Monthly Archive for May, 2007Page 2 of 5
So why ... ruin it by making up stories about a creator that fiddled around and whipped up the whole thing in six days? That makes it sound so trivial. So mundane. So ... disenchanting. My nature was the product of several billion years of refinement. It has matured, like a fine wine. It is mysterious and wonderful because I don't assume that it happened for a reason, or at the hand of a master designer. Because I don't assume that human beings have lived on this planet but for a fraction of a percent of its existance.
I love driving in rural areas, especially ones that are new to me. I frequently get urges (so far unmet, but one of these days...) to stop the car and run up a hill to an isolated spot. I want to sit down right there, and wonder if any other human being had ever sat down right there before, or was I the first? And to think of all of the animals that had been right there, and what kind of lives had they lived, and sights they had seen. To think of all the strange plants and creatures that had been right there, but have long been extinct. Wouldn't the concept of somebody actually creating that spot ruin that feeling? Wouldn't the unconscionable brevity of the creation story of existence minimize the wonder of the ages past?
We are not the product of evolution, of course. Evolution doesn't work like that -- there is no destination. But we are undeniably part of the same wonderous device that is evolution, and therefore part of the same wonderous machine that is our universe. In the vast set of equations that are silently being perfomed every time two people fall in love, or whenever the weakest antelope falls prey to the lion, or when baby sea turtles fight their way across the beach, or as the tree with the strongest roots survives the storm, or when a butterfly flaps its wings in Tokyo...we are part of the system. What is more, we are only particularly special because we are aware of the system, and we are slightly more influential in the system than most of the other creatures on this planet. Which is to say, completely ineffective on a solar scale, much less universal.
In the immortal Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy series, Douglas Adams (an atheist, thanks to Richard Dawkins) envisioned that the perfect punishment was to be given awareness of how small and insignificant one really was in the universe. I don't believe this would effect many atheists. Myself, I rather like feeling that I am only a tiny part of the universe, because it means there is so much else out there to learn. But for many theists, this might indeed be the perfect torture. After all, theist mythology was born from a world that was very small, from the point of view of its inhabitants, and it hasn't developed as much as it might have since then.
But as humanity and human knowledge has grown, so has our awareness of the world. Believing that the universe was created by one being, let alone within a week, and that all of the animals on the planet could co-exist, much less fit, on a boat for more than a year, is shrinking the amazing universe we live in to an unappreciably small existance. Would the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel be nearly as awe inspiring if it was painted on the head of a pin? No.
The only way to truly appreciate the grandeur and splendour of the universe is by not taking it for granted. By explaining away our existence in just a few of pages in Genesis, we are making up answers to questions that deserve a lot more attention. A lot more ... reverence.
Thanks to Chuck of Unbecoming Levity for the nice images: a logo, a favicon and two buttons for linking to PA (possibly on your blog's sidebar).
I've also changed the order of some stuff in the sidebar, and actually killed a few unnecessary sections, so that the available options are more visible (options BELOW the huge list of blogs? What the hell was I thinking? :)), and more clearly explained. Look for them at the top of the sidebar.
Oh, and I've fixed a few things in the members' Technorati ranks table, so that the information isn't lost if Technorati is down when trying to update, and also so that any temporary "weird" values are handled correctly.
Thanks to Chuck of Unbecoming Levity for the nice images: a logo, a favicon and two buttons for linking to PA (possibly on your blog's sidebar).
I've also changed the order of some stuff in the sidebar, and actually killed a few unnecessary sections, so that the available options are more visible (options BELOW the huge list of blogs? What the hell was I thinking? :)), and more clearly explained. Look for them at the top of the sidebar.
Oh, and I've fixed a few things in the members' Technorati ranks table, so that the information isn't lost if Technorati is down when trying to update, and also so that any temporary "weird" values are handled correctly.
