Monthly Archive for March, 2007Page 2 of 2

GodMen: Tyler Durden Meets Ned Flanders

I think some Christians saw Fight Club.

They apparently left the movie thinking that the one thing that could have made Tyler Durden cooler is a personal relationship with Jesus. So far I agree — a little more prayer and that movie would have been perfect. I started implementing Project Mayhem thousands of years before the Brad Pitt blockbuster hit theaters, and I was disappointed that it failed to credit Me. I should have trademarked mayhem. :-(

The GodMen, as they call themselves, could have taken that message of anarchy and manliness and gone on to start a new Crusade or the next Inquisition. They could have just started punching each other’s lights out. Instead they chose this macho Christian mission:

We are attempting to create a worship place for men that looks nothing like church. It is a place where men of no religion and men who have left the church break bread with followers of Jesus. Where simply being a man, created in Gods image, is celebrated.

It gets even better. What, you ask, could possibly be more manly than a bunch of guys getting together over a stack of Bibles to eat a marble rye and join atheists in celebrating Jesus? This, for starters:

We have committed to see what would happen if, for one day, our faith and its struggles would be discussed with absolute honesty, transparency and openness – not sugar coated or framed in church language but instead spoken in frankness and maturity where men can see their innermost fears, shames, and secrets brought to light in a safe environment.

It’ll be just like a hunting camp, getting together with your friends Ron the car mechanic and Bob the concrete pourer, and of course Stumpy the demolition man, to talk about man stuff like trucks and ammunition. Only instead of beer, guns, and fire, you can gather around Ecclesiastes and talk about your innermost feelings! Can you hear Tim Taylor grunting?

, , , , ,

Commandments

The commandments written by an omnipotent, omniscient "god":

- I am your Lord and God.
- You shall have no other gods before Me.
- You shall not make for yourself an idol.
- You shall not make wrongful use of the name of your God.
- Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy.
- Honor your parents.
- You shall not murder.
- You shall not commit adultery.
- You shall not steal.
- You shall not bear false witness.
- You shall not covet your neighbor's wife.
- You shall not covet your neighbor's house.
Source

The commandments written by an atheist:

- Do not do to others what you would not want them to do to you.
- In all things, strive to cause no harm.
- Treat your fellow human beings, your fellow living things, and the world in general with love, honesty, faithfulness and respect.
- Do not overlook evil or shrink from administering justice, but always be ready to forgive wrongdoing freely admitted and honestly regretted.
- Live life with a sense of joy and wonder.
- Always seek to be learning something new.
- Test all things; always check your ideas against the facts, and be ready to discard even a cherished belief if it does not conform to them.
- Never seek to censor or cut yourself off from dissent; always respect the right of others to disagree with you.
- Form independent opinions on the basis of your own reason and experience; do not allow yourself to be led blindly by others.
- Question everything.
Source

Some additions by another atheist:
- Enjoy your own sex life (so long as it damages nobody else) and leave others to enjoy theirs in private whatever their inclinations, which are none of your business.
- Do not discriminate or oppress on the basis of sex, race or (as far as possible) species.
- Do not indoctrinate your children. Teach them how to think for themselves, how to evaluate evidence, and how to disagree with you.
- Value the future on a timescale longer than your own.
Source: Dawkins, R. (2006). The God Delusion

As much as I feel compelled to compare, I think the mere act of putting them side by side does the job....

Commandments

The commandments written by an omnipotent, omniscient "god":

- I am your Lord and God.
- You shall have no other gods before Me.
- You shall not make for yourself an idol.
- You shall not make wrongful use of the name of your God.
- Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy.
- Honor your parents.
- You shall not murder.
- You shall not commit adultery.
- You shall not steal.
- You shall not bear false witness.
- You shall not covet your neighbor's wife.
- You shall not covet your neighbor's house.
Source

The commandments written by an atheist:

- Do not do to others what you would not want them to do to you.
- In all things, strive to cause no harm.
- Treat your fellow human beings, your fellow living things, and the world in general with love, honesty, faithfulness and respect.
- Do not overlook evil or shrink from administering justice, but always be ready to forgive wrongdoing freely admitted and honestly regretted.
- Live life with a sense of joy and wonder.
- Always seek to be learning something new.
- Test all things; always check your ideas against the facts, and be ready to discard even a cherished belief if it does not conform to them.
- Never seek to censor or cut yourself off from dissent; always respect the right of others to disagree with you.
- Form independent opinions on the basis of your own reason and experience; do not allow yourself to be led blindly by others.
- Question everything.
Source

Some additions by another atheist:
- Enjoy your own sex life (so long as it damages nobody else) and leave others to enjoy theirs in private whatever their inclinations, which are none of your business.
- Do not discriminate or oppress on the basis of sex, race or (as far as possible) species.
- Do not indoctrinate your children. Teach them how to think for themselves, how to evaluate evidence, and how to disagree with you.
- Value the future on a timescale longer than your own.
Source: Dawkins, R. (2006). The God Delusion

As much as I feel compelled to compare, I think the mere act of putting them side by side does the job....

