
marriedtothesea.com
Excellent summation on why a lot of us are angry at religion: http://gretachristina.typepad.com/greta_christinas_weblog/2007/10/atheists-and-an.html
Last week, I ran this contest:
Complete the next line(s) of the poem:
‘Twas the night before Christmas, when all through the house
Not a creature was stirring, not even a mouse;
I was just expecting a couple lines, but some of you wrote entire poems! And they were awesome. I’m only included some lines of the winning poems below, but the link provided sends you to the entire thing.
Here are the Top 5 lines… or more (with submitters)!
5|
In the week before Christmas, commercials abound
Letting us know of the sales all around
The billboards were run by the highway with care
In hopes that consumers soon would be there…(Tim)
4|
My life mate and I, seeing kids off to their bed
Decided to stay up and watch TV instead.
Then as it went on our ears burst in pain
FOX News was having its ‘War on Christmas’ again.(Anatoly)
3|
As the pious Christian families were kneeling in prayer
The atheists began a war on christmas, Bill-O did declare.
“They hate the sweet baby Jesus,” the right-winger host did say.
“Stop giving gifts, heathens. This is our Good ‘Ol US of A.”
Sure, we don’t mind, you can have prayers and your nativity
But we just prefer Einstein’s theory of relativity.(Josha)
2|
‘Twas the night before Christmas and all through the house,
Not a creature was stirring, not even a mouse,
We hide in silence, the creatures and I, all equally fearful,
Outside the Evangelicals swarm, they’ll give you an earfulYowling and buzzing, a song of insect and cat,
A hideous, horrible, heinous Hillsong, if you could imagine that,
“Lord this, Lord that, baby Jebus be praised,
Believe us, The Word is Truth. You’ll be shocked and amazed!”(Bartlett)
1|
‘Twas the night before Christmas, when all through the house
Not a creature was stirring, not even a mouse;
For the mouse was dead, the children sedated,
And Santa was late, the neighborhood gated.He got to the house, nanosecond to ten,
Dropped off the coal, in the atheists’ den.
He does this work early, to save him some stress,
The naughty were many, logistics a mess.(Tolga K.)
Congratulations to the winners! The top three will be receiving specially-made Friendly Atheist wristbands (in the color of their choice), sent to me by blog reader Shauna and her sister Danni!
…
If you’d like to win your own wristband, here is the new contest:
What will be the New Year’s Resolution for any of the “New Atheists” (Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, Daniel Dennett, etc.)?
Funny and creative answers will have a shot at winning.
Good luck!
Yikes. More Florida school boards — in St Lucie, Palm Beach, and Martin counties — are infested with creationists. Florida Citizens for Science is maintaining a watch list.
So…have you checked your local school board? Do you have creationists biding their time, waiting to corrupt your schools?
Read the comments on this post...Christine Lutz, a Seventh Day Adventist was asked to leave a Fort Worth City bus for reading her bible too loudly. She claimed to be observing the Sabbath by reading to her children on the way to church.
...'Oh, but it's the perfect time and the perfect place since it is our Sabbath and it is the time with the Lord and therefore I'm going to continue.' And I continued," she explained.
Then, a TRE supervisor came on board. Lutz also told him that she would not stop reading. She and her family were escorted off the bus.
Source: cbs11tv.com - Woman Escorted Off Fort Worth Transit Bus For Reading Bible Aloud
Sounds like policy enforcement to me. I smell a fundie nutball.
I wonder if the story would have received the same coverage if it had been the Koran?
Don’t you think that it is a sad state of affairs when the President of the United States can’t be trusted to make a controversial appointment to some public office without the advice and consent of the Senate? That’s what’s going on at the moment. The Senate has scheduled, while out on holiday recess, a series of pro forma sessions, in order to create the fiction that the Senate is still in session, thereby preventing Bush from making a recess appointment, something he’s allowed to do under the Constitution. You can read about it here.
The Senate had asked him to, essentially, promise not to do that, by offering to ratify certain proposed appointments of his, in return for holding off on one that they deemed controversial. He refused. So the Senators now have to go through the sham of taking turns showing up in the Chamber, gavel the Senate open, then gavel it closed again, all in the matter of a few short seconds, just to prevent the President from defeating the “Advice and Consent” provision of the Constitution, albeit if for only a year.
You would think that the Senate could trust him to hold off until proper consideration could be given to his appointment proposal, or that he would agree to allow the normal process of Senate hearings to review the appointment, but apparently past experience led them to the current state of distrust. They probably remember when he appointed John Bolton as Ambassador to the United Nations, when he was unable to be formally confirmed after being officially proposed by Bush. Bush waited until the Senate was in summer recess, then appointed him for a year.
Anyone remember when Bush claimed he was “a uniter, not a divider”?

