Cultic transformations.

Disturbing news story that qualifies for today’s new “You couldn’t make this stuff up and I don’t mean that in a good way” award. No prizes.

This week there have been more than enough horrors, such as the Burmese cyclone, that numb your responses with the numbers of dead and injured. As well as the more chilling and incomprehensible stories like the Austrian who kept his daughter locked in cellar for a quarter century and a German couple whose grown children found they had three dead babies in their freezer.

This latest mad “heart of darkness” tale brings in religion as well.

The BBC report says:

A Czech woman charged with deceiving a children’s home into thinking she was a 13-year-old girl has been found not guilty by a court in the city of Brno.
The court said Barbora Skrlova, who along with five others is believed to belong to a secretive cult, meant no ill-will towards the children’s home.
But Ms Skrlova, aged 33, was immediately re-arrested to face more serious charges of child abuse.
Ms Skrlova went on the run after the child abuse case erupted.
She re-appeared months later in Norway, where she posed as a 13-year-old boy.

Blimey. Hypnotised like a hen on a chalk line, I must find out more.

Thanks to the miracle of the Internet, I’ve looked at the development of this story in Czech.
25/05/07 A boy was taken into care after mind-numbingly horrific levels of abuse. So was his 13-year-old “sister” who the mother was trying to adopt. But she turned out to be a 34-year-old woman. (Well, the Czech paper says 34. Ages seem very fluid in this story. )

14/01/07 Woman posing as child may have fallen victim to strange sect

The mysterious case of the Czech woman charged with identity fraud after posing as a 12-year old girl in the Czech Republic and a 13-year old boy in Norway has shocked and baffled the nation. Czech investigators are slowly piecing together the picture of her life and there are serious indications that she was a victim of a sect whose members made a profit from child-abuse films.
Barbora Škrlová as a 13-year old boy,
The strange case first surfaced when Barbora Škrlová was found living with a woman who tortured her two young boys. Škrlová, then living in the family under the guise of their 12-year-old sister Anička, was put in a children’s home where she duped social workers into believing they were dealing with a stricken, abused child. Anička fled the home and disappeared for many months surfacing unexpectedly in Norway last week where she had been living and attending school under the guise of a 13-year-old boy.
Is this strange figure - at the centre of a frightening child-abuse case - a criminal or a victim? Teachers and social workers who knew her in the Czech Republic and Norway say she appeared withdrawn, unbalanced and may herself have a history of abuse. Marie Vodičková head of the Czech Fund for Children in Need says it seems that she was most likely abused as a child and then turned into an obedient puppet by a sect which may have made a profit from making and selling child-abuse films. There is at least one direct piece of evidence to support this theory – the torture of one of her alleged brothers was documented day and night by a professional camera system. Both boys showed signs of abuse – cigarette burns in their genital regions and numerous welts and bruises. The children said they had been tortured by several members and “friends” of the family.

She appeared “unbalanced”? Oh the beauty of understatement.

Škrlová’s teacher in Norway says she decided to contact the Norwegian police after the alleged 13-year-old boy painted a picture showing seven children all bruised and bleeding and each with a number.

Her biological father

“who is believed to be the head of this strange sect once led a religious group called The Ants which splintered off from the Holy Grail Movement centred in Europe. Czech experts on religious sects say that whatever is going on in this terrifying community, it is unchartered territory because there is no known sect in Europe involved in child identity fraud. What is particularly worrisome is that this strange case came to light by pure accident when a neighbour of one of the abused boys got a glimpse of him bound and naked in a closet – on his own baby monitoring device.

(I have to drop any pretence of having read this in the original language. It’s all from the English version)

According to the July 2007 Independent

The Grail Movement follows the teachings of Oskar Ernst Bernhardt, a German also known as Abd-ru-shin, who from 1923-38 wrote the Grail Message, which depicts man as a being whose spirit can return to its source in heaven by performing good deeds on Earth. It claims to have at least 10,000 followers worldwide, including several hundred in Britain.
“We broke with the people involved in this 11 years ago, after they added to the Grail Message with their own imaginings and fantasies,” said Artur Zaplukal, spokesman of the Grail Movement in the Czech Republic, where it has about 1,500 followers. “I sent them a letter telling them they were no longer part of the Grail Movement.”

So these weird people are a a break-away movement considered too eccentric even by an apparently off-the-wall cult.

Just when you think you can understand a bit of this, the Independent threw in a few more odd facts, such as the fact that Barbora - of indeterminate age and gender and apparently parentage - is the second cult member to have masqueraded as “Anna” the “girl” that the woman who tortured her own sons wanted to adopt.

Arrgh. My head hurts…… How many dangerously more insane cults are there?

SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "Cultic transformations.", url: "http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2008/05/10/cultic-transformations/" });

Still No Updates from the American Atheists Board

Ellen Johnson, former president of American Atheists, hasn’t said anything publicly yet (and hasn’t responded to an email inquiry) about her recent firing.

But others are making their voices heard… and they’re not all too happy with the AA Board’s decision:

I am Gil Gaudia. My wife Jeanne and I have been editorial assistants for the past two years at American Atheists. In doing so, we have worked closely with Ellen Johnson whom we respect and admire greatly. We have also had telephone and email contact with a few of the board members, especially with regard to editing their manuscripts. We were not impressed with their interpersonal skills. I have also contributed several articles to the magazine. We have just concluded an hour long telephone conversation with Ellen.

