paradoxically, this means believing in a god that is able to dream up the most Evil Hell - not a trait I would want in a 'loving' god.

4. The "Atheist Heaven" response - If I discover, after death, that god exists and it asks why I never believed, I would explain that my logic and reasoning abilities must have come from god and I must have been expected to use them. Using them to the full extent possible showed that god must be improbable. Wouldn't god make heaven available to those who used all the abilities that god gave us and decided god wasn't there? Heaven must be for atheists!

Anyone have any more? Anyone? Anyone?

Photoshop Phantasies Series – Part Two

Fortune.jpg
FortuneOrig.jpg
GiveWay.jpg
GiveWayOrig.jpg
GlobalChillage.jpg
GlobalChillageOrig.jpg
Iron.jpg
IronOrig.jpg
JigsawPuzzle.jpg
JigsawPuzzleOrig.jpg
LaufWerk.jpg
LaufWerkOrig.jpg
LightCross.jpg
LightCrossOrig.jpg
LoveInTheAir.jpg
LoveInTheAirOrig.jpg
NewCulture.jpg
NewCultureOrig.jpg
Passion.jpg
PassionOrig.jpg

Wives, submit yourselves unto your husbands

I don't understand how any modern woman can buy into the teachings of the . It's so obvious, the book was written by men; specifically men who believed that women were inferior. And I'm not even talking about the here. This one is from Ephesians:

5:22 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.
5:23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.
5:24 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.

Yeah, I know it goes on to say that men should love their wives even as Christ loved the church, but love is not equality. You can love your pet or your big screen TV, but you don't think of them as equals.

Here are a few more from the :
1 Corinthians 11:3
But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.
1 Corinthians 14:34-36
Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.
Colossians 3:18
Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as it is fit in the Lord.
1 Timothy 2:11-15
Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing.
1 Peter 3:1
Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands.

(See The Skeptic's Annotated Bible for more examples)

Space Moose presents: How to Blaspheme

Space Moose presents: How to Blaspheme

Loved the one about coveting your neighbor’s ass. :)

For more about Space Moose, see Wikipedia.


Copyright © 2010 Way of the Mind

The Hate Syndrome

Hatred is many things. But in very general terms it is attention targeted at an idea, an objet or person, with intent to do damage. The foundation of which is usually pain, past or current. Hate features ignorance of all other angle on or concern about its target. It fuels focused imagination and eventually actions to resolve itself.



The picture above was taken in Montreal, Quebec, a few weeks ago during an annual yet impromptu march against police violence. Hatred is often but not always mutual. And it is sometimes caused not by directly by pain, where the object of hate is unrelated to its subject, as in the case of acute mental illness. Or when hatred is directed towards a symbol, an image that incorporates what the subject feels. To hate is to feel intense dislike, or extreme aversion or hostility, always with a reason. Hatred is not evil, it is a syndrome of many emotions, attitudes, views, intentions, and it burns everything it touches. Hatred is animal.

YouTube is a Goldmine!

If you are looking for faulty English.

"Religious beliefs were probarly created by uncertainity, which after each retelling of the stories of it slowly vanished.

People were acceptable to the claims of it because of the vunrability of the child brain."

The poor English is rather amusing. I am so glad that the claims found people acceptable. I stayed quiet about this find because the writer is Danish, and I would not even attempt to express such a complex thought in Danish.

Don’t scoff, I have seen equally poor English from Americans.

I'd agree that uncertainties prompted the invention of religions. However, religious institutions rely upon instilling even greater fears than they help, or profess to help fears that they deliberately instilled. I know that these sound like the same thing, but they are not.

The first is, "Don't be afraid, God loves you."
The second is, "Don't be afraid of God's threatened punishments for your sins because God will love you if you worship him." That is, thou must love and obey He who threatens punishment. Negatively parental, isn't it?

The persistent vulnerability of childish brains in adults who have not outgrown fears permits institutions that sell idiotic notions in order to prosper.

Humanist Communities

There has been some recent discussion in the media and in the blogosphere about building Humanist communities, and I'd like to indicate my support for the idea and explain some of my thoughts.

The first question commonly asked is why Humanists don't just join a group of Unitarian Universalists. Some certainly do. As for me, though I have a positive opinion of UUs, I really prefer a group of people who generally share my beliefs, not simply a group of people who welcome me regardless of my beliefs. UUs emphasize love, peace and acceptance of all people, but not necessarily the critical thinking and intellectual rigor that I personally value so strongly. They use religious language and rituals in a non-dogmatic manner and they fully welcome atheists, but I much prefer to jettison anything from religion that suggests superstition and retain only the most humanistic elements of religious practice relating to the promotion of virtue and building of communities. These include such things as a recognizable name and symbol, meetings at least once per week, discussions of various topics, social activities, and small group interaction.

