Archive for April, 2008

For the Last Time…


An otherwise good (for us, bad for Stein) review spoiled by this paragraph.

Unlike Moore, Stein doesn’t resort to (many) cheap shots. He gives the opposition - stoutly represented by “The God Delusion” author Richard Dawkins - ample opportunity to make its case. In getting Dawkins to concede that there might be some intelligent source to life, Stein scores big.

I had to go outside and scream, as a cloud of birds shot upwards at the wretched noise I made.

Stein asked Dawkins to imagine how Intelligent Design could be possible. Dawkins fell into the dishonestly set up trap and gave panspermia as an example. As I have said before, Dawkins does not believe in panspermia (see River Out of Eden, The Ancestor’s Tale, and his Royal Institution lectures), but believes that it’s possible. The reason why it’s more possible than the Judeo-Christian god is because the aliens would have to have come about through natural causes.

OK, so panspermia would make an intelligent source of life possible, but it’s not nearly as foolish as Intelligent Design really is.

Everybody knows that Intelligent Design is just another faux name for creationism. Anybody who denies that can take a good look at my transitional fossil…

cdesign proponentsists

The Intelligent Design being pushed for in our schools and science is about the Judeo-Christian god creating life. Not a scientific theory that would be supported by panspermia.

The only reason why otherwise intelligent people are crediting Stein with scoring big is he’s actually managed to make good propaganda by making a fabrication shortly afterward saying “What? Richard Dawkins thinks that Intelligent Design is a valid scientific possibility?”

No, you pig-faced dumb ass. Richard Dawkins thinks that panspermia is a valid (questionably) scientific possibility since it does not ultimately postulate supernatural sky fairies. However, Occam’s razor applies to it only a little less than it applies to your fairy tale. Go back to selling eye drops, and stop demonstrating your foolish ignorance of science.

ADL makes an official statement

After all the pious nonsense from certain quarters blaming scientists for the Holocaust and other atrocities, it seems appropriate to take note of the Anti-Defamation League's response:

The film Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed misappropriates the Holocaust and its imagery as a part of its political effort to discredit the scientific community which rejects so-called intelligent design theory.

Hitler did not need Darwin to devise his heinous plan to exterminate the Jewish people and Darwin and evolutionary theory cannot explain Hitler's genocidal madness.

Using the Holocaust in order to tarnish those who promote the theory of evolution is outrageous and trivializes the complex factors that led to the mass extermination of European Jewry.

Poor Ben Stein, rebuked. Oh, well, he'll recover … he'll just notice that there are a heck of a lot of Jews in academia, and they're in on the whole 'Darwinist" conspiracy.

Read the comments on this post...

Argument From Ignorance

Here's another little snippet I've been saving. It's a piece from the BBC discussing the ongoing saga of the Embryo Research Bill currently going through parliament. Here we have a representative of the British Humanist Society and a representative of the Society for the Protection of the Unborn Child discussing the issues:



Does anyone else find it amazing that the religious nutter from SPUC appears to have absolutely no idea about the subject he is supposed to be discussing?

Why the fuck are we still giving these idiots the time of day?

Haha, Stein. Haha.


If Stein was hoping for a sympathetic audience for his film, you’d expect it to be an evangelical Christian, right?

Well, not s’much.

My friend, Created Rationalist, has posted his review of the film after his church was invited to see Expelled. It’s not very favourable. He deals at a much greater length with all the cases Stein attempted to present in the film than I did.

But some of those atheist and science bloggers are mean!

Well… yes… Yes I am. How exactly am I supposed to feel about being equated to a Nazi?

Now, unfortunately, there are a few things I must take issue with.

I agree;
–that there is some evidence one way or another of Intelligent Agency in the universe
–that the scientists don’t always do a very good job at explaining how they think life began through natural causes
–that Atheism and Philosophical Naturalism are inherently metaphysical and unprovable
–that many atheists are incorrectly equating atheism with science and trying to create a flase dichotomy of sorts
– that there is an active movement among atheists to devalue religion.
–that science (Evolution in particular) can be used to rationalize evil deeds such as killing off the weak

I suppose that evolution does not disprove god (the deist god), though I would have to say that it does contradict the Judo-Christian god who is supposedly playing an active role in the creation of life on Earth.