We are extremely biased in her favor, because we found her to be hard-working, honest, courageous, competent and caring of us and appreciative of our volunteer contributions.

This board’s action, in our opinion, will almost certainly result in the end of the organization and publication as we know it. We say this because, from first-hand experience we are aware of the number of hours, the amount of coordination and the knowledge of the operation that are all required to successfully produce a monthly publication, and we have no evidence that any of the board members are willing and able to invest that degree of commitment. Indeed, we have some reason to believe that the opposite is true. To those members who propose hiring Dawkins, Hitchins, Harris and others for the presidency, first see if they’ll agree to work for 38K, or thereabouts, in addition to doing latrine duty in their spare time.

For the board of directors of the most well-known Atheist group in America to have taken such a suicidal action is incomprehensible, but whatever their reasons, unless the members protest strongly and demand her reinstatement, (which she may not even want) it will only be a matter of time before we no longer have an organization to uphold the civil rights of Atheists.

As a contributor of many articles to this magazine, and as volunteers in editing other journal articles, spending many hours of our time in assisting Ellen in producing this publication, we are no longer interested in writing, editing or assisting in any way a magazine whose board has acted in such an irresponsible, unfair and self-destructive manner.

Gil and Jeanne R. Gaudia

To be fair, there are other groups that will continue to fight for the rights of atheists.

But a strong AA, with a well-respected president and spokesperson, is good for all of us.


Technorati Tags: ,

Share This

The Colson thing already getting amusing

Kazim and I have heard back from Mike Pritchard, who told us he's sending us Colson's book and all that. Kazim then set out a few parameters for how we would like any dialogue to go, mindful of the fact that our usual dealings with apologists reveal them to be, oh, less than scrupulously honest, shall we say. Mike responded with this interestingly worded note.Yes, this all sounds great to me. I

Scientology has lost its wealthiest member, James Packer


Glosslip has just relayed from the Sydney Morning Herald that the Cult of Scientology has lost its wealthiest member: billionaire Australian James Packer. Associates of Packer have confirmed that he has been making efforts to distance himself from the organization, during its time of controversy over its strong stance against psychiatry (funny how the article in the Sydney Morning Herald did not mention the various other issues currently plaguing the cult - like how tomorrow thousands of people will be gathering for the fourth international day of protest against Scientology). Packer is reported to have been recruited into the cult by friend Tom Cruise during a very low point in the billionaire’s life - having just been divorced by his wife, experiencing the very public and humiliating collapse of his family’s business One.Tel and losing $350 million in the process, and being overweight and depressed, to boot. Packer, in the past, has said that he found Scientology to be helpful and to have improved his outlook in life. He also reported having received help from Scientologist friends. His reported reason for discontinuing course work in Scientology and distancing himself from the organization is that he feels that he no longer needs the help.

For more on Scientology, click here.

When will they learn? Another internet poll

The town of Frankenmuth, Michigan likes to flaunt their crosses — they've put them up on signs, and they've got one on the city logo. I suspect the town contains a Christian majority, so their local news probably felt safe putting up an online poll asking,

Should Frankenmuth remove its cross from the city shield?

They don't expect a horde of ravening godless atheists to descend on them and vote "YES!" — they never do. Mount up, internet warriors, and assault their poll with fire and sword and level it until they reel back crying for mercy.

Frankenmuth won't know what hit them.*


*Literally; most probably won't even notice. It's just a pointless internet poll.

Read the comments on this post...

Every Sperm is Sacred! Mrs. Duggar’s up the stump (again).


With her eighteenth! Holy (repeated) fuck!

41 year old Michelle Duggar, baby factory delux, has another bun in the oven. One wonders if Michelle with her, shall we say, rabbit-habit, even go into labour anymore, or do the sprogs just drop out when she does the dishes?

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. - It’s a happy Mother’s Day for an Arkansas woman — she’s pregnant with her 18th child. Michelle Duggar, 41, is due on New Year’s Day, and the latest addition will join seven sisters and 10 brothers. There are two sets of twins. …

The Duggars’ oldest child, Josh, is 20, and the youngest, Jennifer, is nine months old.

The fast-growing family lives in Tontitown in northwest Arkansas in a 7,000-square-foot home. All the children — whose names start with the letter J — are home-schooled.

Duggar has been been pregnant for more than 11 years of her life, and the family is in the process of filming another series for Discovery Health.

The new show looks at life inside the Duggar home, where chores — or “jurisdictions” — are assigned to each child. One episode of the new show involves a “jurisdiction swap,” where the boys do chores traditionally assigned to the girls, and vice versa, Duggar said.

Well, I suppose if they can afford it, who can complain, but then again, this is the internet, and so why not? OK, so its a TV and internet spectacle. That won’t harm the kids. Being gawked at by millions while you are growing up and having a million of fundamentalist Christians live their vicarious “family values” through you really is the way to live out your nervous teenage rebellious years.

If they want to make spectacles of their kids, why not have a laugh? Perhaps they are not fundamentalist protestants after all. They sound like Roman Catholics (at least according to Monty Python).

Good thing SHUFFL proposed a well fitting religious bra for her some time ago!