Here in Jacksonville, we have the First Coast Freethought Society, but I've only attended a couple of meetings. They only meet once a month on Monday nights, and the group consists almost entirely of senior citizens. I'm less than halfway to being a senior citizen and my wife is less than a third of the way there, so I have a more difficult time making social connections in such a group. There is also an atheist Meet-Up group with plenty of young members, and I've attended a number of their meetings, but the focus is almost exclusively on views of religion. Now I enjoy the criticism of religion more than almost anyone except perhaps some other bloggers, but sometimes I want to move beyond the inherent negativity in criticism and on to something more positive.

Since I've gotten married, my desire for such a community has noticeably weakened. An important part of that desire was to meet a young woman who shares my worldview, and now I have exactly that. I'm also much busier than previously with a wife and law school, so my life is rather full and I'd encounter difficulty in finding time to attend any meetings. I've already had to go on hiatus from improv comedy for several months, and if I find any extra time, it will be spent pursuing that first. If something new arises in the area, however, I hope to lend it whatever support I can manage.

Nothing New Under the Sun

I've grown weary of discussing the statements and actions of religionists in this blog. A couple of years ago I adopted a policy of monitoring the opinion section of my local newspaper in order to provide a source of regular material to address. Since then, I've written dozens of blog entries about perhaps a hundred letters and editorials. Although I've found a brand-new local violation of church-state separation, I've chosen to ignore it and to officially revoke the policy altogether. Believers have nothing new to say, and I have nothing new to say in response. It's the same idiocy over and over again. The average person in the area can't reason their way out of a wet paper bag, and I'm tired of arguing with a brick wall. This is not at all to say that I won't discuss the stupidity of religion, just that I won't feel obligated to myself to mention every example of stupidity that finds its way into the pages of the local newspaper.

Prayer Is Superstition




A prayer has the same effect as a lucky horseshoe. Statistically none. No effect whatsoever. It does however stimulate the imagination into creating excuses when a demonstration of the effect of prayers (or horseshoes) fails miserably.

The above video is somewhat "not exciting" to watch but it's arguments are rock solid.

Incognito Series

ToucanPlay.jpg
BettyBubbleFishcopy.jpg
FlyInTheOintmentaicopy.jpg
CliveTheCourtJestercopy.jpg
DancingWithDemonscopym111copy.jpg
DuckHuntingcopy.jpg
HotDogSchnozorigcopy.jpg
JustDuckycopy.jpg
SticksAndStigmatas.jpg
KabukiKarmaOrigLine.jpg
KabukiKarmaTwist.jpg
KabukiKarmaInGreen.jpg
KabukiKarmaInLavender.jpg
KabukiKarmaInOrange.jpg
KabukiKarmaInTan.jpg
DancingWithDemonscopym1.jpg
HotDogSchnozFOTF.jpg
HotDogSchnozReflection.jpg
HotDogSchnozInPurple.jpg
HotDogSchnozOnGreen.jpg

Ominous Voice mimics Creepy Voice

I have not checked to see whether this has already been posted elsewhere. Excuse me if I have duplicated it.

Anyway, for any of you who have had the misfortune of watching a video by a soporific* YECer who calls himself NephilimFree, then this video should amuse you. It is a brilliant take-off and the double entendres at the end are hilarious. It opens with something that the “Creepy Cretinous Creationist” actually said.



* I'm serious, if it were not that his videos would give me nightmares, Nephy would be perfect for curing insomnia.

Terminal session

Hmm… I wonder if this is how it goes over in the “labs” at the Discovery Institute

Last login: Sat Mar 28 15:56:35 on ttyp1
Welcome to Ubuntu Christian Edition!
Jesus loves you, billd!
:~ billd$ cd ID/
:~/ID billd$ ls
idweasel
:~/ID billd$ ls -a
.
..
.holybible.tex
idweasel
:~/ID billd$ ./idweasel ----help
idweasel, version 2.0

usage: idweasel [-sV] [-d godmodule]