For example, if I were guiding evolution along, with the intent of making man in my own image, I would have avoided completely unnecessary evolutionary off-shoots such as dinosaurs. It was only after the dinosaurs had gone extinct that the age of mammals occurred, eventually leading to us. But it took another… oh… about 200 million years before this could happen.

Now, it is true that we’re not sure exactly how life happened, but we have a few equally plausible theories of how it could have started. Essentially, all you need is carbon, nitrogen, hydrogen, and oxygen to create organic molecules, and then you need a self-replicating molecule for selection pressure to take place. The main scientific controversies over the origin of life have to do with whether DNA or RNA came first, or if it started in the primordial soup or elsewhere (like around hydrothermal vents).

Contrary to what Ben Stein would have you believe, most scientists do not really believe in panspermia, though it certainly is the most plausible way in which you could stretch ID to be true. For the most part, all scientific theories of the origin of life are plausible and do not need to postulate supernatural jazz.

Now, as for saying that Atheism and naturalism are supernatural and unprovable… Well, you’re calling naturalism supernatural. You can’t get much of a better oxymoron than supernatural naturalism. Naturalism is based on what is observable and empirically testable. Supernaturalism is based on faith. Very different.

I suppose that you can do science and still be a religious person (Francis Crick, Newton, Kenneth Miller), but you’d definitely have to compartmentalize your brain severely. I don’t really buy into the whole NOMA, or “ways of knowing” relativist stuff. You can seek truth, or you can compartmentalize and only partly seek truth.

Alright, you got me. I’m trying to devalue religion. I was an in-the-closet devaluer of religion and now I’m out.

OK, fine. I am actively trying to devalue religion. What’s wrong with that?

And as for saying that science (evolution in particular) can be used to justify evil though it does no necessarily lead to Nazism…

Evolution by natural selection was not a necessity for eugenics. If you think about it, we had eugenics around for thousands of years before Darwin had the brilliance to think of nature as doing the selection. Darwin did not come up with selection. He came up with selection by nature, which is very different from a human selecting traits that he/she likes.

Before natural selection, we were breeding pigeons, dogs, cabbages for traits that we liked. This was artificial selection, the real necessary component to eugenics.

Hitler, though he tried to make it seem like science justified him, was scientifically ignorant about some things.

For one thing, he was a racist. There is no science supporting racism. Also, based on what I read from Mein Kampf, he seemed to think that being in different races was almost equivalent to being in different species. He begins his chapter on nation and race by talking about how animals in different species can’t mate with animals in different species… and applies that to people in different races, saying that hybrids are inferior.

Being half-Chinese and half-American, I took offence to that. I take offence to anybody who says that Hitler was justifying his madness with science as that would be saying the thing that I love most passionately justifies saying I’m inferior.

I think we should make a clear distinction between Hitler’s motivations and his justifications. Hitler’s motivation was a pathological hate for Jews. His justifications were that he was “breeding a super-human race”. Whether he actually thought he could do that, I don’t know, but it’s clear that he would want to kill Jews anyway. If he hadn’t been aware of the idea of eugenics, he might have justified the holocaust by saying that the Jews deserved to die because they were ruining the economy or something.

That said, I’m glad that the Created Rationalist has enough critical thinking capabilities to see through most of Stein’s lies. Give it some time, and you’ll have both feet in the world of reason.

Happy Birthday, World Wide Web

It’s the 15th birthday of the release of the source code for the World Wide Web, according to the BBC.

Just 15 years. And it’s already almost impossible to remember how we lived before tinterweb.

The first ever web site was http://info.cern.ch. It’s still there (the site not the same web page…) It is pretty rubbish, which is oddly comforting. (No reasonable menu, you can only find the other pages by going to the sitemap, elements don’t fit exactly, in IE6, and they use style attributes in tags instead of the class definition -) ) There’s some screenshots of Tim Berners-Lee’s first browsers, which could give present-day browsers some serious competition.

It links to CERN’s proper site which is brilliant, although most of it is so far over my head that i might as well be reading an umbrella.