What is funny, however, is that their old, very Christian, website that I linked to in the bra post (http://www.duggarfamily.com/) that had this to say:

“God has opened many doors for them to share that children are a blessing from the Lord! They have been featured on four Discovery Health / TLC documentaries entitled,“14 Children and Pregnant Again!”, “16 Children and Moving In!”, “Raising 16 Children!” & “On The Road With 16 Children!”. … The Duggar’s desire is to make Christ known and for others to see that the Bible is the owner’s manual for life.”

now simply redirects to the Discovery Heath site linked to above, and it really hasn’t got much to say about God at all! Hmmm. I guess they figured that Christ everyone has already been made known to everyone and that most folk already has picked up a copy of life’s manual, and so now they can just be a spectacle for a commercial media empire with a clean conscious! Isn’t God great?

Reciting the Lord’s Prayer in Ontario’s Legislature

 Premier Dalton McGuinty started the debate in February when he called for a study of the current practice [Lord's Prayer review ordered]. Queen's Park Bureau Chief In a bid to separate church and state – or, in this case, province – Premier Dalton McGuinty wants to end the practice of reciting the Lord's Prayer in the Ontario Legislature. McGuinty surprised observers at Queen's Park this

It seemed that their defence of free speech was not entirely consistent.


Love the quote above from the National Secular Society's report on the final ending of the Blasphemy Law - some may see it as the thin end of the wedge- I see it as the start of a beautiful friendship lol - this law has been hanging around our necks for far too long in England (not sure if it extends to Scotland and Wales- shall have to look that up) and now- we can say what the hell we like - at least about the protestant church in England- without fear of being clapped in jail- not that anyone has recently- but it could have happened while this law was still around- so here is a little history for you:

The last person in Britain to be sent to prison for blasphemy was John William Gott on 9 December 1921. He had three previous convictions for blasphemy when he was prosecuted for publishing two pamphlets which satirised the biblical story of Jesus entering Jerusalem (Matthew 21:2-7), comparing Jesus to a circus clown. He was sentenced to nine months' hard labour.

In 1977, Denis Lemon, the editor of Gay News was found guilty of blasphemous libel for publishing James Kirkup's poem The Love that Dares to Speak its Name which allegedly vilified Christ and his life (Whitehouse v. Lemon). Lemon was fined £500 and sentenced to a suspended sentence of nine months imprisonment. It had been "touch and go", said the judge, whether he would actually send Lemon to jail.

In 2002, a deliberate and well-publicised public repeat reading of the poem The Love that Dares to Speak its Name took place on the steps of St Martin-in-the-Fields church in Trafalgar Square and failed to lead to any prosecution.

The last prosecution for blasphemy in Scotland was in 1843.

so-- what's next??
Disestablishment I reckon- what do you think? About time we kicked the 'Church of England' into touch? I think so.






In other news- that idiot Cardinal Cormac Murphy O'Connor made a fool of himself on Radio 4 this morning- it was great to listen to and this kind of thing is the only reason I listen to Radio 4 on my drive to work- because I cannot stand John Humphry's smarminess and superior attitude otherwise.

You can listen to it here and on the same page to the right you can listen to Richard Dawkins - the reason why the Cardinal was so fraught :)and read what Terry Sanderson has to say about it all :)





And Stephen Green at Christian Voice is at it again- promising a protest against an as yet unmade and not even planned show involving the auditioing of thousands of people who want to play the part of Jesus in 'Jesus Christ Superstar' - not a bad show actually with one or two fabulous songs - but Mr Green- please! at least wait for the show to be made before you start getting your incedibly white knickers in a twist.





The abortion debate is beginning to get into full swing- with more research out about survival rates of premature babies - giving fuel to the fire - I have more reading to do on the science yet but I still remain on the side of a woman having the right to choose - where I do waver is the time limit and removing the necessity for a medical doctor to ok the procedure- which is a hangover from a very very patriarchal post-war society -where I don't waver is when any religious argument is brought to bear - and note I say religious and not moral or ethical arguments- which do have a bearing- more to come when I have done my reading.

see also here and here plus here for a religious view and here if you want to get involved and want a clear scientific view






Finally- the next Anti-scientology protest is tomorrow- so good luck and cyber-support from me for anyone who is going on them. Stay safe- stay Anonymous!

Keep Your Banana…


PLATYPUS: the Creationist's Nightmare!

Boston Radio Personality Attends Bizarre Scientology Birthday Party for L Ron Hubbard


WBCN Boston Radio personality describes his peculiar experiences at the Cult of Scientology Boston LRH birthday party. His experience as he reports was indeed very strange, though no longer shocking in the slightest for this observer. In fact, what would have been most shocking is if the event had proceeded as a perfectly normal birthday party held in the honour of a dead cult leader by 200 of his overwhelmingly passionate, paranoid, secretive, largely brainwashed and image-conscious followers who believe that he was a great prophet, is currently still alive in disembodied spirit forum conducting Scientological/spiritual research at various corners of the universe, and will be coming back sometime in the future to share his scholarly work and guidance with his devout followers…. Actually, that was pretty much what this was.

Check it out to hear about how the invited guest was treated with great skepticism, caution and awkwardness, and to hear about how hundreds of Scientologists cheered their hearts out for a pre-recorded 2 hour long DVD video presentation by Scientology Head, David Miscavige. I suppose the cheering isn’t that weird, though. I mean, I did at first. But upon further consideration, I’m sure many people would cheer at a pre-recorded video being presented to hundreds of supporters for the first time. Though the radio personality did claim that they were getting highly excited over pretty mundane statements. I’ll give the audience the benefit of the doubt a bit here and assume that the guest was probably exaggerating somewhat.