Hey, you never know... maybe god speaks to the fishes too. Too bad the young saviour was killed by a stingray, or maybe that was the sacrifice needed.. lol
Ok seriously, I came across this in "The New Scientist" about a "Virgin Birth" and I could not resist. It makes one wonder... Is it possible for humans to reproduce asexually? Sure, it probably is very rare.. but could this possibly explain many of the stories about virgin births? I mean heck... is it possible that Mary was actually a hermaphrodite? Yes, highly unlikely... but quite interesting to ponder :)
Hey, you never know... maybe god speaks to the fishes too. Too bad the young saviour was killed by a stingray, or maybe that was the sacrifice needed.. lol
Ok seriously, I came across this in "The New Scientist" about a "Virgin Birth" and I could not resist. It makes one wonder... Is it possible for humans to reproduce asexually? Sure, it probably is very rare.. but could this possibly explain many of the stories about virgin births? I mean heck... is it possible that Mary was actually a hermaphrodite? Yes, highly unlikely... but quite interesting to ponder :)
Link:
* Original Article
Link:
* Original Article
And now for something completely different... I just coded (for fun) a couple of scripts to show a table of Technorati incoming links and ranks for all the PA members. The table is sorted by Technorati ranks, which are kind of (that is, don't take it too seriously) a measure a blog's success among other blogs; it counts the recent (180 days or less) links to a blog. How that rank is calculated is kind of mysterious, though, and, anyway, it's not a perfect system (for instance, some of the blogs are listed as having 0 links, which obviously can't be true, unless those blogs aren't listed on Technorati yet). [EDIT: that seems to be the case; the blogs are there, but don't have ranks yet. It must take some time.]
Therefore, don't put too much faith in it, and don't use it as a measure for the success of your blog. It's a toy. For fun. Nothing more. If you know another members of PA personally, it allows for playful competition among you, but I hope you don't start any real life feuds or something. :)
Since it involves making 76 queries (and rising) to Technorati, I'm updating it only once a day (midnight GMT). Enjoy...
[EDIT: added each blog's Google PageRank to the table. Why not? :) ]
And now for something completely different... I just coded (for fun) a couple of scripts to show a table of Technorati incoming links and ranks for all the PA members. The table is sorted by Technorati ranks, which are kind of (that is, don't take it too seriously) a measure a blog's success among other blogs; it counts the recent (180 days or less) links to a blog. How that rank is calculated is kind of mysterious, though, and, anyway, it's not a perfect system (for instance, some of the blogs are listed as having 0 links, which obviously can't be true, unless those blogs aren't listed on Technorati yet). [EDIT: that seems to be the case; the blogs are there, but don't have ranks yet. It must take some time.]
Therefore, don't put too much faith in it, and don't use it as a measure for the success of your blog. It's a toy. For fun. Nothing more. If you know another members of PA personally, it allows for playful competition among you, but I hope you don't start any real life feuds or something. :)
Since it involves making 76 queries (and rising) to Technorati, I'm updating it only once a day (midnight GMT). Enjoy...
[EDIT: added each blog's Google PageRank to the table. Why not? :) ]
"... A growing culture of radical secularism declares that the nation cannot profess the truths on which it was founded [...] We are told that our public schools can no longer invoke the creator, nor proclaim the natural law nor profess the God-given quality of human rights. [...] In hostility to American history, the radical secularists insist that religious belief is inherently divisive and that public debate can only proceed on secular terms [...] Too often, the courts have been biased against religious believers. This anti-religious bias must end ..."
-- Newt Gingrich, speaking at Liberty University
Gingrich: Challenge 'radical secularism' (AP via Pioneer Press)
How much of our history is merely perception colored by those seeking to attain power? This nation was not founded on Christianity, why does that simple fact continue to elude these twits? Shall we go back to Jefferson and check... AGAIN?