The web itself has become indispensable. Especially for finding out anything you want to know - instantly. It’s true that much of what you get is spurious, but the more of us that develop a built-in bullshit detector the better.

And mostly, it’s great that the web has grown so fast precisely because it was designed to be free and open and collaborative The BBC reported Robert Cailliau:

“We had toyed with the idea of asking for some sort of royalty. But Tim wasn’t very much in favour of that.” ………
“If we had put a price on it like the University of Minnesota had done with Gopher then it would not have expanded into what it is now.

(Maybe someone should tell the DRM fanatics.)

SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "Happy Birthday, World Wide Web", url: "http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2008/04/30/happy-birthday-world-wide-web/" });

Pat Condell DVD released

pat condell dvdInternet atheist firebrand Pat Condell has had 35 of his YouTube rants collected, re-mastered, and packaged into one DVD. As The Freethinker first revealed in its February interview with Pat, the DVD is produced by RichardDawkins.net.

The 35 videos, plus an exclusive introduction by the man himself, add up to three hours of hard-hitting, no-punches-pulled irreligious wit. A snip at $15 - and all for a good cause!

Buy it here.

Fuck Yo Captcha!

Ok I'm getting sick and tired of the fucked up Captcha on blogger. Hey I write a quick little post now lets publish, ok well i doesn't matter what I type the first time because it fails the first time no matter what, been that way for a while now. So I try it again, I can barely decipher what it says because unlike some other's that use multiple colors and slashes to confuse computers but help people, google had the bright idea, how about we just squish the fucking letters together so close that no one real or not has more than a wild ass guess as to what the squiggles are. Great fucking plan. then I tried again. And again. Then I got more pissed, then I tried again. I think it was somewhere around the 6th attempt before I happened to get lucky. I wonder how many tries this one will take, I also wonder if it might not be worth moving to a new domain?

Another expulsion vindicated

Last December, I mentioned the case of a creationist named Nathaniel Abraham who was fired from his job at Woods Hole — he had the gall to apply for a post-doctoral position in an evolution and development lab, and the PI dismissed him for being incapable of supporting the full range of "evolutionary implications and interpretations" of the work he would have to do. Abraham sued him for a half million dollars in reply.

The judge's decision has been delivered.

A Massachusetts federal court judge last week (April 22) dismissed the case against a researcher at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution who allegedly fired a postdoc in his lab because of the postdoc's creationist beliefs.

The postdoc, Nathaniel Abraham, was dismissed from his position in the lab of molecular toxicologist Mark Hahn in November, 2004, after revealing that he believed in the literal truth of the Bible and considered evolution to be not a fact but a theory. Hahn's lab studies the evolution of molecular mechanisms of chemical signaling and adaptation to chemical exposure.

Abraham filed a discrimination complaint against Hahn, which was rejected by the Massachusetts Commission against Discrimination. He then filed suit against Mark Hahn and the institute last November, arguing, according to court documents, that he had been hired to work in Hahn's lab because of his expertise in zebrafish developmental biology, toxicology, and programmed cell death, and that "acceptance of evolution as scientific fact rather than theory (in contravention of his sincerely held religious beliefs) was in no way a bona fide occupational qualification of employment."

The defendants, however, argued that Abraham did not file the lawsuit within the timeframe specified by law. Furthermore, the court documents stated, research in Hahn's lab "would have involved application of evolutionary principles without qualifications concerning the acceptance of evolution."

Good work!

Read the comments on this post...

The Daily Show: Abstinence - The Global War In Your Pants

In the following video, Jon Stewart tackles the question of abstinence-only sex education (with all of the appropriate sarcasm) and the fact that it has proven ineffective in reducing teen pregnancies and the transmission of STD's.

He first offers us a look at some of the techniques used and some of the arguments being offered by those opposed to comprehensive sex education. You're bound to love the dirty toothbrush example as well as the "god stick and shame cave" analogy that Stewart attributes to the likes of Senator Brownback. It's a good thing we've advanced from more primitive deterrent strategies and adopted these advanced measures of preventing children from exploring their sexuality.