For more on Scientology, click here.

And don’t forget that the next international day of protest against the Cult of Scientology is TOMORROW at CoS locations everywhere!

Cardinal spouts nonsense on Radio 4’s Today programme

REASON alone is “dangerous” to society; it has to be tempered with faith if we are to avoid repeating horrors committed by the likes of Hitler and Stalin.

So said Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, leader of Roman Catholics in England and Wales, when interviewed this morning on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, following a lecture he gave yesterday.

He lamented the fact that “the Christian voice” was increasingly being stifled in the UK, and made the astonishing claim that people in Britain want Church leaders to speak out on key policy issues.

The Cardinal sounded less than pleased when interviewer John Humphrys put it to him that that religious leaders, in the view of people like Professor Richard Dawkins – interviewed earlier on the programme – “talk rubbish”, and should, therefore, not be permitted to interfere in government matters.

The Cardinal’s then went on dish out some garbage about atheists “constructing God” simply in order to knock him down, and to repeat the claim that Britain was a “Christian country, with 70 percent of the population professing a belief in the Christian faith”.

He added:

Britain should not be allowed to become a God-free zone.

Terry Sanderson, President of the National Secular Society, lost no time in launching an excoriating attack on Cormac-O’Connor in this morning’s Guardian.

Murphy-O’Connor … speaks with forked tongue when he tries to portray the Catholic Church as some persecuted institution that means harm to no one. He says the Catholic Church is caricatured as ‘some heartless, insular institution that wants to deny people their freedom’.

Cardinal - this is not a caricature. It is the truth. Your own actions and pronouncements confirm it. You have tried to deny human rights to homosexuals, you have tried to rob women of the right to choose contraception and abortion and thereby take control of their lives, you have tried (and continue to try) to interfere with scientific research that may lead to the alleviation of enormous suffering.

You have attempted to manipulate the political process by pressurising Catholic MPs. On a personal level you - and your Church - try to control every aspect of your followers’ lives, from telling them what to think, what to eat and when to eat it, to telling them who they can sleep with and even what they can and cannot do when they get between the sheets …

Pam Ann Airlines - Like No Other In The World

If you've never seen Pam Ann perform, you don't know what you're missing. I first saw her on a cruise a few years back and thought she was hysterical. The following videos give the viewer a sense of her act though nothing can replace the in person experience.

In her act, she plays an airline stewardess for Pam Ann Airlines. As you might imagine, Pam Ann is the epitome of every bad experience one has ever had while flying. She's utterly and completely irreverent and nothing is off limits for Pam Ann.

The first video is a promo for her show and gives you a glimpse of the many faces of Pam Ann as she switches between different stewardess personae....from stodgy British flight attendant to one that will remind you of an uptight German general to a sheepish server from Singapore wearing her signature spectacles.

In the second video, Pam Ann presents the airlines preflight safety instructions.

If you ever have the chance to see her show, you're in for a treat.

Pam Ann - Come Fly With Me

Pam Ann Airlines Safety Instructions

Outstanding YouTubery


Continuing the “God is Logic” Discussion

As I’ve stated in the post below, I have left the “Cross Examined” site but will be continuing my part in the discussions here, so as not to be 1984ed. Frank and the others may participate here, or at CE, or not at all, as they choose.

FRANK:
Saying that God’s nature and logic are unchangable, congruent and simultaneous does not mean that God is ontologically dependent on logic. I suppose you could say that if God did not exist than neither would logic because his nature is the grounding of logic. You could say the same about justice. But that is exactly the point I’m making. Logic or Justice (morality) does not exist unless God exists.

DAVE:
By saying ~G -> ~L (if no god, then no logic), you are making logic contingent upon God. And once again we’re back to where we started: human discourse presupposes the nonexistence of any entity which is defined as being an entity upon which logic is contingent.

Let me put it YET ANOTHER way: the only way that logic could be both necessarily existing and by definition a part of God would be if God himself were necessarily existing. The only way to show that God is necessarily existing would be to produce a sound ontological argument for God’s existence. Having studied analytical philosophy of religion my entire adult life, I can state with much confidence that no such argument exists. So there’s no rational way for you to maintain that logic presupposes, or is evidence for, God’s existence.

Former Surgeon General Carmona On Health Care In The U.S.

I remember when Richard Carmona was appointed as the U.S. Surgeon General by George W. Bush. At the time, it was uncertain as to his actual ideological leanings though he seemed to be a thoughtful individual. As it turned out, he was an apolitical advocate for the betterment of health care in America...and thus often at odds with the Bush administration.

In the following video, Carmona offers his insights and observations into the job of Surgeon General and what is needed to address our growing inability to provide affordable health care to so many of our citizens. His own assessment is that a focus on wellness will do more to transform our health care system than would the adoption of universal health care.

Carmona cautions that the rapid expansion of costs to care for accelerated incidences of chronic illness must be addressed if we are going to be able to provide better health to more people. Further, as income disparities grow, the potential to address chronic illness becomes less likely. He appropriately notes that we don't actually have a health care system in America; rather our system is only focused upon providing care for those who are sick.