"Believing... that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their Legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church and State." --Thomas Jefferson to Danbury Baptists, 1802. ME 16:281
"[When] the [Virginia] bill for establishing religious freedom... was finally passed,... a singular proposition proved that its protection of opinion was meant to be universal. Where the preamble declares that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed, by inserting the word "Jesus Christ," so that it should read "a departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion." The insertion was rejected by a great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend within the mantle of its protection the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahometan, the Hindoo and infidel of every denomination." --Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821. ME 1:67
The great Virginian Thomas Jefferson understood that our country must espouse no religion, in order to protect them all. Theists who hold their religions near and dear (especially Christians) should be very wary of those who want to infuse their religion into politics. I discussed this last October in my article Looking Into the Abyss:
...If you are a religious person, and if you believe that politics is largely despicable, then it follows that you may believe that getting your religion into politics will improve the state of politics and make it less dirty. But, like the mixing paints, doing so will also infuse the dirt of politics into your religion. Priests will become politicians, and politicians will become priests, each less suited to their role than they were before. Keeping your religion away from politics is the best way to keep politics away from your religion... if you don't eventually you'll find that the power-hungry have invaded your churches and turned them into something they were not intended to be. Mixing the two leaves you with neither...
Southern Baptists, at least the ones who cheered Newt on at Liberty University, are pushing this nation toward theocracy. It desperately concerns me that they haven't thought this through. For his part, Newt is considering a run for president in 2008. And so once again, the power hungry tell the religious what they want to hear in order to win votes. Jefferson understood this too:
"History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes." --Thomas Jefferson to Alexander von Humboldt, 1813. ME 14:21
Fellow citizens, we have our work cut out for us. ![]()
As of a couple days ago, Unbecoming Levity has joined Planet Atheism as a contributing feed. You might have spotted the new link in my sidebar under "Badges and Doodads". Planet Atheism is a feed aggregator for a large number (75 at present, and counting) of atheist-themed blogs. This makes it a very nice source for catching up on atheist bloggers and seeing what's going down in the non-believer blog-o-sphere.
ULev regulars will no doubt be thinking that people reading Planet Atheism will not want to hear about my new teeth or the funny thing my cats did the other day. I agree. That's why there's a new topic in my topics sidebar called "PlanetAtheism". The Planet Atheism aggregator only subscribes to that topic, so not every article on ULev will be dumped onto Planet Atheism's feed (much to their relief I'm sure!) This is possible because Blog Harbor offers category-driven blogs, where each category can have its own RSS feed.
Belonging to Planet Atheism has already caused an uptick in my hits, and brought new commenters to Unbecoming Levity, for which I am very grateful. I encourage anyone who has an atheist themed blog (or a category-driven blog with occasional articles of interest to atheists) to contact the proprietor of Planet Atheism and see about inclusion. (If you're curious, here's their FAQ.)
Even if you don't, at least drop the Planet Atheism feed into your aggregator (Google Reader, Bloglines, whatever...) and you will never run short of articles of interest to atheists.
What is Planet Atheism?
Planet Atheism (PA) is an aggregator of atheism-related blogs. At any time, PA shows the most recent twenty or so posts from its member blogs, in chronological order.Is Planet Atheism a blog?
No, it's an aggregator of blogs. It doesn't have original content of its own, but gets it from the member blogs.In practical terms, however, you can read it as a blog with more than 75 different authors. :)
Is PA a blogroll, then?
Again, no. Technically, a blogroll is simply a list of links, like those most blogs have on their sidebars. There are also more "serious" blogrolls, which are maintained by someone and then shared among many blogs. For instance, one I heartily recommend is Mojoey's Atheist Blogroll. We're not in competition, since we provide two different services; in fact, we're members of each other's service. :)Are you ripping off other people's content?
Not at all. All of the members have either asked to join, or accepted my invitation. I'd never add a feed to PA without the author's express permission.What can PA do for me and my blog?
Two words: increased readership. Many people who might never have found your blog otherwise (not due to lack of quality, but simply because the web is so huge) may read it through Planet Atheism, enjoy what you write, and visit your blog to post or read comments.Sounds cool! Can I join?
Sure, if your blog is about atheism, secular humanism, protecting the separation of church and state, denouncing the abuses of religion, and so on. Details on joining are at the end, since I'd like you to read the rest of the FAQ first. :)Wait... most of my posts aren't about that at all, though I do write a couple of good ones on that subject from time to time. What can I do?