He closes the segment with a pubic service announcement promoting dry humping as a reasonable alternative to getting 'dirty'. Stewart tells teens that dry humping is safe...it avoids the need for those disgusting condoms...and it allows you to still get into heaven.

Thanks Pops! - Great Quote

My parents are renovating a building so I've been doing some work with them last couple evenings after regular work. It's been fun to get to just talk about stuff, just the two of us. Sure we just got back from a vacation together but there were always others around and I kinda tried to avoid politics with that crew. Of course it was the week of the PA primaries and I'd just gone to see Obama speak, oh shit I never mentioned that did I? Anyway politics came up after considerable drinking which isn't always the best plan, but it sure wasn't going to stop me. Parts of it got quite heated, but I was just getting pissed off because one guy kept saying that he hated my boy Eric Massa because he was just a full time politician..... For the non-locals, Massa is a 27 (?) year naval vet who held some pretty lofty posts under Gen. Wes Clark but has never held a political office. Yes he's been campaigning against the incumbent who actually has been a politician most if not all of his adult life but somehow none of that was relevant because Massa is a full time politician, end of discussion. Whatever fucktard. So while I wouldn't call my father a liberal I do consider him a very logical and rational person which means many of his views are fairly liberal, with a bit of a libertarian lean. But when in a group of decidedly conservatives, he'd rather just have a good time, he is on vacation at the time. Me on the other hand, my politics don't take a rest, especially not just cause I'm drunk. What I'm trying to say is that the last couple days we've had some interesting convo's. I try not to dwell on the heavy stuff for too long but some shit just needs to be said.

Now for the story about the quote, some ad came on for Larry the Cable Guy, and so I told my dad, "It's kinda funny of all the different groups of people, the only one that consistently makes me feel awkward and uncomfortable is rednecks." "Maybe that because they seem to be about one breath away from being skinheads" my dad fires back with no hesitation. Well done dad, well done.

Friendly Atheist Contest #25: Misspelled Faith Posters

Last week, I ran this contest:

Create a poster/saying about atheism or faith that becomes humorous with a *slight* change in spelling.

Here are the Top 10 responses (with submitters)!

10|

godhatesfigs.jpg

(Kira C.)

9|

at-heist.jpg

(hoverFrog)

8|

savour.jpg

(Ashes)

7|

ant-christ.jpg

(hoverFrog)

6|

dilution.jpg

(miller)

5|

christinanity.jpg

(Ubi Dubium)

4|

exceptgod.jpg

(Richard Wade)

3|

letter-day.jpg

(Laurie Soule)

2|

blond-faith.jpg

(Ubi Dubium)

1|

croationism.jpg

(Citizen Steve)

Congratulations to the winners! The top three will be receiving specially-made Friendly Atheist wristbands (in the color of their choice), sent to me by blog reader Shauna and her sister Danni!

FriendlyAtheistBand

If you’d like to win your own wristband, here is the new contest (courtesy of Citizen Steve):

What will be the title of Ben Stein’s next film?

Funny and creative answers will have a shot at winning.

Good luck!


Technorati Tags: , ,

Share This

Cat Fight!


Hillary Clinton (hateful) and Bill O’Reilly (equally hateful) are going head-to-head on The O’Reilly Factor tonight.

I'm a Moderate

I am politically in the middle on most subjects.  I don’t pick sides in political battles because both sides are usually stupid and wrong.  Being in the middle, I can safely say that I hate Hillary Clinton as much as I hate Bill O’Reilly.  They are both equally, although in different ways, polititarded.

I will, however, TiVo this battle royale.  It will be great fun later with a bottle of good gettin’-trashed-liquor and a bowl of popcorn.

Sarcasm: The Onion & Seinfeld’s “You’re So Good Looking”

In the following video, The Onion reports that the vast majority of praise (compliments) is not sincere and is actually offered with sarcasm.

It reminded me of a Seinfeld episode titled The Good Samaritan. In the episode, George jumps the gun on acknowledging the sneeze of a woman in the presence of her husband. The husband is angered because George didn't allow enough time for the husband to issue the first "God bless you".