I've been slacking off on Pharyngula lately — I've had a week to relax and get caught up on a few other things. Here, though, are a few links to ridiculous religiosity that have been piling up in the mailbox.
Cockroaches are God's wrath. And did you know Jesus had a roach problem?
Vera Ivie knows what GW Bush's problem is: we haven't been praying hard enough for him. Get on your knees now!
You know what would help Christianity's image problem? If all the ministers were clowns. Oh, wait…they already are. Never mind.
Pope Ratzi has a chief exorcist (which implies a lot of little assistant exorcists, too…), and he has declared Harry Potter to be satan. Good Catholics seem to have a real problem distinguishing reality from fantasy, don't they?
In a related news item, the Pope has set up exorcism squads to fight satanism, which is synonymous with godlessness. I'd be looking forward to a visit from strange people in red robes and funny hats, but this is from the Daily Mail, and it's illustrated with a picture from the movie, The Exorcist, so this is of dubious provenance.
Revere looks at Christianity Today's tally of the most important events of the year. Most of them weren't that important.
Somebody might have hurt a pro-lifer in some tussle at a protest somewhere. There doesn't seem to be any trustworthy account anywhere of this unfortunate (if genuine) event, but that won't stop the right-wingers from shrieking about it. In other news, Cthulhu has risen from the dark depths…you won't find any newspaper or police accounts of this, but trust me.
This is the time of year when people pause to look both backwards and forwards. As I look back on the year 2007, I am struck by the tremendous intellectual changes the deacon and I went through this past year. The processes began years, even decades, earlier, but it was only within the past year that we set our minds free and dared to examine our lives, our world and the universe in ways that are, to us, completely novel.
Looking ahead to 2008, we have decided to use this New Year to mark the start of a new, faith-free life together. We will be doing this by renewing our marriage vows in a private ceremony. The vows we exchanged in 1979, which we composed, were heavily laden with Christian language and ideals. The vows we will exchange tonight, again composed by us, have been stripped of all religious imagery. The old ideals that constrained us will be replaced by a new vision of our life together. The new vows reaffirm our commitment to each other’s individual growth and fulfillment, as well as to our relationship, and express our joy in venturing forward into a future unbound by the shackles of religious dogma.
People who are steeped within religious traditions often have difficulty understanding how non-believers can face the world. They ask, what is your purpose in life? Or, what do you hope for? At this point, the deacon and I are still developing our answers to such questions. We are excited by the idea that we are free to design our own purposes for living. Our hopes are to live our lives in ways that will honor our families, our friends and ourselves, and to do whatever lies within our small powers to leave this world a better place than it was when we entered it.
I think these excerpts from two well-known humanist authors, one still very much alive and the other long dead, summarize our thoughts very nicely.
The first selection is excerpted from Richard Dawkins’ lovely essay, To Live at All is Miracle Enough:
We are going to die, and that makes us the lucky ones. Most people are never going to die because they are never going to be born. The potential people who could have been here in my place but who will in fact never see the light of day outnumber the sand grains of Arabia. Certainly those unborn ghosts include greater poets than Keats, scientists greater than Newton. We know this because the set of possible people allowed by our DNA so massively exceeds the set of actual people. In the teeth of these stupefying odds it is you and I, in our ordinariness, that are here….
[W]e have finally opened our eyes on a sumptuous planet, sparkling with colour, bountiful with life. Within decades we must close our eyes again. Isn’t it a noble, an enlightened way of spending our brief time in the sun, to work at understanding the universe and how we have come to wake up in it? This is how I answer when I am asked — as I am surprisingly often — why I bother to get up in the mornings. To put it the other way round, isn’t it sad to go to your grave without ever wondering why you were born? Who, with such a thought, would not spring from bed, eager to resume discovering the world and rejoicing to be a part of it?
The second excerpt is from Walt Whitman’s Leaves of Grass collection:
O me! O life!… of the questions of these recurring;
Of the endless trains of the faithless–of cities fill’d with the foolish;
Of myself forever reproaching myself, (for who more foolish than I, and who more faithless?)
Of eyes that vainly crave the light–of the objects mean–of the struggle ever renew’d;
Of the poor results of all–of the plodding and sordid crowds I see around me;
Of the empty and useless years of the rest–with the rest me intertwined;
The question, O me! so sad, recurring–What good amid these, O me, O life?Answer.
That you are here–that life exists, and identity;
That the powerful play goes on, and you will contribute a verse.
I hope all of you will join the deacon and me in contributing a few humble, worthwhile lines to the drama of life!
–the chaplain



I found this article rather fascinating mostly because I’ve long thought that “our technological and medical advances have removed most of the selection pressures acting upon us”. That such is not the case makes for interesting possibilities.