 s : show program source
 V : show verbose output

 d godmodule : design with selected god module
:~/ID billd$ ./idweasel > output.txt
:~/ID billd$ ls
idweasel
output.txt
:~/ID billd$ cat output.txt
METHINKS IT IS LIKE A WEASEL
:~/ID billd$ ./idweasel -d Jesus > output2.txt
:~/ID billd$ ls
idweasel
output.txt
output2.txt
:~/ID billd$ cat output2.txt
I AM THE WAY, THE TRUTH, AND THE LIFE
:~/ID billd$ ./idweasel -V -d Jesus > output3.txt
:~/ID billd$ ls
idweasel
output.txt
output2.txt
output3.txt
:~/ID billd$ cat output3.txt
 Output: I AM THE WAY, THE TRUTH, AND THE LIFE
 Notice: Thou shalt have no other programs before Me.
  Dogma: Do you think string concatenation just happens by CHANCE?
Warning: Evilution suxxors!
:~/ID billd$ cat Jesus
cat: Jesus: No such file or directory
:~/ID billd$ # :-(
:~/ID billd$ whereis Jesus
:~/ID billd$ # :'-(
:~/ID billd$ ./idweasel --version
idweasel v2.0 (Post-deluvian)
(c)4004BC cdesign proponentists

This program is not IN ANY WAY AT ALL based on that heathen
Richard Dawkin's original 'weasel' program.  So there!
:~/ID billd$ ./idweasel --source
Error: source code not available.  This program is
irreducibly complex.
:~/ID billd$ cat ./idweasel
#!/usr/bin/magic
:~/ID billd$ echo ./idweasel -d FSM
YARR! HERE BE STRIPPERS AND BEER FOUNTAINS!
:~/ID billd$ # fuck!
:~/ID billd$ exit
logout
[Process completed]

Possibly related posts:

  1. It’s called “Evolution”? Urgh! I was listening to the most recent podcast from The...
  2. Pedro deals with the “one in a million” fallacy Pedro over at Way Of The Mind has recently posted...

Dazzled In Denver Series

DenverAtSunsetII.jpg
DenverAtSunsetIII.jpg
DenverAtSunsetIV.jpg
DenverAtDuskII.jpg
DenverAtDuskIII.jpg
DenverAtDuskIV.jpg
DenverAtDuskV.jpg
DenverAtDuskVI.jpg
DenverAtDark.jpg
UnionSquareII.jpg
UnionSquareIII.jpg
UnionSquareAtDark.jpg
UnionSquareAtDarkII.jpg
AbstractDenver.jpg
AbstractDenverInPurple.jpg

Who You Gonna Call?

Photobucket

Tom Green rages at idiots on Fox News’ Red Eye

The video of the dopes on Faux Noise’s 3 AM program Red Eye ripping on Canada and Canadian troops in Afghanistan as certainly made its rounds on the net as of late. Here it is incase you haven’t seen it.

It has annoyed and angered quite a few people, to say the least. I would describe my reaction as mildly annoyed. I just don’t view these people as credible, and so their idiotic views hardly phased me. A few months ago, I would’ve been more annoyed. But now it’s becoming increasingly clear that the target market of this network – right wing lunatics and ignoramuses – are moving further and further into marginalization.

Tom Green, on the other hand, was absolutely enraged. I pass the video on because it’s important to support those in the public eye who speak out against this horrible network. While it’s true that corruption in news media spreads across the television dial, Fox News is in a league of its own. The bar was already so low, so the people at Fox News routinely take to digging.


Proven in Court: Prayer Kills

From Reuters:

PALERMO (Reuters) - A Tunisian pilot who paused to pray instead of taking emergency measures before crash-landing his plane, killing 16 people, has been sentenced to 10 years in jail by an Italian court along with his co-pilot.

The 2005 crash at sea off Sicily left survivors swimming for their lives, some clinging to a piece of the fuselage that remained floating after the ATR turbo-prop aircraft splintered upon impact.

A fuel-gauge malfunction was partly to blame but prosecutors also said the pilot succumbed to panic, praying out loud instead of following emergency procedures and then opting to crash-land the plane instead trying to reach a nearby airport.

Another five employees of Tuninter, a subsidiary of Tunisair, were sentenced to between eight and nine years in jail by the court, in a verdict handed down Monday.

The seven accused, who were not in court, will not spend time in jail until the appeals process has been exhausted.

(Writing by Phil Stewart)


So now it is proven in a court of law that prayer is counterproductive, worthless, and deadly.

Word of the day: qu’randemonium

From the same people that brought us pearl clutchers and koranimals, I present to you:

qu’randemonium

The chaos that inevitably ensues when readers of Mad Mo’s Book of Nonsense try to follow, or impose, their own rules.

Whether they’re running their own country or trying to ruin someone else’s, it’ll end in qu’randemonium.

/hattip: remigius

Possibly related posts:

  1. WSJ: Islam Needs to Prove It’s a Religion of Peace When the British government banned Geert Wilders from entering the...