As the show progresses, the Seinfeld crew continues to debate George's alleged faux pas. During the discussion, Jerry decides that telling someone "God bless you" after they sneeze isn't really all that meaningful. Instead, Jerry suggests it would make people feel better if we said, "You're so good looking".

Since virtually everything on Seinfeld had to do with sarcasm, it seemed to perfectly complement the tongue-in-cheek satire offered by The Onion. With that said, next time you hear someone sneeze, give Jerry's suggestion a go and see if you get a thank you or a glare that tells you your smart ass sarcasm isn't appreciated.

Putting Another Myth To Rest

A common accusation from creationists is essentially that Darwin caused the Holocaust. The “logic” behind this is that the theory of evolution leads inexorably to ideas of racial superiority (never mind centuries of anti-Semitism before Darwin was even born) and concepts like eugenics. Forget about all those devout Christians who manned the concentration camps - it’s a scientific idea about environmental adaptation that’s to blame!

Well, when the families and descendants of the people the holocaust actually happened to have heard so much of that sort of nonsense that they openly decry your efforts to smear science, you should be smart enough to know it’s time to retire your rant and find a better argument.

In response to the travesty that is Expelled: No Intelligence Applied, the Anti-Defamation League had this to say:

The film Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed misappropriates the Holocaust and its imagery as a part of its political effort to discredit the scientific community which rejects so-called intelligent design theory.

Hitler did not need Darwin to devise his heinous plan to exterminate the Jewish people and Darwin and evolutionary theory cannot explain Hitler’s genocidal madness.

Using the Holocaust in order to tarnish those who promote the theory of evolution is outrageous and trivializes the complex factors that led to the mass extermination of European Jewry.

So as far as I’m concerned it’s official: your “Darwin equals Hitler” proclamations need to go away. Go focus on supporting arguments for all those other delusions you cling to despite massive evidence to the contrary.

It’s wishful thinking, I know - but a guy can dream, can’t he?

Inconsiderate bastards

Ok this minor little story came from a while ago but I need to point it out anyway. I'm at the laundromat havin' a good ol' time watching some daily show goodness and Colbert is up next. I had to throw stuff in the drier and at about that point a couple other people walk in. One says something about how long its going to take and then the other says well if were going to be here then we might as well be entertained and changes the channel. Now ever other time I've seen people come into the place when others were there and try to change the channel they started by asking, hey are you watching this? I've been asked that while reading a book with the tv volume almost off, but thats what polite people do. These assholes couldn't have cared less that someone else was there first. Then to add insult to injury what did they make me miss the finest satire on TV for? America's Next Top Model. Grrrr......
So what does one do in this situation? I could have said, Excuse me I was watching that. I could have simply changed it back. I could have gone to the other side of the place and read the book I had brought, I went a different route. Get them back without doing a thing. There are three chairs near the TV, and a couple more on the far side, I simply sat back down where I had been put my headphones in and read my book while sitting in the middle chair of the three under the TV. They kept me from watching my show, I kept them from watching theres, and I had my own entertainment anyway. I should have just changed it back but I'm too passive. Oh well.

Oh and fuck them bitches.

Then today I'm driving, I head onto the highway and theres a little construction going on and theres just one travel lane and a stop at the merge. No big deal its not that terribly busy a highway. Wait till there a good size gap and don't be stingy with thee throttle when you hop into the travel lane, simple right? The other option that I hadn't thought of but apparently several people ahead of me did was to stop at the sign the slowly pull out right in front of a car traveling at 60+ mph forcing them to brake rapidly to avoid a collision, my personal fav being the city buss that pulled out in front of the tractor trailer, great plan asshole. I was impressed there wasn't a crash, well done mr. (or mrs.) trucker.

I had another uber-asshole move that I saw at about the same time as the laundromat, now I've forgotten what it was, but fuck that jerk too.

Atheists protest National Day of Prayer by donating blood

Reported here:

The Center for Atheism, a national group of atheists based in New York City, will be holding its annual Gift to Life Day as an alternative to the National Day of Prayer on May 1. Atheists - as well as anyone else wishing to participate - will visit their local blood banks to donate blood and sign up for organ donation programs, said Ken Bronstein, president of both the CFA and New York City Atheists.