I'd never tell anyone to write about anything other than what they want to write, of course, so please don't ever consider changing your blog's subject matter because of PA. :) If at least 50% of your posts are about atheism, you can join (a little variety now and then actually makes PA more interesting, in my opinion).But what if your atheism-related posts are less than 50%? You have an alternative, then: provide a category feed, which includes posts from that category only. In WordPress, it's easy; I don't know if you can do it in Blogger, though. Consult your blog service / software's documentation, or, if desperate, ask, and maybe I or someone else can help.
What do I need to join?
Basically, your blog must provide an RSS or Atom feed. All the popular blog platforms (Blogger, WordPress, etc.) are fine.Also, this is not mandatory, but I'd really prefer if you provided full feeds, instead of just small excerpts, as many blogs are configured to do. For the (comparatively few) readers of PA who really prefer excerpts, there is a Planet Atheism - short posts version.
But I need to provide excerpts for some other service I'm a member of...
This one is easy: join FeedBurner (it's free), then configure your blog to provide full feeds, and FeedBurner to change it into excerpts. Provide your original feed to PA, and the FB feed to whoever needs excerpts.Wait a minute. If PA will provide my posts in full, won't that mean that nobody will need to visit my blog anymore? My blog is supported by ads, and...
In my experience, the advantages far outweigh any possible disadvantages:- readers will still need to visit your blog to comment or read comments, and with many more readers, the number who do so will actually increase
- your regular readers aren't likely to change their habits, and will keep visiting your blog; you won't "lose" anyone to PA
- since each of your posts in PA includes a link to the original version (on your blog), search engines such as Google recognize which is the original version, and send readers there, not to PA
- you gain PageRank from the links to your blog on PA, improving the odds of your posts appearing in search results
- being on PA makes you a part of a growing community which actively comments on each other's blogs, mentions your posts on their own blogs, and so on.
This is nice! What can I do to help Planet Atheism?
Basically, help spread the word. For instance:- Add a permanent link to PA on your blog's sidebar (you can use these buttons)
- Mention PA in a post (many current members already did this when joining, and it has helped a lot)
- Tell other people about PA ("did you know of this convenient place to read a bunch of interesting blogs about atheism and humanism?", or "we atheists aren't the monsters you believe we are. Want to know what we're really like? Here's a nice place to start...")
- Know of a great atheism-related blog that isn't aggregated? Suggest to the author that he/she joins!
- Unleash the power of social bookmarking: add PA to your del.icio.us bookmarks, join the PA community on MyBlogLog, vote for PA (by installing the toolbar, and clicking on "I like it" on it) on StumbleUpon, and so on.
Who are you?
I'm Pedro Timóteo, author of Way of the Mind, among other blogs and sites. More about me here.Why do you hate God? / You can't prove God doesn't exist! / etc.
Sorry, but this is a FAQ for Planet Atheism, not atheism itself. There are many fine atheism FAQs out there, such as this, this, or this.I'm sold! :) How can I join?
Just emailjoin@planetatheism.com with your blog's details (name, URL, feed URL, and possibly a short description).Last updated: 20 May 2007
What is Planet Atheism?
Planet Atheism (PA) is an aggregator of atheism-related blogs. At any time, PA shows the most recent twenty or so posts from its member blogs, in chronological order.Is Planet Atheism a blog?
No, it's an aggregator of blogs. It doesn't have original content of its own, but gets it from the member blogs.In practical terms, however, you can read it as a blog with more than 75 different authors. :)
Is PA a blogroll, then?
Again, no. Technically, a blogroll is simply a list of links, like those most blogs have on their sidebars. There are also more "serious" blogrolls, which are maintained by someone and then shared among many blogs. For instance, one I heartily recommend is Mojoey's Atheist Blogroll. We're not in competition, since we provide two different services; in fact, we're members of each other's service. :)Are you ripping off other people's content?
Not at all. All of the members have either asked to join, or accepted my invitation. I'd never add a feed to PA without the author's express permission.What can PA do for me and my blog?