Stop Squishing My Messengers

Ever wonder why you never see angels or other agents of Mine meddling directly in your affairs? After all, if I care so much about your belief, why shouldn’t I send My immortal servants to indisputably negate all doubt of My existence? To “test” your faith?

WRONG.

My messengers are with you all the time. And what do you do? You squish their little guts out with your Nikes. You smash their conical monuments to Me and you poison them in your kitchens. You trap them in a tiny glass farm and then toss in a piece of a leaf, like that makes it the medamned Garden of Eden or something.

Here’s another hint: they recently chewed the pattern into a leaf of Jesus and My sister-in-law Mary:

RIO DE JANEIRO, September 20 (RIA Novosti, Andrei Kurguzov) – Images of Jesus Christ and the Virgin Mary discovered on leaves in tropical Brazilian forests are divine messages made by ants, a local television channel has claimed.

Mary’s kind of of hot, isn’t she?

While theologians have joined forces with psychics to try to understand the phenomenon, scientists (as usual) are trying to spoil the fun:

While scientists continue their efforts to establish the origin of the mysterious images, theologians and psychics maintain these are messages from God.

Scientists should be in a better position than anyone to understand the divine source of these messages, because they know ants can lift twenty times their own body weight and can walk on water.  They’re crazy to look at those things and think, “yeah, that’s mortal.”

Ants have been carrying out My most important orders on Earth for a while.  These include:

  1. Pampering queens
  2. Walking on water
  3. Dragging dead caterpillars around
  4. Locating breadcrumbs
  5. Scurrying

If you humans were willing to get off your lazy asses and scurry over to your nearest dead caterpillar to do My work, I might not have even made a Hell in the first place.  But noooooo, you’d rather sit in church singing crappy songs about Me.  You know how you start to hate a song after the radio station’s been playing it too much for a few weeks?  Well, try listening to Amazing Grace several times a day for two thousand years — you’d be begging for the Macarena after a week.  And you wonder why I’m wrathful.

If you don’t have the guts to do My work, can you at least stop squishing them out of those who do?

, , , , , , , , , , ,

The Power Problem

Why is it considered wrong for most countries to have nuclear weapons? The simple answer is that nuclear weapons are too big a power for these countries to handle....

I was thinking of the power given to parents in raising their children. This power should not be underestimated. By giving two people almost complete control over the life of a child (or any number of children they deem appropriate), parents are, to a great extent, given control over the way the next generation thinks and acts. This would not be a problem if we assume that parents teach children human values and morals, the basics of how to tell right from wrong, logic and reasoning, and then allow them to explore the richness of the world around them with a free mind. However, if we go to the other extreme, we find that parents may transfer their full set of memes to their children without any sort of filtering, adjustment, or adaptation. With religious fundamentalists or extremists as well as some other cases, children are brought up in an environment that can cripple their thinking process or social activity irreversibly.

"Michael Shermer, in How We Believe: The Search for God in an Age of Science, describes a large survey of randomly chosen Americans that he and his colleague Frank Sulloway carried out. Among their many interesting results was the discovery that religiosity is indeed negatively correlated with education (more highly educated people are less likely to be religious). Religiosity is also negatively correlated with interest in science and (strongly) with political liberalism. None of this is surprising, nor is the fact that there is a positive correlation between religiosity and parents' religiosity. Sociologists studying British children have found that only about one in twelve break away from their parents' religious beliefs."

Richard Dawkins
The God Delusion

After reading the above statistics, especially the last part, one can't help but wonder: How free are we?

In my attempt to find possible solutions for this problem, I was reminded of a post by Devil's Mind about emotional rape that I thought was relevant to the subject. As with every problem, the first step to solving it is realizing that there's a problem to begin with. Psychological damage cannot be assessed as easily as physical damage, it becomes increasingly more difficult to undo as time goes by, and worst of all, the victim is generally unaware of the damage in the cases of imposing social or religious values.

There are probably hundreds of thousands of parents who realize that the world moves forward very quickly and that to bring their children up properly they need to expect change and accept it, be open-minded, and flexible. These present a partial solution to the problem. But what about the tens of millions of parents who don't follow the same course, who think they own their children and have the right to impose whatever ideology they see fit on them?