Computers

Man they're great.... when they work. That may have been the first time I've ever had a computer truly crash. I mean starting in DOS kinda crash and not wanting to go further. I'm still a long way from having it fixed but at least it works again. I blame it on the fact that I failed to give it a present for it's birthday, it was a biggy too. On 4-10-08 my PC turned 10 years old. Yeah, so I can't be too pissed when it dies, this thing should have kicked the bucket years ago. Thats what happens when you work at a non-profit. oh well.

Vactation

Ok I was on vacation, thats why I haven't been posting. Well thats why I didn't post till Monday, there will be a rant about why I didn't post yesterday. The vacation was fun, went to Ocean City MD and played golf with my dad a couple of uncles and some other fellas. It was a good time, hit some balls and drank some beers. I could say more but I've got ranting to do. Plus that was a little while ago now and I've had a bit of stress since then. Just know that I had a blast.

“Atheist ass pirate”

Tolerance, the Christian way, in God's army. Here's a CBS News report on the case of atheist soldier Jeremy Hall.

Related posts

Atheist soldier sues army

spiral-tuality xviii

NGC 6050 and IC 1179:


click pic to source on apod

National Day of Prayer

Tomorrow, May 1st, is being promoted by as the . So they all get together and pray for... what? It's hard to believe that nobody has ever prayed to end the war or feed all of the starving children or end poverty or rid the world of all suffering, etc. And if they have (and they surely have) and we still have all of these things (and we certainly do), then how the hell can they still believe prayer works?

It's the same old thing. The - just can't lose! If Christians pray for something and they get it, they thank him for answering their prayers. And if the thing they prayed for doesn't happen, they excuse him with something like, "It wasn't God's will" or "God has his reasons." (I wonder what his reasons could be for allowing innocent children to suffer through sexual and physical abuse, starving, and disease.)

And if their god is going to do whatever the hell he wants to do anyway, then why the hell pray in the first place?

Technorati Tags:
Thank you for subscribing to "By The Book Comics"

stormy weather

at ciclops:


click pic to source
'it is no great red spot, but these two side-by-side views show the longest-lived electrical storm yet observed on saturn by cassini.'
and
'cassini imaging scientists believe the storm to be a vertically extended disturbance that penetrates from saturn’s lower to upper troposphere.'

items off the beaten path….

…wherein commander other rambles for a bit about the new version of Wordpress, blogging in general, and other stuff that have made an impression on him recently.

For those of you who don’t know, commander other is a professional photographer with a peculiar bent in that he doesn’t feel that a “professional” needs to cram his photographs down the gaping maw of the world’s presumed interest. I serve my clients, I have fun with it, and they’re mostly happy with me, except when I take on more work than I can actually swallow effectively. But, unbeknownst to many of my bloggy friends, commander other is also a bit of a quality assurance geek. Long, long ago, I moved up from a systems configurator position and took over a quality management position for a small value-added reseller of Dell Computers in Albuquerque, NM and within the space of six months managed to walk them through ISO-9001 certification without any credentials or direct quality management experience. Prior to that, I had been beta-testing for a couple of software companies, and over the years since then, have been an active beta and alpha-tester, sometimes paid, even, for about three dozen companies ranging from the gaming industry to business software. I recently stepped back into quality management for a company that makes software that serves the health care industry, so I now spend most of my waking hours (and many of my sleeping hours) hunting bugs and coordinating communications between our client and our development on production issues. After fifteen years working for myself as a photographer, this has been a very interesting trip back into the corporate world, and nearly-ironically, I’m loving it.

All that to say, I’m very handing at pointing out problems with things. Hence my (not so much recently) bent for photographic snarkery: the age-old “What’s wrong with this picture”, with a subjective twist. Coincidental to our recent move and taking on the new job, Wordpress has released a new version (2.5) and a new update to that version (2.5.1) in which some of the most heinous downgrades to Usability issues were undertaken in the name of progress. I won’t bore you by rehashing old tirades and conversations on that issue; they’re all google-able and Wordpress-searchable. However, as our fabulous designer and I were also updating my websites, I learned a few things about plugins that may or may not interest my fellow self-hosted Wordpress users.