Human evolution is speeding up. Around 40,000 years ago our genes began to evolve much faster. By 5000 years ago they were evolving 30 to 40 times faster than ever before and it seems highly likely that we continue to evolve at this super speed today.
Our population explosion and rapidly changing lifestyles seem to be the drivers of this acceleration, the discovery of which contradicts the widely held notion that our technological and medical advances have removed most of the selection pressures acting upon us.
Modern times causing human evolution to accelerate - being-human - 14 December 2007 - New Scientist
In case neither Heather or myself get the chance before tomorrow (GMT of course), this is just a quick Happy New Year to all our readers - even those whose calendars don’t change over at midnight
. We will try to get back into the swing of lots of ranting about idiocy as soon as the holiday season allows us.
Huckabee is a fundie of epic proportions. He is so anti-gay that to elect him would be equivalent to ushering in a fundie inquisition. American Gays would face four hard years.
In 1997, Huckabee requested an amendment to a state Senate bill stating “that it is Arkansas public policy to prohibit sodomy to protect the traditional family structure.” [Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, 1/23/1997]
Source: Think Progress: Huckabee: "I Don't Know" if People are "Born" Gay, But It's A "Choice" To Act Gay
Huckabee would bring his morality and sense of Christian superiority to the White House. And then.... well, it is not a pretty picture.
I finally got to watch Jesus Camp, a movie that everybody had been recommending. It was on A&E last night so I commandeered the TV and set my brain to stun mode.she wore a burka for a week during her daily life in Washington, D.C.Actually, as many pointed out in the comments, she wasn’t actually wearing a burka but an abaya and a niqab, but the function was the same. She wandered around D.C. doing her shopping, riding on the subway, even bought a one-way ticket to New York that she had no intention of using, just so she could go through airport security. Everywhere she went, she was surprised by the lack of hostility she experienced. People went out of their way to either act indiferent to her or interested in speaking with her about “her culture”. However her final conclusion, really it was her viewpoint all along, was that such clothing was a symbol, much like the uniform of the Klan, and should be banned for what it symbolises.
In the Western world, the hijab has come to symbolize either forced silence or radical, unconscionable militancy. Actually, its neither. It is simply a woman's assertion that judgment of her physical person is to play no role whatsoever in social interaction.The second concept unfortunately leads a lot of Muslim men to believe that those who don’t cover do want to be treated as sex symbols giving them the license to harrass or rape (after all men can’t control their sexual desires, oh no). And since they don’t want a whore for a wife or daughter, they force them to cover.
In Islam, a woman is free to be who she is inside, and immune from being portrayed as sex symbol and lusted after.
but two sisters are refusing to return to school after an incident at their school. The incident in question concerns a classmate who decided to rip pages out of a Bible.
As many Parker High School students get ready for Christmas break, junior Elle Jacobson is at home and will not be returning like her friends.
“I have never felt threatened like that in a classroom before,” said Jacobson.
The 17-year-old is talking about an incident in her English class two weeks ago during a class presentation.”
This boy got up and his visual aid was a Bible and a book. And he got up and started his speech by saying ‘Now, this piece of crap’ and pointed to the Bible.”Jacobson said that she quickly felt threatened.”He took the Bible and he said, ‘I’m going to do this because I can. I’m going to do something that your stupid, little minds aren’t going to be able to comprehend and he took the Bible and started ripping out pages.”
What caught my eye is that the Bible was only one of the books the unnamed student held up. The second is alleged to have been a collection of works by Ralph Waldo Emerson. If you’re familiar with Emerson’s work then you know that a reoccurring theme is that conformity is a vice.
From the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy on Emerson:
Conformity is the chief Emersonian vice, the opposite or “aversion” of the virtue of “self-reliance.” We conform when we pay unearned respect to clothing and other symbols of status, when we show “the foolish face of praise” or the “forced smile which we put on in company where we do not feel at ease in answer to conversation which does not interest us” (CW2: 32). Emerson criticizes our conformity even to our own past actions-when they no longer fit the needs or aspirations of the present. This is the context in which he states that “a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen, philosophers and divines” (CW2: 33). There is wise and there is foolish consistency, and it is foolish to be consistent if that interferes with the “main enterprise of the world for splendor, for extent, …the upbuilding of a man” (99).
Conformity in America as it relates to the Bible is that the collection of works is something good, worthy of being preserved - despite what one may actually think of the collection. It’s the foolish face of praise, the forced smile. If this unnamed book was in fact the student’s second book, it puts his remark about doing something the other student’s could not comprehend into striking context and proved his point.
“Little minds” cannot fathom that someone would look upon a revered symbol and precede to destroy it. Such minds retreat back to the castle, where all is safe and sound.