The Power Problem

Why is it considered wrong for most countries to have nuclear weapons? The simple answer is that nuclear weapons are too big a power for these countries to handle....

I was thinking of the power given to parents in raising their children. This power should not be underestimated. By giving two people almost complete control over the life of a child (or any number of children they deem appropriate), parents are, to a great extent, given control over the way the next generation thinks and acts. This would not be a problem if we assume that parents teach children human values and morals, the basics of how to tell right from wrong, logic and reasoning, and then allow them to explore the richness of the world around them with a free mind. However, if we go to the other extreme, we find that parents may transfer their full set of memes to their children without any sort of filtering, adjustment, or adaptation. With religious fundamentalists or extremists as well as some other cases, children are brought up in an environment that can cripple their thinking process or social activity irreversibly.

"Michael Shermer, in How We Believe: The Search for God in an Age of Science, describes a large survey of randomly chosen Americans that he and his colleague Frank Sulloway carried out. Among their many interesting results was the discovery that religiosity is indeed negatively correlated with education (more highly educated people are less likely to be religious). Religiosity is also negatively correlated with interest in science and (strongly) with political liberalism. None of this is surprising, nor is the fact that there is a positive correlation between religiosity and parents' religiosity. Sociologists studying British children have found that only about one in twelve break away from their parents' religious beliefs."

Richard Dawkins
The God Delusion

After reading the above statistics, especially the last part, one can't help but wonder: How free are we?

In my attempt to find possible solutions for this problem, I was reminded of a post by Devil's Mind about emotional rape that I thought was relevant to the subject. As with every problem, the first step to solving it is realizing that there's a problem to begin with. Psychological damage cannot be assessed as easily as physical damage, it becomes increasingly more difficult to undo as time goes by, and worst of all, the victim is generally unaware of the damage in the cases of imposing social or religious values.

There are probably hundreds of thousands of parents who realize that the world moves forward very quickly and that to bring their children up properly they need to expect change and accept it, be open-minded, and flexible. These present a partial solution to the problem. But what about the tens of millions of parents who don't follow the same course, who think they own their children and have the right to impose whatever ideology they see fit on them?

Sorry, We’re Out Of Ponies

I noticed in the comments of a Retrospectacle post about God’s financial woes that several people are disappointed He never brought them ponies to meet their childhood requests. I have just been informed that this was supposed to be My responsibility; apparently I am the god of horses as well as the sea.

I spoke to Heaven’s stable-hand, a nice young fella named Jesus. Long beard, good sandals. He told Me,

Uncle God’s completely backlogged on the pony requests. All of Our breeders up here in Heaven are going at it as fast as their little pony loins can pump, but even the stallions are having a hard time keeping up. It’s not like God can just artificially inseminate stuff; it would come out like some funky half-mortal chimera with five legs and a photosynthetic tentacle.

He rambled on about how cruel that would be, how everybody would just throw rocks at the pony and make it wear a crown of thorns and tie it to a stick. When I pointed out that He keeps most of the breeders tied to a post in their stalls, He just pouted and stuck His tongue out.  Maybe I’m missing some history here, but He seems to be a few fries short of a Happy Meal if you know what I mean. Then again, what do you expect from a guy who works around horses all day wearing sandals?

I’m going to check with God about getting a more stable stable-hand, then I’ll see what I can do about the pony situation. Sorry for the wait.

——————————————

P.S. God here. The post Poseidon referenced also called My blog “under-trafficked.” I would send the blogger to hell, but she’s absolutely right, and she gives Me the idea for a great New Commandment:

Thou shalt link to Me.

Over a hundred bloggers have already complied. There’s plenty of room here in Heaven for any others who wish to save themselves from the eternal doom of hellfire. We also have cocktail shrimp.

, , , , ,

Jerry Falwell’s Disposable Earth

kkk.gifReverend Jerry Falwell (quite possibly pictured at right with a friend), who holds sway over millions of Christians because his affair with Ted Haggard is not yet public, has made recent headlines by warning his followers that global warming is

“Satan’s attempt to redirect the church’s primary focus” from evangelism to environmentalism.

I’m skeptical. How would Jerry Falwell know what Satan is planning?

Last year Falwell acquired a sizable chunk of Satan’s shares in Hell in a crooked stock deal. Now the Prince of Darkness is worried about a hostile takeover, so he’s extremely tight-lipped around Falwell’s minions.

Nevertheless, Falwell does highlight an important point first made by Ann Coulter:

God gave us the earth. We have dominion over the plants, the animals, the trees. God said, “Earth is yours. Take it. Rape it. It’s yours.”