  1. Whether you have upgraded to Wordpress 2.5 or 2.5.1 or not, the first thing you need to do is remove your Wordpress Stats plugin. Yes, remove it. Get rid of it. Then, go make yourself a FREE account with Google and sign up for Google Analytics. It’s free, it’s efficient, and it doesn’t have any appreciable impact on your page-load like Wordpress Stats does. Yes, that’s right. If you noticed that the otherwhirled has magically started loading pages a little faster recently, it’s not because I haven’t been posting so much, it’s because I removed Wordpress Stats and a few other plugins. Not only does Google Analytics give you more information, but you can also look at it just as topologically as Wordpress Stats does (if you don’t care about the details), and even topologically, it’s still a more accurate report.
  2. Here’s another plugin you don’t really need: Ultimate Tagwarrior and it’s later, more refined pseudo incarnation of Simple Tags. They’re good, really they are. They’re helpful, even. If you need to make site-wide changes to your tags. Once you’ve made those changes (if you needed to), at the very least, disable them. Having either of these running as an active plugin behind your site also increases the slowness, and 2.5/2.5.1 does actually have a fairly efficient tagging system now. Use that instead. If you need to convert tags, reattribute tags to posts or something like that, active the plugin, do it, then turn it off. While I am greatly appreciative to the Simple Tags developers, my sites are all faster for not running them all the time.
  3. On that general subject, go look at your plugins and see what’s sitting there uselessly, hardly ever touched and contributing nothing to each page-load until you do “touch” it. If it ain’t doing anything on a per-page-load basis, deactivate it.
  4. You don’t need a plugin to manage your robots.txt, so if you’re using something like KBRobots.txt plugin, deactivate it after you make your changes. All that one does is provide an editing window for your KBRobots.txt file anyway. A smart blogger like you knows how to use a text editor and an FTP program, right? Drop that one.
  5. You don’t really need a “Maintenance Mode” plugin, either. I hope, though, if you use one, you have it deactivated when you’re not making changes to your blog template or structure.
  6. I don’t think that non-tech bloggers really need other little gimmick plugins like the Wordpress Admin Bar (which I admit is handy, but there’s this weird thing called browser bookmarks that work just as well), or the Wordpress Dashboard Editor, because (again), if you setup your important admin pages in your bookmarks, what do you even need to stop by the dashboard for? Wordpress will tell you if it needs updating, and the developer blogs that get gratuitously shoved into the dashboard by default are generally pretty boring to read, like this post is.

So there you have it. Nifty tips from the jerk-wad, Wordpress-loving blogger with not enough time on his hands. I had to write this hugely detailed summary status last night, though, so the writing bug was in me. Which reminds me I need to come up with something for the next Carnival of Liberals. I’m tired of missing those.

May 15 Deadline

US Fish and Wildlife is under the gun as a result of a US Court order to release their findings and determine whether or not the Polar Bear is endangered by May 15th.
The conservation groups argue that with polar bear numbers declining, there is an urgent need to protect its remaining habitat.

But the government had stalled on making a decision since the original petition went forward in 2005.
At the court, Judge Claudia Wilken ruled that the slow progress put the government in breach of its obligations.
"Defendants have been in violation of the law requiring them to publish the listing determination for nearly 120 days," she concluded.

Polar bears' ice habitat is being compromised by climate change
Judge Wilken also denied the government's request for a further delay, and ordered it to forgo the traditional 30-day waiting period between making a decision and implementing it.

The US Fish and Wildlife Service must now decide whether to list the polar bear as endangered, or to put it in a lesser category of risk such as threatened, or to keep it off the list entirely - an option which would immediately lead to further legal action from the conservation coalition.

If it is listed, campaigners will argue that anything that might impinge on the creature's habitat, such as recently announced plans for oil and gas exploration off the Alaskan coast, must either be cancelled or put under much more rigorous scrutiny.
They will also argue that the only way to prevent the Arctic becoming entirely ice-free in summers in the coming decades is to make drastic cuts in greenhouse gas emissions.