Two words: increased readership. Many people who might never have found your blog otherwise (not due to lack of quality, but simply because the web is so huge) may read it through Planet Atheism, enjoy what you write, and visit your blog to post or read comments.Sounds cool! Can I join?
Sure, if your blog is about atheism, secular humanism, protecting the separation of church and state, denouncing the abuses of religion, and so on. Details on joining are at the end, since I'd like you to read the rest of the FAQ first. :)Wait... most of my posts aren't about that at all, though I do write a couple of good ones on that subject from time to time. What can I do?
I'd never tell anyone to write about anything other than what they want to write, of course, so please don't ever consider changing your blog's subject matter because of PA. :) If at least 50% of your posts are about atheism, you can join (a little variety now and then actually makes PA more interesting, in my opinion).But what if your atheism-related posts are less than 50%? You have an alternative, then: provide a category feed, which includes posts from that category only. In WordPress, it's easy; I don't know if you can do it in Blogger, though. Consult your blog service / software's documentation, or, if desperate, ask, and maybe I or someone else can help.
What do I need to join?
Basically, your blog must provide an RSS or Atom feed. All the popular blog platforms (Blogger, WordPress, etc.) are fine.Also, this is not mandatory, but I'd really prefer if you provided full feeds, instead of just small excerpts, as many blogs are configured to do. For the (comparatively few) readers of PA who really prefer excerpts, there is a Planet Atheism - short posts version.
But I need to provide excerpts for some other service I'm a member of...
This one is easy: join FeedBurner (it's free), then configure your blog to provide full feeds, and FeedBurner to change it into excerpts. Provide your original feed to PA, and the FB feed to whoever needs excerpts.Wait a minute. If PA will provide my posts in full, won't that mean that nobody will need to visit my blog anymore? My blog is supported by ads, and...
In my experience, the advantages far outweigh any possible disadvantages:- readers will still need to visit your blog to comment or read comments, and with many more readers, the number who do so will actually increase
- your regular readers aren't likely to change their habits, and will keep visiting your blog; you won't "lose" anyone to PA
- since each of your posts in PA includes a link to the original version (on your blog), search engines such as Google recognize which is the original version, and send readers there, not to PA
- you gain PageRank from the links to your blog on PA, improving the odds of your posts appearing in search results
- being on PA makes you a part of a growing community which actively comments on each other's blogs, mentions your posts on their own blogs, and so on.
This is nice! What can I do to help Planet Atheism?
Basically, help spread the word. For instance:- Add a permanent link to PA on your blog's sidebar (you can use these buttons)
- Mention PA in a post (many current members already did this when joining, and it has helped a lot)
- Tell other people about PA ("did you know of this convenient place to read a bunch of interesting blogs about atheism and humanism?", or "we atheists aren't the monsters you believe we are. Want to know what we're really like? Here's a nice place to start...")
- Know of a great atheism-related blog that isn't aggregated? Suggest to the author that he/she joins!
- Unleash the power of social bookmarking: add PA to your del.icio.us bookmarks, join the PA community on MyBlogLog, vote for PA (by installing the toolbar, and clicking on "I like it" on it) on StumbleUpon, and so on.
Who are you?
I'm Pedro Timóteo, author of Way of the Mind, among other blogs and sites. More about me here.Why do you hate God? / You can't prove God doesn't exist! / etc.
Sorry, but this is a FAQ for Planet Atheism, not atheism itself. There are many fine atheism FAQs out there, such as this, this, or this.I'm sold! :) How can I join?
Just emailjoin@planetatheism.com with your blog's details (name, URL, feed URL, and possibly a short description).Last updated: 20 May 2007
The National Association of State Boards of Education will elect officers in July, and for one office, president-elect, there is only one candidate: a member of the Kansas school board who supported its efforts against the teaching of evolution...
-- Evolution opponent is in line for schools post, Austin-American Statesman
Come on Kansas, don't let this happen again.

Planet Atheism buttons
FAQ (includes joining info)
RSS feed
Email subscription