He points out that chronic disease is also preventable...though he wisely notes that addressing these diseases requires an awareness and a willingness to repair the underlying socioeconomic factors that enable them. Carmona explains that poverty contributes significantly to the inability to make prevention a focus.

In the video, Carmona provides a comprehensive look at the factors that impact our ability to insure the health of Americans. It is an excellent primer on the obstacles we face and the reasons they exist. The question and answer session covers a number of specific health topics including immunizations, the Bush administration's opposition to stem cell research, aging, and others.

Autism Spectrums And DORE Speculations


So, I’m still waiting on a reply from DORE Australia, after reading a great blogger on the topic of DORE. You see, I have an unanswered question. Something I emailed to them last month and got a cheery reply to, even!

Simple enough question, I thought. “Why would the Australian website for DORE claim that they do not publish research on that site which hasn’t been peer reviewed… when an article in the Leamington Courier, dated January 2008 features claims about research that isn’t peer reviewed yet in any journals?”

“…In addition 56 people who had been formally diagnosed as suffering from autism have now completed the programme. Of this number 100 per cent showed improvement across a battery of cognitive, literacy and motor tests and 72 per cent showed improvement in social skills, self esteem and mood.”

Hell of a claim, huh? I’m still waiting, DORE? About a month now, or near enough?

See, I first bumped into DORE at the ‘Mind, Body, Spirit‘ Festival in Melbourne, in November. Amongst the psychic halls, magnetic masseuses, really bad cherry-cordial touted to be great for my constitution (note, organisers of MBS - don’t put competing tonic drinks next to each other, because they snipe. I ended up with five sodding cups of goo before I was bullied into saying ‘yes, your organic berry-drink tastes just a little less crappier than theirs‘).

Oh, many people in Australia watch the popular current affairs program Four Corners, which featured a report on DORE last year. Good summary, if you wish to read the transcript.

My M.Ed in Special Learning Needs mostly focused on gender issues and gifted and talented education. But you can’t really escape looking at topics like autism and dyslexia, dyspraxia and ADHD and the like - certainly not as a teacher in schools, where professional development is pretty much expected. In fact, the very things that DORE claims to care about have been a part of my education for a very long time.

If you’re not a regular reader of science blogs, then you should probably catch up on some of the important issues regarding vaccination myths and autism, and the snake-oil garbage / claims like chelation therapy and mercury myths that abound. I’d suggest sites like Neurologica Blog, Brain Duck, Holford Watch and of course Respectful Insolence on the topic. More recently you may have heard about the political element involved with ‘what causes autism’ - Aetiology has recently summed up some of the unfortunate comments made in the USA.

In fact, it was Brain Duck who pointed out to me that when the DORE people in Melbourne handed me this pdf form, that it looks very much like a basic crib sheet for ‘difficult questions’ to ward off people like myself. Do I just read the research at the end of that handy sheet and leave it as that? The answer is no. I ask questions.

You see, I have access to not only blogs and news articles, but journal articles that say things about DORE Achievement Centers, like:

Remarkable success is claimed for an exercise-based treatment that is designed to accelerate cerebellar development. Unfortunately, the published studies are seriously flawed. On measures where control data are available, there is no credible evidence of significant gains in literacy associated with this intervention. There are no published studies on efficacy with the clinical groups for whom the programme is advocated. It is important that family practitioners and paediatricians are aware that the claims made for this expensive treatment are misleading.

The most recent paper I can find (and yes, you can read all about the saga of this particular journal Dyslexia here, thanks to Brain Duck) only said:

How likely is it that the linguistic gains reported by Reynolds and Nicolson (Dyslexia, 2007; 13: 78-96) are due to test-retest effects?… findings suggest that two of the four linguistic gains reported by Reynolds and Nicolson (2007) are due to test-retest effects (phonemic segmentation and working memory). The remaining two tests are measures of spoken language and not reading. Hence, the data reported by Reynolds and Nicolson (2007) are not sufficient to support DDAT as an effective treatment for children with reading difficulties.

Not only have I been waiting for DORE’s answer, I’ve also become a little more aware how people really do think some rather odd things about autism. A mailing list that I subscribe too had a bunch of people (yes, professionals in their field) demonstrate this to me. It centered around this lady: Amanda Baggs.

According to some in the mailing list I subscribed to, she’s a fake - ‘What an elaborate hoax.’

Sadly, this just indicates that the stereotype is stronger than the research and evidence one can find upon three main forms of Autistic Spectrum Disorders (ASD), being autism, Asperger’s syndrome, and PDD-NOS (or Pervasive Developmental Disorder Not Otherwise Specified). ASDs can’t be easily dismissed as involving ‘just able to do X and Y and nothing else’. It’s not true that it equals being like the silent, beautiful blonde toddler in the children’s novel October’s Child by Eleanor Spence or even just being like Charlie in the recently released Australian film, The Black Balloon.

One of the blog entries on Science Based Medicine discusses the changes in definition and continuing investigations - a book I picked up recently by Daniel Tammet, ‘Born on a Blue Day‘ kind of says some of it for me:

When I was a child, doctors did not know about Asperger’s Syndrome (it was not recognised as a unique disorder until 1994) and so for many years I grew up with no understanding of why I felt so different from my peers and apart from the world around me. By writing about my own experiences of growing up on the autism spectrum, it is my hope that I can help other young people living with high-functioning autism, like my brother Steven, to feel less isolated and to have confidence in the knowledge that it is ultimately possible to lead a happy and productive life. I’m living proof of that. Born on a Blue Day, Daniel Tammet, p.15.