Two years ago, scientists compiling the internationally recognised Red List of Threatened Species decided to include polar bears, giving them a listing of Vulnerable to Extinction.

Warming Arctic seas and a marked decline in sea ice during the summer months made it likely, they concluded, that numbers would fall by one third within three generations (45 years). [SOURCE: BBC NEWS]
If the US lists polar bears as endangered, Canada will be next to be tapped to list the animals as an endangered species.

I have to believe the problem here isn't whether or not the polar bears are facing possible extinction, but whether or not the government wants to acknowledge the part greenhouse gasses play in that eventual extinction. The US continues to balk at placing reasonable restrictions on greenhouse gasses, preferring to support business and industry over environmental concerns. The polar bear is going to be a major test of the government's resolve in this matter.

This is not the first time US Fish and Wildlife has been called into question over where it's loyalties lie. While there area a great number of people in US Fish and Wildlife doing excellent work, and who are dedicated to the job the department was constructed to do, there are still lingering doubts about some higher ups and whether or not governmental strings are being pulled which sabotage the efforts to protect wildlife in the US.

Boy (Who Is Not Me) Wants to Kill Jesus


This unfortunate-looking attention seeker

art.plot.suspect.ap

got the attention he was looking for yesterday.

Ryan Schallenberger (Really?  My spell-checker recognised that?) plotted to blow up his high school.  No, not because people made fun of his awkward attempt at facial hair, but because he wanted to die, go to heaven and kill Jesus.

Sigh.

Nobel Laureate: Bernardo Houssay

  The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1947. "for his discovery of the part played by the hormone of the anterior pituitary lobe in the metabolism of sugar" Bernardo Alberto Houssay (1887 - 1971) received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his work on pituitary gland hormones that affect carbohydrate metabolism. He shared the prize with Carl and Gerty Cori. Houssay was mainly

separation of church and plate

the colbert report: the word

Enchanted ABQ and NAMI WALKS


Support the National Alliance on Mental Illness with us by walking with us or donating to NAMI for our walk. Visit our group NAMI WALKS WEBPAGE for more information. We'll be participating in the 5K walk on May 3, 2008.

As big as dinner plates?

Why is it that every time a journalist writes about large squid eyes, they've got to compare them to dinner plates? It's so trite. How about hubcaps? Frisbees? How about just giving the dimensions and leaving it at that? Oh, well, I've had to miss most of the live webcasts of the colossal squid anatomy lesson, just because my schedule is horrid this week, but I've caught up with some of the details, thanks to the most excellent Te Papa Blog, which has nicely fleshed out the lessons with lots of photographs.

Last night's Café Scientifique here in Morris was discussing the dumbing down of traditional media, and comparing coverage of scientific issues on TV and in newspapers (usually execrable) with new media, like blogs (which at least have the potential to actually provide depth.) I was struck by that difference here. Read the USA Today article on the colossal squid eye, which boils down to basically, "Oooh, they're big!". Then compare it to the blog entry on the colossal squid eye, written by a scientist. The latter is much more informative, and contains more specific details, and isn't afraid to challenge the reader with words longer than a single syllable.

Read the comments on this post...

As big as dinner plates?

Why is it that every time a journalist writes about large squid eyes, they've got to compare them to dinner plates? It's so trite. How about hubcaps? Frisbees? How about just giving the dimensions and leaving it at that? Oh, well, I've had to miss most of the live webcasts of the colossal squid anatomy lesson, just because my schedule is horrid this week, but I've caught up with some of the details, thanks to the most excellent Te Papa Blog, which has nicely fleshed out the lessons with lots of photographs.

Last night's Café Scientifique here in Morris was discussing the dumbing down of traditional media, and comparing coverage of scientific issues on TV and in newspapers (usually execrable) with new media, like blogs (which at least have the potential to actually provide depth.) I was struck by that difference here. Read the USA Today article on the colossal squid eye, which boils down to basically, "Oooh, they're big!". Then compare it to the blog entry on the colossal squid eye, written by a scientist. The latter is much more informative, and contains more specific details, and isn't afraid to challenge the reader with words longer than a single syllable.

Read the comments on this post...