I made the Earth in less than 7 days. If you destroy it, I’ll just build you an other one and send Jesus down to carry all the True Believers to the new planet on a magic schoolbus. Sorry if I forgot to write part of that down in the Bible; it was a rush job and My publisher wanted an early start since it had to be handwritten for the first thousand years. Also, they didn’t know about schoolbuses yet.

Environmentalism is a petty distraction from the important things, like giving Me money and kissing My ass. Do you know how many ornate churches you could have built with the $2 billion wasted cleaning up the Exxon Valdez oil spill? Do you know how many thousands of people waste their weekends cleaning up roadsides and streams and seashores, when they could be knocking on doors at 8:00am shoving My book in peoples’ faces? Sometimes it feels like only Jehovah’s Witnesses really care about Me, but I know Jerry Falwell’s got My back too.

He has a history of statements about global warming which brilliantly integrate My new commandments. First, he applies the Pat Robertson commandment (evangelists are better than everyone else) to assert his authority over scientists:

I don’t believe in global warming in the first place, and I don’t believe we caused it, and I don’t think the science supports it.

Sure, the scientists think the science supports it, but most of them have PhDs from elite universities, where they presumably sip lattes in their ivory towers all day long, holding family meetings with chimpanzees instead of doing research. Falwell flunked out of the 44th best master’s-level university in the mid-Atlantic region in his sophomore year and went on to receive his bachelor’s degree in theology from an unaccreddited Bible college in Missouri. This allowed him to become an evangelist, which means he can authoritatively contradict smart people in their own areas of expertise because he has a direct line to My infinite wisdom.

Because Falwell’s education sheltered him from the temptation of reason, he is able to establish a conspiracy around global warming:

The fact is this whole thing is cyclical, and the scientists who are not on the payroll of the government to do these studies are saying the jury’s still out — there’s no such evidence there. But there are many who want to break the economic back of America by making us sign the Kyoto protocols while China, India, and half the world have said they would not do it.

This is a fantastic use of the Schlussel Commandment (thou shalt not research thine claims). If he had looked at some of the research suggesting humans cause climate change, he would have noticed that very few authors work for the federal government, and many work at universities in other countries or for privately funded institutions. Deftly sidestepping those facts, he proceeds from his faulty premise using even more faulty logic to suggest that scientists “on the payroll of the government” are conspiring “to break the economic back of America.” That’s right, they’re going to all this trouble just to dry up their own paychecks.

This inspires a new commandment, the Falwell Commandment:

Never let logic get in the way of a good point.

Some may question My decision to name this commandment after Falwell, arguing that Ann Coulter deserves the honor. But Ann Coulter is just a woman (as she would be the first to tell you). Falwell towers above her because people look to him for serious spiritual advice. Who else has the ear of the President tuned in to his pro-AIDS, anti-Constitution, anti-Semitic positions like these?

AIDS is the wrath of a just God against homosexuals. To oppose it would be like an Israelite jumping in the Red Sea to save one of Pharoah’s chariotters.

The idea that religion and politics don’t mix was invented by the Devil to keep Christians from running their own country.

I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People for the American Way — all of them who have tried to secularize America — I point the finger in their face and say, “You helped this happen.” (By the way, by “this,” he means 9/11.)

The Jews are returning to their land of unbelief. They are spiritually blind and desperately in need of their Messiah and Savior.

This makes it even harder to believe that Falwell privy to a Satanic conspiracy to undermine Me, because his rhetorical skills will make him a powerful competitor of Satan’s when he arrives in hell. I suspect he is exaggerating for effect, and that he actually believes the conspiracy was hatched by homosexuals, not Satan. I can forgive Jerry Falwell’s dramatic license in light of his important message that the Earth is kind of like toilet paper: you’re supposed to smear shit all over it, then flush it and get a new roll.

, , , , , , , , , ,

Mojoey’s Atheist Blogroll

I recently joined Mojoey's Atheist Blogroll. I found the collection of blogs in this blogroll to be quite intriguing. If you're interested and would like to join, you can find instructions and minimum requirements here.

Mojoey’s Atheist Blogroll

I recently joined Mojoey's Atheist Blogroll. I found the collection of blogs in this blogroll to be quite intriguing. If you're interested and would like to join, you can find instructions and minimum requirements here.

Blasphemous U.S. Mint Brings New Commandment

Via the column of pudgy conservative Tony Phyrillas on NewsVine, I see that the U.S. Mint has snubbed Me. This is one of the new $1 coins:

picedgelettering.jpg

In God We Trust appears on the edge of the coin, not the front! Tony shares My outrage:

“In God We Trust” has been our official national motto for 50 years and has been imprinted on U.S. currency going back to 1864. Prominently featured on currency, until now.

