Monthly Archive for November, 2006

Much Ado…

Today's pathetically misinformed offended person story comes from Pagosa Springs in Colorado, where a homeowners' association tried to force a local resident to take down a Christmas wreath shaped like a peace symbol (link).

The owner of the wreath was told that it was "divisive" and that "3 or 4" residents had complained that the wreath was an anti-Iraq war protest or a symbol of Satan. The association stated it would impose a $25 fine every day until the wreath was taken down.

Forgetting the outrageously ridiculous premise that anyone should be able to tell you whether or not you can hang a wreath on your door... "symbol of Satan"???

Dear clueless religious wingnut in Colorado: the peace symbol was developed in Britian in 1958 as a symbol of nuclear disarmament and was adopted by peace movements everywhere. It has nothing to do with devil worship. The design of the symbol comes from the semaphore code -- a system of communication involving one person holding two flags in different positions to signify different letters and numbers. Before radio, it was often used by the military to communicate visually over long distances. The diagonal lines in the peace symbol match the semaphore for N, and the vertical line matches the semaphore for D. ND = Nuclear Disarmament.

The owner of the wreath says that it is a "spiritual thing" and not a war protest. That's not so hard to believe. For religious folks Christmas is a celebration of the birth of Christ who is sometimes referred to as "The Prince of..." Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? "The Prince of Peace".

Even if it was an anti-war statement, what difference does that make? People who want to live in a place where they will never have to see something that offends them should encase themselves in concrete and shoot themselves into space, for the benefit of us all. So someone is against the war, get over it.

You know what's really offensive? Homeowners' Associations.

At least in this case there is a happy ending. The association in question has changed its mind (link). One of those rare stories where reason prevails.


The Cosmic Connection

Panda's Thumb has a post with links to YouTube videos of a lecture given by Neil deGrasse Tyson (an astrophysicist of some reknown).  It's worth watching.

It was interesting to see and hear Mr. Tyson speak with passion about discovery and the "spiritual" feeling that comes from looking out into the universe and coming to the realization how we are all connected to it and part of it.  Given how every atom in our bodies which is heavier that hydrogen was forged in the cores of stars, he notes "We're not just in the universe, the universe is in us."

Perhaps most wonderful to me, was to hear confirmation of my crackpot ideas about what "spiritual feelings" are and why atheists can have them coming from Mr. Tyson.

The speech is about 16 or so minutes long, but it is worth seeing.  I found Mr. Tyson's conviction and depth of feeling about our connection to the cosmos touching.  I think in some small way I know how he feels.  When I finally get home in the evening from work I can't resist looking up at the stars for at least a moment or two before I walk into the house.  And whenever I do I feel a kinship to those distant stars.

It's nice to know someone else does too...


There’s No Science Like No Science…

I'm not going to take the bait. You're asking me to play a game: "Provide as much detail in terms of possible causal mechanisms for your [Intelligent Design] position as I do for my Darwinian position." [Intelligent Design] is not a mechanistic theory, and it's not [Intelligent Design]'s task to match your pathetic level of detail in telling mechanistic stories. If [Intelligent Design] is correct and an intelligence is responsible and indispensable for certain structures, then it makes no sense to try to ape your method of connecting the dots. True, there may be dots to be connected. But there may also be fundamental discontinuities, and with [Irreducibly Complex] systems that is what [Intelligent Design] is discovering.
-- William Dembski

Hijacking Science

Proponents of Intelligent Design speak compellingly in ways that sound convincing to young people, or people who want affirmation for their faith, and they often hijack science by misusing scientific findings to support their crackpot conjectures. The saving grace for scientists and other freethinkers is that the ID-nuts don't know what the heck they are talking about...