I can also point to the example of Dr Temple Grandin. I can and have taught the novel ‘The Curious Incidence of the Dog in the Night-time‘. Science blogger John Wilkins even talks about his son and himself as having high-functioning Asperger’s Syndrome. There’s more than a handful of people I admire who I’ve met online (more often than not, online) and in real life who fit somewhere on the spectrum, all unique as anyone else you might care to mention. That’s kind of the point behind the word ‘spectrum‘?

Amanda Baggs herself, in an interview on CNN’s site, recommends a book - ‘Autism and the Myth of the Person Alone’. I hoped that posting a link to the Wired interview with her would help a little with the dismissal that her YouTube videos got - The Truth About Autism: Scientists Reconsider What They Think They Know.

Oh, whilst SWIFT claims that a fifteen-year old documentary on FC, ‘Frontline: Prisoners of Silence‘ will be taken from public viewing - (’before the zealots who support this farce can get it taken down‘) - to be brutally frank, it just isn’t the case.

Frontline has had this out for SO many years, James Randi, and it’s hardly likely to remove the evidence of it that easily! There’s a great transcript of that documentary ‘Prisoners of Silence’ here, for a start. There’s a few libraries that still carry VHS copies, like my local - and clearly it’s found in full online.

I am still looking into communication methods, but I know that other test situations, using linguistic analysis and documentation of physical and independent typing, indicate shown individual authorship (Cardinal, Hanson and Wakeham, 1996; Tuzzi, Cemin and Castagna 2004). All of this just points again to uniqueness and variation in capabilities, as Amanda Baggs and the other authors and researchers I’ve mention, show.

As for unique evidence, in my opinion it’s kind of a pity that DORE seems to be more keen on charging for the ‘therapy’ rather than producing some evidence for what the newspaper article said about ‘100% recovery’? I guess I’ll keep waiting to see if that’s true…

Speaking of ‘online’ - I’ll let Amanda Baggs and the words of David Spicer finish this off:

References:

Bishop, D. (2007). Curing dyslexia and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder by training motor co-ordination: Miracle or myth? Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. Vol 43(10), 653-655.

McArthur, G. (2007) Test-retest effects in treatment studies of reading disability: The devil is in the detail. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research and Practice. Vol 13(4), 240-252.

Rutter M. Incidence of autism spectrum disorders: changes over time and their meaning. Acta Paediatr. 2005 Jan;94(1):2-15.

Tammet, D. ( 2006). Born on a Blue Day. Hodder and Stoughton, London.

Crossley, R & McDonald, A. (1989). Annie’s Coming Out. Penguin Books, Melbourne.

Continuing the Free Will Discussion

Although I have withdrawn from the “Cross Examined” site (see comments from two posts ago, as well as forthcoming post), I will continue to respond to the philosophical arguments and responses (such as they are) made on that site as they come to my attention — I’ll just do so here, where at least I can be certain of not being 1984ed. Neil and the others can continue their part in the discussion here, or on CE, or not at all, as they choose.

NEIL:
I’d like to see an example of how you think God CAN allow people to have freewill to cause suffering to others but can also control them such that they do not have the freewill to cause others to suffer?

DAVE:
Simple. God would simply actualize the world in which people freely make decisions that do not lead to suffering, thus eliminating the logical possibility that they will not make such choices. This is not compatible with A-type free will, but it is with B-type free will.

Happy Birthday to ME!

The Vandals, Happy Birthday to Me.

They Might Be Giants, Older

NOFX, New Happy Birthday Song


And tonight I'm probably going to drink a bit too much and generally have a good ol' time with my friends, probably have a few with my parents too.

Amino Acids and the Racemization “Problem”

 Amino acids come in two different "flavors" depending on the orientation of atoms bound to the central α-carbon. The two possibilities are L- and D- configurations. In the examples shown here, you can see that the two forms of serine, L-serine and D-serine, are mirror images of each other. These forms are called stereoisomers because they contain the same atoms with different mirror image

Shiny. Pretty. Slimy.

Wired has a pretty gallery of images from the recent Colossal Squid necropsy. If you've ever wondered what a pile of squid guts would look like on a table, here you go.

squid_guts.jpg

It's too bad the images aren't quite large enough to use as wallpaper on my laptop.

Oh, and those colors—that's exactly what slug guts look like, too. We natives of the Pacific Northwest have many opportunities to get familiar with those.

Read the comments on this post...

A Critique of Communism

At Daylight Atheism, Ebonmuse gives a cogent and mostly accurate critique of Communism.

To be pedantic, Ebonmuse criticizes "Communism" in the sense of the practices and policies of self-described Communist governments, such as the Soviet Union, China, North Korea, Cambodia, Vietnam, Albania, etc. ("practical Communism"). This is a completely legitimate target of criticism, and a completely legitimate way to use the unqualified word "Communism", but there are other more theoretical constructions that do differ substantively from the practical sense.