These are the same words that the ACLU and atheists like Michael Newdow have tried for years to have removed from U.S. currency and “The Pledge of Allegiance.”

Well, if you find yourself hit with a barrage of hurricanes sometime soon, at least now Jerry Falwell will know why. Nothing pisses Me off like money that doesn’t trust Me, especially when My checks are bouncing. Tony tries to get to the bottom of the problem:

Has the ACLU and the militant atheists infiltrated the U.S. Mint?

Actually it’s the ACLUSOST, the ACLU’s Special Ops Strike Team. They’re the same people who come to your bedside when you’re sound asleep and sneak contradictory passages into your Bible. The U.S. Mint had held out against them for decades while they infiltrated the design teams responsible for the U.S. flag, the Constitution, and the Statue of Liberty, not one of which has In God We Trust scrawled across it in a prominent font.

This calls for another of my New Commandments, hereafter to be called the Phyrillas Commandment:

Put My name front and center on your money, or else.

The militant atheists base their objection on the “Establishment Clause” of the U.S. Constitution, which reads:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.*

* = except in their national motto, on their money, and in tax code exemptions. Does not apply to executive orders with titles eerily similar to those the Constitution expressly prohibits.

Those atheists never read the fine print.

, , , , , , , , , , ,

Gods

Looking at this list, one can't help but feel the despair, and the yearning for a purpose, a higher power, and a reason for existence. A need, though self-generated, so blinding that humans throughout history enclose themselves in fake shells that with time become their whole reality (see Bubbles). The self-sustaining nature of religion that makes people see the lies others live yet consider themselves or their religion exempt amazes me.

Gods

Looking at this list, one can't help but feel the despair, and the yearning for a purpose, a higher power, and a reason for existence. A need, though self-generated, so blinding that humans throughout history enclose themselves in fake shells that with time become their whole reality (see Bubbles). The self-sustaining nature of religion that makes people see the lies others live yet consider themselves or their religion exempt amazes me.

Stephen Colbert’s Mansion in Heaven

Recently Stephen Colbert set a great example by praying to Me on the air to give thanks for all the prayers made on His behalf on Thursday, February 22nd. That was Stephen Colbert Prayer Day, a theological holiday declared by the Media Leader Prayer Calendar, a coalition of Christians who hope to reform the media by asking Me to do it for them.

The leader of the prayer group wrote:

I call upon you to pray earnestly for these people—both media leaders and cultural influencers. Pray for God’s personal impact on their lives, for His guidance and wisdom for them, for them to come to a deeper relationship with Him. Pray for God to infuse the decisions of these people with a strong, moral dimension and with a commitment to use the mighty power of media to uplift, inspire, and unify.

The Prayer Day was a huge success; I received exactly 126,231,638 prayers for Stephen Colbert, not counting the other hundred million from women asking Me to set them up on a date.

platypus.jpgBut let Me tell you, Stephen Colbert doesn’t need My wisdom. He doesn’t need My revealed truth because he can reveal his own. He is never wrong even when he is, and if he were he would have the balls not to admit it. Why would such a man need advice from the God who couldn’t even get the beaver right on His first try (see left)?

Nevertheless, Mr. Colbert was more than willing to trust Me with his own prayer:

Lord,May the people who prayed for me last Thursday have their decisions infused with a strong moral dimension. Namely to pray for me again next year. And maybe bump Larry King’s prayer day so I get two… just thinkin’ out loud. Anyway, for Thine is the Kingdom, amen. WOOOOOO! Jesus #1! Jesus #1! Jesus #1! EAT IT, BUDDHA! ‘Cause you seem to have eaten anything else.

So I don’t have any wisdom for Stephen, but wisdom is for liberals anyway. I can do event better: a church to pray for Stephen Colbert year round. I give you the Colbert Church of Christ (see the Google map if you don’t believe Me) complete with worshipers, sermons, and Ladies Bible Study on Thursday.

Hopefully these favors will hold Stephen Colbert over until his death at an unspecified 3-digit age, at which time he will take up residence in the mansion I’m having built for him in My court in the Kingdom of Heaven. It’s right across the street from Mine, in a spacious lot between Leonard Nimoy‘s and Gary Gygax‘s. As I write, Leonardo da Vinci is working on a sixty-foot statue of Tek Jansen for Colbert’s front yard, wrought of solid gold except for the balls, which are titanium. The atrium has a glass floor with a spectacular view of hell so that Stephen can taunt sinners and watch the Bill O’Reilly’s show.

, , , , , , , , ,