Furthermore, there are two distinct senses of theoretical Communism: economic and political. Political Communism is, even in theory, usually totalitarian or crypto-totalitarian, but political Communism is separable from economic Communism. Care should be taken, I think, to understand that a legitimate and (mostly) accurate critique of practical Communism cannot be applied willy-nilly to its theoretical cousins, especially its economic-theoretical cousin.

Communism lacks a good mechanism to allocate resources to where they are most needed, resulting in waste, shortages and inefficiency.

To be more precise, it is the part of Communism that specifies a state-planned economy that results in inefficient distribution of commodities. The problem is practical (or information-theoretical); it's not per se a problem in Communism's fundamental economic assumptions. In theory, a planned economy should be more efficient than a distributed free-market economy, but in practice information-theoretical laws of diminishing returns and exponential complexity of large formal systems doom the notion of central commodity distribution planning.

The information-theoretical analysis does not, however, entail that a state-planned capital allocation system would necessarily be worse that the Capitalist alternative; capital allocation is centralized under Capitalism in the capital-owning elite. Furthermore, a mixed system, where capital was partly state-owned and partly worker-owned, might have the advantages of both central and distributed planning, and would not violate the spirit of economic Communism.

Communism discourages productive effort and innovation.

This criticism is accurate, but it applies only to certain phases of practical Communism, and the identification of the specific cause as the lack of (immediate) "material rewards for invention, innovation, or greater productivity" is controvertible.

The two largest Communist governments, the Soviet Union and China, experienced massive economic growth and industrialization in the early phases of communist rule. (Admittedly, a large percentage increase from a tiny base is not at all impressive to anyone with a basic understanding of statistics.) There clearly there was some operating motivation other than immediate material reward. Additionally, there are any number of examples in Capitalist economies (notably the open-source software movement) of productive endeavor without immediate reward.

Furthermore, most productivity is rewarded by nothing more than brute survival in a static or contracting Capitalist economy (and quite a lot even in an expanding economy). While simply removing the work-or-starve ethic seems insufficient (and its replacement by a work-or-get-shot ethic seems worse), its replacement with a less brutal ethic would seem desirable from a humanitarian standpoint.

I suspect it's far more likely to lay the blame for late-stage practical Communism's lack of innovation on the failings of specifically political Communism. We see precisely the same lack of innovation in non-Communist totalitarian societies as well as in many large-scale Capitalist corporations (with an internal political culture of monarchical feudalism).

Communism necessarily denies the freedom of the individual.

There's no doubt that Communism as practiced has massively and inexcusably denied individual liberty and freedom, but it is again the specifically totalitarian component of political Communism, which politically privileges a specific party, that entails the denial of individual freedom.

But economic Communism does not necessarily entail the denial of freedom. Indeed, under ideal circumstances, everyone is free of economic coercion; they are entirely free to apply their productivity to suit their personal preferences. Even under non-ideal circumstances, people would be expected to have at least greater choice in allocating their personal productivity as desired.

Since economic communism does not permit exploitation or economic coercion, it has to be expected that some people will choose to be unproductive or less productive than they would have been under Capitalist work-or-starve economies. Since we have never seen economic communism in practice, it is an open question whether a great many people would choose to be negatively productive, and whether those who do choose negative productivity are those who would be very productive if coerced.

Foto Friday #3


In honor of Mother’s Day, I offer this pic of a gorilla mother and child:

– the chaplain

Almost Time to Buy a New Computer

My ancient Dell Dimension is simply no longer cutting it for Photoshop work even though it continues to meet most of my other limited computing needs. I've held off for long enough, and it is time to settle on a replacement. When faced with such decisions, it is sometimes helpful to walk through a series of decision points. I figured I might as well share my thought process in case anyone else would find it useful.

These have been my decision points so far:

Build or Buy?

Initially, I thought I might use this as an opportunity to build my first computer. This way, I could get exactly what I need without throwing money away on things I do not need. I am not into computer gaming at all, and the video cards in most systems seems to be overkill. At the same time, drive space and speed are rarely adequate, expandability tends to be limited, and there are never enough or the right kind of ports. However, I soon decided against building because I simply don't have the time (or interest, if I'm being honest) in researching components, etc. I may build eventually but not this time. Decision made.

Windows Vista or...What

I used to use Macs but switched to Windows several years ago because I needed to use Windows-only software regularly for work. I've been generally content with the stability of Windows XP SP3 on my home computer even though I've had a bit of ongoing trouble at work. After reading the reviews of Vista, including SP1, and talking to various friends using Vista, I decided that there was simply no way I was willing to go Vista. No apparent upside and many downsides. Some have suggested Linux, but that is not for me, at least not yet.

Sticking with Windows XP is certainly viable but seems the OS is clearly showing its age. Besides, the ongoing sort of problems I've had with it at work make me less eager to put it on another machine. Still, if I replace this PC with another PC, I've pretty much decided that it will run XP. But should I consider returning to Mac?

Mac or PC?

The thought of getting a Mac for Photoshop work and still having my old Dell to use as a music server and for the times when I do need to run PC-only software at home (so I won't even need Windows on the Mac) is certainly appealing. I can get an Apple educational discount and get the Mac version of MS Office free through work. I need to upgrade Photoshop anyway, so switching platforms shouldn't be too difficult. The current Mac OS sounds wonderful, and it would be great to have a more stable system that required less constant tinkering and updating.

Where the Mac decision gets hard is when the question of which Mac comes up. I've ruled out the Mini for a variety of reasons, I don't need a laptop, and the Mac Pro is overkill in many ways. This leaves me with only the iMac as an option. Fine except I hate the idea of all-in-one systems where I'm stuck with the monitor that houses the computer. Widespread reports of uneven screen brightness also make me a bit nervous.

In the end, it looks like critical question will be whether moving to Mac OS X is so desirable that I'm willing to live with the limitations of the iMac. I think it probably is, and I am leaning toward picking up a new 24" iMac in the next month. We'll see.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wrong, Wrong, Wrong

While I sit firmly on the far left compared to many of my peers here in Albuquerque, I also recognize that rights are for EVERYONE, including the right to free expression.

That's why I'm dismayed at an Albuquerque teen being disciplined for an anti-abortion protest in the school.

Now, I understand and support one aspect of this: I don't think it's particularly safe or healthy to seal one's mouth shut with duct tape, and I can see the school not allowing this. While this is a fairly ordinary way abortion protesters have dramatized their protests, schools shouldn't be put in the position of having liability associated with this... but silence and arm bands should not have been prohibited.

The protest was done the RIGHT way: Teens were encouraged to wear red arm bands and to be silent throughout the day in an effort to bring awareness that "abortion that has silenced the voices of so many of Bushnell's unborn peers."

While I absolutely disagree with the opinion expressed, I have to absolutely support the way this teen has chosen to express it.

This was no disruption, no yelling fists in the air protest that caused a break down of discipline and order in the school. This was a well thought out and planned protest, carried out with intent and dignity.

Kudos to 14 year old Janelle Bushnell for organizing the protest... shame on James Monroe Middle School for sending her to detention.

We tell our children to be thoughtful, to engage in the political process, to be aware of current issues. Schools are supposed to be training grounds for adulthood. This young lady has taken a great step towards adulthood, and should be encouraged, not discouraged.

I also have to point out that it wasn't her message that was being silenced... but that she had ANY message. APS isn't particularly left leaning (as those of you who've followed my daughter's attempts at creating a club for skeptics and free thinkers are well aware) , but while kids are taught one thing in the classroom, it seems in the long run administration still has the authority to demonstrate that it does NOT value independent minded individuals who speak their mind, even in the most appropriate manner.

What’s the Best Method for Evangelism?

Roar in the Forums asks:

What method was the worst when people tried to share their faith with you? I know some people hand out pamphlets and other people tell you you’re going to hell on the street corner, all kinds of ‘fun’ things. As a follow up question, how has rude/mean/annoying encounters like that caused you to feel about the Christian faith ? My last question is, what method of sharing faith has made you at least open to talking to the other person about their faith?

I hope the wording hasn’t offended anyone. I’ve never talked to an atheist before (well I did over this forum for the past few days but not in person) and I would really like to learn more. Thanks for taking time and reading this.

In addition: Are there any methods of Evangelism you would actually consider listening to?

Or are they all pointless?


Technorati Tags: ,

Share This

Pinellas County, Florida expels science

This is the Friends of Brooker Creek Preserve website — it looks exactly like the kind of organization I would support, a community effort to protect a local wildlife area. They lobby, they educate, they offer opportunities to hike and experience nature.

One problem: it's in Florida. That seems to mean the organization is infected with stupidity and cowardice.

As part of their educational mission, they were going to have a speaker come in next Febrary, Dr Lorena Madrigal of the University of South Florida. She studies genetics and human evolution, and was going to speak on 12 February, Darwin Day. To the Pinellas County bureaucrats, this is a problem.

"Biology without evolution is not biology," she suggested, which obviously explains, at least in the mind of William Davis, the Pinellas County director of environmental services, why the professor's speech would be problematic.

"Her topic was about evolution," Davis said. Well, yeaaaaaah! "I flinched on that."

"I canceled her out after discussing it with my supervisors," he said. "We are not the platform for debate on creationism versus evolution."

Right. Talking about evolution might annoy the creationists, so the county's response is to shut down and silence efforts to educate and inform by an environmental institution which relies on evolutionary biology to perform its mission. This is a perfect example of how creationists work to keep people ignorant, and create an environment free of legitimate information about a subject that contradicts their absurd literalist beliefs.

Read the comments on this post...

DNA Replication in E. coli: The Problem

 I've started reading microcosm by my favorite science writer, Carl Zimmer [Buy This Book!]. Watch for a review, coming soon. I was mildly disappointed to see Carl repeat a common myth about DNA replication in E. coli on page 29. Since we often use this myth to teach critical thinking in our undergraduate classes, I thought it would be worthwhile to discuss it here. Today I'm going to present

Friday Cephalopod: Veiny

octopus_marginatus.jpg
Octopus marginatus

Figure from Cephalopods: A World Guide (amzn/b&n/abe/pwll), by Mark Norman.

Read the comments on this post...

Colbert Dissects Oil Companies ‘Gas Dollar’ Ads

~ Who knew the oil companies were non-profits? Now I feel bad for railing against their billion dollar quarterly statements, it seems they really make "no money" on crude oil like many people assert. We have made posts here regarding the skyrocketing gas prices and the effect on the economy and we have heard many rationalizations, the weakening dollar, small profit margins for the oil companies and market demand. In regards to the small margins, I had no idea just how small they were until I...

[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]

life through time